 
          2910
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          properties for each layer at this test site are given by Dai et al
        
        
          (2012).
        
        
          Figure 1. Layout plan of test piles and pile groups ( all dimensions in
        
        
          millimeters).
        
        
          Loosef
        
        
          Stiffplasticclay
        
        
          Mediumdensesilt
        
        
          Mediumdensesilt
        
        
          intermixedwithsiltysand
        
        
          Softclay
        
        
          Depth(m)
        
        
          q
        
        
          c
        
        
          (MPa)
        
        
          q
        
        
          c
        
        
          (MPa)
        
        
          q
        
        
          c
        
        
          (MPa)
        
        
          q
        
        
          c
        
        
          (MPa)
        
        
          Figure 2. The CPT site logs and the layout of strain gauges in the
        
        
          test piles (all dimensions in meters).
        
        
          The piles were installed using the slurry method. A 0.4-m-,
        
        
          0.8-m- or 1.2-m-thick reinforced concrete cap was subsequently
        
        
          poured on the pile groups and single piles. Figure 1 shows a
        
        
          layout plan of the test piles and pile groups. The pile caps rested
        
        
          on the ground and may be considered rigid for practical
        
        
          purposes. The pile spacing was 2.5B in groups QZ2, QZ4 and
        
        
          QZ9 and 3.0B in groups QZ2L, QZ4L and QZ9L.
        
        
          The axial loads transferred along the instrumented piles were
        
        
          measured by strain gauges, which were installed evenly at each
        
        
          cross section for all test piles. There were 6 instrumented
        
        
          sections in each instrumented pile (Figure 2). A vibrating-wire
        
        
          load cell measured the pile top load of each pile in the pile
        
        
          groups during the loading process. The load tests were
        
        
          performed by the kentledge load method. The load tests were
        
        
          slowly maintained load tests. There were no unload-reload
        
        
          loops. Load was applied by hydraulic jacks. Settlements were
        
        
          measured at four locations on the upper surface of the cap by
        
        
          four displacement transducers.
        
        
          3 ANALYSIS OF LOAD TEST RESULTS
        
        
          The load-settlement curves for the two single piles (Figure 3)
        
        
          show that these two curves are almost identical for
        
        
          
            Q
          
        
        
          ≤ 900 kN,
        
        
          corresponding roughly to 0.6
        
        
          
            Q
          
        
        
          
            ult
          
        
        
          , with ultimate bearing capacity
        
        
          ,
        
        
          
            Q
          
        
        
          
            ult
          
        
        
          , defined based on the traditional 10% relative settlement
        
        
          criterion (Salgado 2008). For
        
        
          
            Q
          
        
        
          > 900 kN, the settlement at the
        
        
          pile top is greater for DZ1 than for DZ1L at the same load. The
        
        
          ultimate bearing capacity
        
        
          
            Q
          
        
        
          
            ult
          
        
        
          is 1430 kN for DZ1 and 1540 kN
        
        
          for DZ1L according to the 10% criterion.
        
        
          0 10 20 30 40 50 60 
        
        
          0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
        
        
          w (mm)
        
        
          Q(kN)
        
        
          DZ1:B=0.4m,L=20m
        
        
          DZ1L:B=0.4m,L=24m
        
        
          Figure 3. Load settlement curves for single pile tests.
        
        
          Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the axial load transfer curves for
        
        
          DZ1 and DZ1L throughout the loading process. There is
        
        
          significant transfer of load from the pile to the soil between 2.6
        
        
          m and 17.5 m for both DZ1 and DZ1L, which makes the
        
        
          resistance at the pile base for both DZ1 and DZ1L
        
        
          comparatively small. At the end of the test, the pile head load
        
        
          for DZ1 is 1440 kN while the pile base load is 31 kN. For
        
        
          DZ1L, the corresponding numbers are 1540 kN and 62 kN.
        
        
          These results suggest minimal and potentially zero base
        
        
          mobilization, which means that essentially all of the loads
        
        
          applied at the pile head are carried by shaft resistance. So both
        
        
          pile DZ1 (L/B = 50) and pile DZ1L (L/B = 60) derive their
        
        
          resistance from shaft resistance at values of relative settlement
        
        
          conventionally associated with the ultimate load. Complete
        
        
          shaft resistance mobilization in friction piles crossing soft soil
        
        
          layers may require large pile head settlement because of large
        
        
          axial pile compressibility.
        
        
          0 5 10 15 20 25
        
        
          0
        
        
          300
        
        
          600
        
        
          900
        
        
          1200
        
        
          1500
        
        
          Depth (m)
        
        
          Load (kN)
        
        
          240kN 360kN 480kN 600kN 720kN 840kN 960kN 1080kN 1200kN 1320kN 1440kN
        
        
          Figure 4. Axial force distribution for 20m-long single pile.
        
        
          0 5 10 15 20 25
        
        
          0
        
        
          300
        
        
          600
        
        
          900 1200 1500 1800
        
        
          Depth (m)
        
        
          Load (kN)
        
        
          280kN 420kN 560kN 700kN 840kN 980kN 1120kN 1260kN 1400kN 1540kN
        
        
          Figure 5. Axial force distribution for 24m-long single pile.
        
        
          Figure 6(a) shows the load-settlement curves for the single
        
        
          pile and the average load-settlement curves for the pile groups
        
        
          with L = 20 m. The average load per pile in a group is less than
        
        
          the load on a single pile at the same settlement except for pile
        
        
          group QZ2. This exception is likely caused by variability in the
        
        
          soil properties around that group or some variability in
        
        
          construction. The equivalent figure for L = 24 m is Figure 6
        
        
          (b),
        
        
          which shows a much more clear separation between the
        
        
          responses of the single pile and the average response of each
        
        
          pile group.