 
          23
        
        
          Terzaghi Oration
        
        
          
            / Allocution Terzaghi
          
        
        
          
            Proceedings of the 18
          
        
        
          
            th
          
        
        
          
            International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
          
        
        
          was sub-horizontal. The slip surface was detected Elevation 2.5
        
        
          m below the Salvail river bed (originally at Elevation 6 m) for
        
        
          the first two-third of its length. The last third of the slip surface
        
        
          was at Elevation 15 m near the scarp. These two levels of the
        
        
          failure surface explain the overlapping of blocks in the central
        
        
          part of the scar.
        
        
          Figures 20 and 21 and Table 9 present the results of a few of
        
        
          the stability analyses. Only the most critical of the 1000’s of
        
        
          slip surfaces are shown. Analyses under drained and undrained
        
        
          conditions were run. The analyses were run with the SEEP/W
        
        
          and SLOPE/W code (GeoStudio 2007 verG7.17; GeoSlope In-
        
        
          ternational).
        
        
          For the case of drained conditions (Fig. 20), the computed
        
        
          factor of safety (FS) was 0.98 with the Bishop method and 1.03
        
        
          with the Morgenstern-Price method. The lower part of Figure 20
        
        
          shows the area of all the circles giving a factor of safety of 1.05
        
        
          or less. All critical slip surfaces pass below the river bed, which
        
        
          agrees with the observations after the slide.
        
        
          For a failure surface extending significantly up slope (hori-
        
        
          zontal distance of 80 m in Fig. 21), the factor of safety was
        
        
          about 1.3, showing that this was not the triggering rupture
        
        
          mechanism. For undrained conditions (Fig. 21), using the ob-
        
        
          served slip surface, the safety factor was about 2.3.
        
        
          Table 9. Results of stability analyses of St-Jude landslide.
        
        
          Case
        
        
          Slip surface
        
        
          Method
        
        
          FS
        
        
          Circular
        
        
          Bishop
        
        
          0.98
        
        
          Drained
        
        
          (Fig.54)
        
        
          Horizontal
        
        
          Morgenstern-Price
        
        
          1.03
        
        
          Circular
        
        
          Bishop
        
        
          3.1
        
        
          Drained
        
        
          Entire slope
        
        
          Horizontal
        
        
          Morgenstern-Price
        
        
          3.3
        
        
          Circular
        
        
          Bishop
        
        
          2.2
        
        
          Undrained
        
        
          (Fig.55)
        
        
          Horizontal
        
        
          Morgenstern-Price
        
        
          2.3
        
        
          Figure 20. Results of limiting equilibrium analysis of St-Jude landslide
        
        
          under drained conditions: top: Bishop method, critical slip surface; bot-
        
        
          tom: All slip surfaces giving Factor of safety ≤ 1.05 (Locat
        
        
          
            et al
          
        
        
          2011).
        
        
          Figure 21. Results of limiting equilibrium analysis of St-Jude landslide
        
        
          under undrained conditions: Morgenstern-Price method, observed slip
        
        
          surface (Locat
        
        
          
            et al
          
        
        
          2011).
        
        
          6.4
        
        
          
            Lessons learned
          
        
        
          The high pore pressures in the clay below the river bed resulted
        
        
          in very low effective stresses, and therefore low resistance in
        
        
          the clay.
        
        
          The conventional analysis of the failure with circular slip
        
        
          surface gave a safety factor of unity under drained conditions,
        
        
          but could not explain the observed extent of the slide. Locat
        
        
          (2007) and Locat
        
        
          
            et al
          
        
        
          (2008) made similar observations.
        
        
          The trigger of the landslide is believed to have been of natu-
        
        
          ral origin. The stability was impaired by (1) the high artesian
        
        
          pore pressure at the toe of the slope and (2) shoreline erosion,
        
        
          also at the toe of the slope. Since the meteorological conditions
        
        
          did not show any heavy rainfall at the time of the landslide, the
        
        
          trigger of the movement was probably the continuous erosion of
        
        
          the toe, which had aggravated over the last 15 years.
        
        
          The failure probably occurred in two stages, the first a rota-
        
        
          tion, thereafter a translation, as suggested by the post-failure
        
        
          grabens and the horsts (Fig. 18). The movement stopped when
        
        
          the debris accumulated on the other side of the river bank gen-
        
        
          erated sufficient resisting forces to re-establish equilibrium.
        
        
          As mitigation in Saint-Jude on the Salvail River, the height
        
        
          of the natural slope was reduced to a maximum of 10 m, the
        
        
          river was moved about 60 m further away from the road and the
        
        
          debris were left in the landslide scar.
        
        
          7 RECURRENT SLIDING ON CAP LOPEZ
        
        
          7.1
        
        
          
            Description of the landslide
          
        
        
          On Cap Lopez in Gabon, a large underwater slide took place in
        
        
          July 1971. Twenty years later, the coastline had same topography
        
        
          as in July 1971. It was important to assess whether sliding would
        
        
          recur, as adequate safety was required for the oil terminal installa-
        
        
          tions on land.
        
        
          Pointe Odden in Gabon is known for its rapidly changing
        
        
          coastline due to complex erosion and sedimentation patterns,
        
        
          enhanced by the presence of a deep submarine canyon on the west
        
        
          side. A 3,000,000 m³ slide took place on Cap Lopez’ north end,
        
        
          called Pointe Odden in July 1971 (Fig. 22). Figure 23 shows some
        
        
          of the coastline movements since 1911.
        
        
          Figure 22. Topography before and after 1971 slide (Lacasse and Boisard
        
        
          1996)