 
          3274
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          (2)
        
        
          1 2
        
        
          0
        
        
          2
        
        
          
            t
          
        
        
          
            t D C M
          
        
        
          
            e
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
            D
          
        
        
          
            e
          
        
        
          of Al is 4.77
        
        
          ×
        
        
          10
        
        
          -15
        
        
          m
        
        
          2
        
        
          /s which was obtained by the serial
        
        
          batch leaching test (Watanabe et al., 2010). As
        
        
          
            t
          
        
        
          
            1
          
        
        
          is 0, the Eq. 2
        
        
          transforms to Eq. 3, and it relates the cumulative Al release
        
        
          
            M
          
        
        
          
            exp
          
        
        
          obtained in the triaxial tests to the elapsed time
        
        
          
            T
          
        
        
          .
        
        
          
            e
          
        
        
          
            DC
          
        
        
          
            M
          
        
        
          
            T
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          2
        
        
          0
        
        
          2
        
        
          exp
        
        
          4
        
        
          
        
        
          (3)
        
        
          Therefore, the transition of the internal friction angle caused
        
        
          by decomposing the mechanical bridging is calculated as shown
        
        
          in Table 3. Approximate 1.3% decrease in the internal friction
        
        
          angle supposedly causes during 38 years.
        
        
          
            4.2 Shear strength transition addressing decomposition of
          
        
        
          
            organic matter
          
        
        
          The organic matter decomposition of DWS as a subgrade
        
        
          material is able to be interpreted as following, assuming aerobic
        
        
          and unsaturated condition. Jenny (1941) described the decrease
        
        
          in soil organic matter as Eq. 4.
        
        
          
            rX
          
        
        
          
            dt
          
        
        
          
            dX
          
        
        
          
        
        
          (4)
        
        
          where
        
        
          
            X
          
        
        
          is the mass of organic matter and
        
        
          
            r
          
        
        
          is the rate of
        
        
          decomposition. A solution of Eq. 4 is given by Eq. 5.
        
        
          
            rt
          
        
        
          
            e X X
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          0
        
        
          (5)
        
        
          Assuming aerobic biodegradation, discharged CO
        
        
          2
        
        
          is
        
        
          originated from the carbon loss of decomposed organic matter
        
        
          approximately. From the results of constant temperature storage
        
        
          in aerobic condition of DWS (Watanabe et al., 2011),
        
        
          
            r
          
        
        
          is
        
        
          determined by fitting Eq. 5 into the experimental data as shown
        
        
          in Fig. 8. The daily CO
        
        
          2
        
        
          discharge during organic matter
        
        
          decomposition corresponds to the decomposition mass of
        
        
          organic matter, so the time integral of Eq. 5 approximately
        
        
          represents the total mass of decomposed organic matter
        
        
          
            Q
          
        
        
          
            dec
          
        
        
          .
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          44
        
        
          12
        
        
          2
        
        
          1
        
        
          0
        
        
           
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
            rt
          
        
        
          
            et
          
        
        
          
            dec
          
        
        
          
            e
          
        
        
          
            e
          
        
        
          
            r
          
        
        
          
            X Q
          
        
        
          (6)
        
        
          Calculation results for the transition of the internal friction
        
        
          angle caused by decomposing the organic matter are listed in
        
        
          Table 4. Approximate 3.1% decrease in the internal friction
        
        
          angle by organic matter decomposition causes during 22 days in
        
        
          aerobic condition. Assumption of aerobic condition is not
        
        
          suitable for practice, so this study confirmed the organic matter
        
        
          decomposition in site. In the experimental construction that
        
        
          DWS was used as a backfill material of water pipe construction,
        
        
          the DWS layer was taken a position of -0.4 to -0.9 m depth
        
        
          under asphalt surface. The compaction degree was approximate
        
        
          64
        
        
          ―
        
        
          76%. The monitoring term was 19 months. As shown in
        
        
          Table 5, ignition loss slightly decreased at the end of the
        
        
          experiment. It is presumed that organic matter decomposition
        
        
          slowly progressed in contrast to the constant temperature
        
        
          storage because of anaerobic condition and lower temperature.
        
        
          The proposed method with aerobic condition excessively
        
        
          estimates the degradation in contrast of underground conditions.
        
        
          5 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          DWS is the aggregation of clay and organic compounds.
        
        
          Focusing on the chemical bonding by flocculating agent and
        
        
          organic matter, a simplified method for the prediction of
        
        
          changes in shear strength of DWS in geotechnical works was
        
        
          proposed. The decomposition of the mechanical bridging and
        
        
          the organic matter was described based on diffusion-controlled
        
        
          Al leaching and aerobic biodegradation, respectively. The
        
        
          methodology proposed in this paper is significant to encourage
        
        
          safe geotechnical utilizations through estimations of the usable
        
        
          term for not only DWS but also available waste or by-products.
        
        
          Table 3. Shear strength transition addressing decomposing the
        
        
          mechanical bridging.
        
        
          Cumulative
        
        
          Al release
        
        
          (mg/kg)
        
        
          Calculated
        
        
          elapsed time (y)
        
        
          Internal friction
        
        
          angle (deg.)
        
        
          0
        
        
          0
        
        
          37.2
        
        
          0.130
        
        
          17.4
        
        
          37.6
        
        
          0.192
        
        
          38.0
        
        
          36.7
        
        
          Table 4. Shear strength transition addressing decomposing the
        
        
          organic matter.
        
        
          Decomposition rate of
        
        
          organic matter (%)
        
        
          Calculated
        
        
          elapsed time (d)
        
        
          Internal friction
        
        
          angle (deg.)
        
        
          0
        
        
          0
        
        
          38.8
        
        
          0.14
        
        
          2
        
        
          39.2
        
        
          0.79
        
        
          12
        
        
          38.5
        
        
          1.38
        
        
          22
        
        
          37.6
        
        
          0
        
        
          500
        
        
          1000
        
        
          1500
        
        
          2000
        
        
          2500
        
        
          3000
        
        
          3500
        
        
          0
        
        
          50
        
        
          100 150 200 250
        
        
          1: DWS-F(clod size: 2 - 19mm)
        
        
          2: DWS-F(clod size: less than 2 mm)
        
        
          3: DWS-G(clod size: 2 - 19mm)
        
        
          4: DWS-S (clod size: 2 - 19mm)
        
        
          5: DWS-S (clod size: less than 2 mm)
        
        
          Daily CO
        
        
          2
        
        
          discharge (mg/kg/d)
        
        
          Elapsed time (d)
        
        
          r
        
        
          X
        
        
          0
        
        
          CASE
        
        
          -0.0125
        
        
          2607.1
        
        
          1
        
        
          -0.0155
        
        
          1725.1
        
        
          2
        
        
          -0.0215
        
        
          1563.9
        
        
          3
        
        
          -0.0157
        
        
          2589.8
        
        
          4
        
        
          -0.0175
        
        
          3408.0
        
        
          5
        
        
          Figure 8. Results of constant temperature storage in aerobic condition of DWS (Watanabe
        
        
          et al., 2011).
        
        
          Table 5. In-situ monitoring results of ignition loss of DWS
        
        
          Ignition loss (%)
        
        
          Compaction
        
        
          degree
        
        
          (%)
        
        
          CBR
        
        
          (%)
        
        
          before
        
        
          construction
        
        
          19 months
        
        
          later
        
        
          Air-dried
        
        
          DWS
        
        
          75.9
        
        
          38.1
        
        
          16.9
        
        
          16.6
        
        
          Filter-
        
        
          pressed
        
        
          DWS
        
        
          64.3
        
        
          55.3
        
        
          24.7
        
        
          24.0
        
        
          REFERENCES
        
        
          1) Jenny, H. (1941):
        
        
          
            Factors of soil formation
          
        
        
          , McGraw-Hill, New
        
        
          York.
        
        
          2) Mitchell, J. K. and Soga, K. (2005):
        
        
          
            Fundamentals of Soil
          
        
        
          
            Behavior
          
        
        
          , third edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
        
        
          3) Montgomery J. M. (1985):
        
        
          
            Water Treatment Principles and Design
          
        
        
          ,
        
        
          John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp.116-134.
        
        
          4) Ohkubo, N., Yagi, O., and Okada, M.: Effects of humic and fulvic
        
        
          acids on the growth of microcystis aeruginosa,
        
        
          
            Environmental
          
        
        
          
            Technology
          
        
        
          , Vol. 19, pp. 611-617, 1998.
        
        
          5) Roque, A. J. and Carvalho, M. (2006): Possibility of Using the
        
        
          drinking water sludge as geotechnical material,
        
        
          
            Proc. of 5
          
        
        
          
            th
          
        
        
          
            International Congress of Environmental Geotechnics
          
        
        
          , pp.1535–
        
        
          1542.
        
        
          6) Watanabe, Y. et al. (2009): Environmental impact assessment of
        
        
          drinking water sludge,
        
        
          
            Journal of Japan Society of Civil
          
        
        
          
            Engineering G
          
        
        
          , Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 188-201.
        
        
          7) Watanabe, Y. et al. (2010): Serial Batch Leaching Test for
        
        
          Evaluating Degradation of Drinking Water Sludge in Geotechnical
        
        
          Reuse,
        
        
          
            Proc. of 6
          
        
        
          
            th
          
        
        
          
            International Congress of Environmental
          
        
        
          
            Geotechnics
          
        
        
          , pp.1073-1078.
        
        
          8) Watanabe, Y. et al. (2011): Composition and decomposition of
        
        
          organic matter of drinking water sludge,
        
        
          
            Proc. of 9
          
        
        
          
            th
          
        
        
          
            Geo-
          
        
        
          
            Environmental Engineering
          
        
        
          , pp. 435–438.