 
          2728
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          have been carried out at End of Initial Drive (EOID) and, after
        
        
          13 days, at Beggining of Resrtike (BOR) condition is selected to
        
        
          study the different components contributing to the setup effects.
        
        
          2 CONSTRUCTION SITE AND TESTS
        
        
          Fajr II is a 32-hectar utility plant in PetZone of Mahshahr,
        
        
          located in southwes Iran near Persian Gulf. The site
        
        
          accommodates a power plant, pre-treatment and treatment water
        
        
          units and air unit. Different types of precast and prestressed
        
        
          driven concrete piles at a total of nearly 7000 points have been
        
        
          constructed within the past three years. About 6000 points
        
        
          include 450 mm outside diameter prestressed spun piles with a
        
        
          wall thickness of 80 mm and closed-toe. The spun piles have
        
        
          been driven with Kobe-35 and Kobe-45 diesel hammers, or
        
        
          equivalents, down to embedment depths ranging between 14
        
        
          through 22 m. The dominant soil layering across the
        
        
          construction site is a very soft to stiff silty clay, average of 15 m
        
        
          thick (layers I & II), overlain a medium dense to dense sand, 4
        
        
          to 8 m thick (layer III). The pile tips are mostly embedded
        
        
          within the sandy layer. Table 1 shows the geotechnical
        
        
          parameters for construction site layers.
        
        
          Nearly 5000 spun piles, 450 mm OD were driven to support
        
        
          12 water tanks. Pile dynamic tests (PDA) and static load tests
        
        
          were carried out on 30 test piles & 221 construction piles,
        
        
          including, respectively, 54 & 251 PDA tests and 4 & 32
        
        
          compressive static load tests. Static and PDA tests procedure
        
        
          comply with general guidelines and specification of ASTM
        
        
          D1143 and D4945, respectively. Some of the comparisons
        
        
          between static and dynamic load tests are presented in
        
        
          Fakharian et al. (2012). In fact about 5% of the construction
        
        
          piles were PDA tested and average of 2 piles were static load
        
        
          tested at each tank. With support of the test program, the factor
        
        
          of safety was lowered to about 2 to 2.2 and sometimes as low as
        
        
          1.8, that resulted in considerable savings compared to previous
        
        
          projects in the region. The construction challenges and cost
        
        
          savings are presented in more details by Fakharian et al. (2012).
        
        
          Further information about tank details, test piles and
        
        
          borehole location, pile arrangement and No. of construction pile
        
        
          tests can be found in Sarrafzadeh et al. (2012).
        
        
          The dominant soil layering in the 32-hectar site is highly
        
        
          variable but classified in three layers, from top to bottom
        
        
          respectively, layer 1 with 8 m thickness as soft clay, layer 2, 7
        
        
          m thick as medium stiff to stiff clay, and layer 3, sand down to
        
        
          20 m. The incremental and cumulative shaft capacities from
        
        
          CAPWAP analysis are available, from which,
        
        
          β
        
        
          -factor versus
        
        
          depth is back-calculated. All the data points of five tanks were
        
        
          put together and the results are presented in Fig. 1.
        
        
          Figure 1.
        
        
          β
        
        
          variation with depth at EOD and Restrike for all tanks.
        
        
          The lower and upper bounds of
        
        
          β
        
        
          -values and the average
        
        
          trend lines are plotted in Fig.2. The average trend line can be
        
        
          represented by empirical Eq. (1):
        
        
            e
        
        
          . .
        
        
          in which, z (in m) is depth from ground surface.
        
        
          Similarly, Eqs. (2) and (3) represent the upper bound,
        
        
          β
        
        
          
        
        
          , and
        
        
          lower bound,
        
        
          β
        
        
          
        
        
          , respectively. The
        
        
          β
        
        
          parameter variation with
        
        
          depth value is limited to 1.5 in all equations.
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
           e
        
        
           .
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
           e
        
        
           .
        
        
          Figure 2. Mean
        
        
          β
        
        
          and lower and upper bounds at restrike.
        
        
          3 NUMERICAL MODEL AND VALIDATION
        
        
          Test pile No. 11 with 15.4 m embedment length is selected for
        
        
          modeling, PDA test was performed at End of Initial Drive
        
        
          (EOID) and, after 13 days, at Beggining of Resrtike (BOR)
        
        
          condition. an elastic isotropic cylindrical pile with radius of
        
        
          225.5 mm and 15.4 m length has been generated using the FEM
        
        
          numerical package ABAQUS, in 2D axisymmetric condition.
        
        
          Elasto-perfectly plastic model has been considered for the soil
        
        
          material. Therefore, the required parameters for the elastic part
        
        
          include elastic modulus, E, and Poisson’s ratio,
        
        
          ν
        
        
          , and Mohr-
        
        
          coloumb strength parameters for the shear failure. The soil
        
        
          surrounds the pile shaft with a radius of 5 m and length of 15.4
        
        
          m. The brick soil elements have been generated 2.5x2.5cm
        
        
          adjacent to the pile skin with gradual increase in size to reach a
        
        
          maximum dimension of 2.5x12.5cm at the vertical boundary.
        
        
          The pile shaft is simulated by 2.5x2.5cm solid elements. Table
        
        
          1shows the specified parameters for both pile and soil material.
        
        
          Table 1. Soil and pile parameters in numerical model (for TP 11)
        
        
          The solid element CAX4RP has been used for which
        
        
          simultaneous measurements of PWP and stress-strain are
        
        
          possible. It is assumed that drainage is possible from the ground
        
        
          surface only. Therefore, the top horizontal boundary was
        
        
          specified as a zero pressure surface. Interface elements were
        
        
          φ ̊
        
        
          C (kPa)
        
        
          K (m/s)
        
        
          E (MPa)
        
        
          γ‘
        
        
          (kN/m
        
        
          3
        
        
          )
        
        
          Depth
        
        
          (m)
        
        
          Soil type
        
        
          Layer #
        
        
          0
        
        
          27
        
        
          1×10
        
        
          -9
        
        
          20
        
        
          10
        
        
          0-7.4
        
        
          Soft clay
        
        
          I
        
        
          0
        
        
          27
        
        
          1×10
        
        
          -9
        
        
          20-50
        
        
          10
        
        
          7.4-12.4
        
        
          Medium
        
        
          to stiff
        
        
          clay
        
        
          II
        
        
          30
        
        
          1
        
        
          1×10
        
        
          -8
        
        
          50
        
        
          10
        
        
          12.4-15.4
        
        
          Medium
        
        
          dense to
        
        
          dense
        
        
          sand
        
        
          III
        
        
          -
        
        
          -
        
        
          -
        
        
          20,000
        
        
          14
        
        
          15.4
        
        
          Concrete
        
        
          Pile
        
        
          β  1.5
        
        
          (1)
        
        
          β  1.5
        
        
          (2)
        
        
          β  1.5
        
        
          (3)