 
          2734
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          
            Proceedings of the 18
          
        
        
          
            th
          
        
        
          
            International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
          
        
        
          suggests the strong interaction near the pile tip incase of 2.5D
        
        
          spacing.
        
        
          3.4
        
        
          
            Observed ground deformation
          
        
        
          Figures 12 and 13 show the ground deformation after the
        
        
          completion of loading tests. The colored sand layers were
        
        
          installed in the horizontal direction with the equal interval prior
        
        
          to model construction. The dotted lines show the initial location
        
        
          of each colored sand layer. After the pile penetration of 240
        
        
          mm, the distance of colored sand layers decreased to 5% of the
        
        
          original distance at the maximum below the pile bottom. This
        
        
          means that the ground just below the pile bottom was
        
        
          compressed severely. In the compressed core, heavy particle
        
        
          crushing was observed. These features occurred in both cases of
        
        
          pile spacing.
        
        
          In contrast, the shape of ground deformation between or
        
        
          below piles was different according to the spacing. For 5.0D
        
        
          spacing, the ground below each pile moved down separately.
        
        
          On the other hand, in case of 2.5D space the ground under the
        
        
          group pile deformed in a continuous convex way. Furthermore,
        
        
          the ground between piles also moved down. This suggests that
        
        
          the ground not only below the pile but also between piles was
        
        
          compressed downward together in the case of 2.5D spacing.
        
        
          4 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          The vertical loading tests of the group pile and the single pile
        
        
          were conducted. By comparing the bearing load, stress
        
        
          concentration by the pile location, pressure distribution and the
        
        
          ground deformation, the following conclusions may be drawn.
        
        
          (1) For the narrower 2.5D pile spacing, the group pile yields at a
        
        
          larger settlement and the settlement was almost same as that
        
        
          in the loading of a pile of a large diameter. In contrast the
        
        
          settlement in the 5.0D pile spacing was similar to that in the
        
        
          loading of a single pile of the same diameter.
        
        
          (2) For 2.5D pile spacing, tip resistance concentrated to the
        
        
          corner piles in the early state of loading. The concentrated
        
        
          load shifted to the center pile after the settlement increased.
        
        
          The same shift of the concentration occurred in the bottom
        
        
          of the single pile with the larger diameter as well.
        
        
          (3) The higher ground pressure occurred below the bottom of
        
        
          each pile individually in 5.0D spacing group pile near the
        
        
          pile bottom. In contrast, the higher pressure was observed in
        
        
          a block manner and the highest pressure showed a ring
        
        
          distribution in 2.5D spacing group pile.
        
        
          (4) The ground only below the bottom of each pile deformed
        
        
          downward individually in case of 5.0D spacing. Conversely,
        
        
          the ground under the group pile deformed in a contiguous
        
        
          convex curve for 2.5D spacing.
        
        
          From these observations, it was concluded that individual piles
        
        
          in the group pile with 5.0D spacing behaved independently. In
        
        
          contrast, the group pile of 2.5D spacing behaved in a block,
        
        
          similar to one large single pile.
        
        
          5 ACKOWREDGEMENT
        
        
          Authors are thankful to Dr. Sadao Yabuuchi, President of Japan
        
        
          Pile Corporation for his invaluable support. Authors also
        
        
          appreciate the discussion made by members of the research
        
        
          committee on group pile that was sponsored by the Kanto
        
        
          Chapter of the Japanese Geotechnical Society.
        
        
          6 REFERENCES
        
        
          1) Whitaker, T. : Experiments with Model Piles in Groups,
        
        
          Geotechnique, Vol. 7, pp. 147-167, 1957
        
        
          2) Vesic A.S. : A Study of Bearing Capacity of Deep Foundations,
        
        
          Final Rep., Project B-139, Georogia Inst. of Tech., 1967
        
        
          3) Itoh, A. and Yamagata, K. : Vertical Loading Test of Model Group
        
        
          piles(Part 3: Influence of Pile Spacing), Proceedings of Annual
        
        
          conference AIJ, Structure
        
        
          Ⅰ
        
        
          , pp. 661-662, 1988 (in Japanese)
        
        
          4) Goto, S. Aoyama, S., Liu, B., AyalaAlarco, R., Takita, A. and
        
        
          Towhata, I. : Model pile and group pile bearing capacity in large
        
        
          scale soil tank test ,Proceedings of IS-Kanazawa 2012, 2012
        
        
          Figure 11. Pressure distribution at 110mm distance
        
        
          Figure 10. Pressure distribution at 290mm distance
        
        
          Figure 12. Ground deformation
        
        
          after all loading tests
        
        
          Figure 13. Ground deform.
        
        
          near the pile bottom