 
          3126
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          the validity of mellowing technique, an attempt to look for
        
        
          alternative treatments was made.
        
        
          2 MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
        
        
          
            2.1 Test Soils and Basic Tests
          
        
        
          Criteria for selection of the test soils is as follows: soils have to
        
        
          belong to different geological formation and classification.
        
        
          Based on these criteria Sherman and Childress, Texas soils were
        
        
          sampled for the testing program. As per USCS classification,
        
        
          Sherman soil is classified as ‘CH’ whereas Childress is
        
        
          classified as ‘MH’ soil.  Gypsum is the sulfate source for both
        
        
          the soils. Soluble sulfate contents were determined using the
        
        
          TxDOT method (Tex-145-E, Colorimetric method). A 1:20
        
        
          initial soil/water dilution ratio is used in this method. Turbidity
        
        
          caused by the presence of sulfate is determined using
        
        
          “Colorimeter” and converted in to ppm.  Soluble sulfate content
        
        
          of Childress and Sherman soils are 24,000 ppm and 44,000 ppm
        
        
          respectively. Based on the classifications mentioned above these
        
        
          two soils are termed as “high sulfate soils”.
        
        
          Hydrated lime is used as the stabilizer for the soils
        
        
          understudy. Lime dosage is determined as per “Eades and
        
        
          Grim” test. Test soils were treated with various percentages of
        
        
          lime and pH test was conducted. The dosage at which soil pH
        
        
          reaches a value of 12.4 is considered as the optimum lime
        
        
          dosage. The optimum dosage of lime for both soils is 6% by dry
        
        
          weight. Optimum moisture content and dry density of natural
        
        
          and treated soils were obtained by conducting standard proctor
        
        
          tests as per ASTM standard procedures (ASTM D-698).  It was
        
        
          observed that maximum dry density decreased and optimum
        
        
          moisture content increased up on lime treatment. Classification
        
        
          and standard Proctor test results are summarized in Table 1.
        
        
          Table 1. Classification and Proctor Test Results
        
        
          
            Atterberg
          
        
        
          
            Limits
          
        
        
          
            Untreated Soil
          
        
        
          
            6% Lime
          
        
        
          
            Treated Soil
          
        
        
          
            Soil
          
        
        
          
            LL PL PI
          
        
        
          
            OMC
          
        
        
          
            (%)
          
        
        
          
            MDD,
          
        
        
          
            psf
          
        
        
          
            OMC
          
        
        
          
            (%)
          
        
        
          
            MDD,
          
        
        
          
            psf
          
        
        
          Sherman
        
        
          72 30 42 27
        
        
          89
        
        
          28
        
        
          87
        
        
          Childress 71 35 36 21
        
        
          103
        
        
          22
        
        
          96
        
        
          Note: LL – Liquid Limit; PL – Plastic Limit; PI – Plasticity
        
        
          Index; OMC – Optimum Moisture Content; MDD- Maximum
        
        
          Dry Density
        
        
          A series of chemical tests were conducted on test soils to
        
        
          determine the cation-exchange capacity (CEC), specific surface
        
        
          area (SSA) and total potassium (TP). Based on the
        
        
          mineralogical test results, clay mineralogy of the test soils was
        
        
          assessed as per the procedure outlined by Chittoori and Puppala
        
        
          (2011). Clay mineralogy indicated the dominance of
        
        
          Montmorillonite mineral in Sherman soil and Kaolinite mineral
        
        
          in Childress soil. Both soils exhibited swell potential upon
        
        
          hydration.
        
        
          
            2.2 Engineering Tests and Mineralogical Tests
          
        
        
          Engineering tests were performed on untreated test soils to
        
        
          assess the swell, shrinkage and strength characteristics. These
        
        
          tests include three dimensional (3-D) volumetric swell,
        
        
          shrinkage and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests.
        
        
          As alumina and silica constitute the chemical composition of
        
        
          Ettringite and Thaumasite, measurement of alumina and silica is
        
        
          essential. Alumina and silica that participate in the sulfate
        
        
          reactions are called “reactive alumina and silica”. Reactive
        
        
          alumina and silica measurements were conducted as part of the
        
        
          mineralogical tests.  All the engineering tests were conducted at
        
        
          optimum moisture content (OMC) and wet of optimum
        
        
          moisture content (WOMC) corresponding to 95% of maximum
        
        
          dry density. Wet of optimum moisture content is 2% and 3%
        
        
          higher than the optimum moisture content for Childress and
        
        
          Sherman soils.
        
        
          Mellowing technique has been successful in stabilizing soils
        
        
          with sulfate concentration up to 7,000 ppm (Harris et al., 2004).
        
        
          Applicability of mellowing for high sulfate soils has not been
        
        
          studied so far. To assess the validity of mellowing technique in
        
        
          high sulfate soils both the soils are treated with 6% lime and
        
        
          corresponding moisture from the proctor curve. Lime treated
        
        
          soils were mellowed for periods of 0 and 3 days in a moisture
        
        
          controlled environment. Since lime treatment makes the soil
        
        
          dry, to compensate for the moisture loss during the mellowing
        
        
          process, additional 3% moisture is provided for 3 day mellowed
        
        
          soils. Another reason for provision of additional moisture is to
        
        
          increase the solubility of gypsum and early depletion as the
        
        
          sulfate reactions occur during the mellowing period. After the
        
        
          elapsed mellowing periods, soil samples were recompacted and
        
        
          engineering tests were conducted. Data from the engineering
        
        
          tests is compared with untreated soils to witness the sulfate
        
        
          reactions occurring in high sulfate soils.  Reactive alumina and
        
        
          silica measurements were performed on the samples subjected
        
        
          to swelling and loss of aluminates and silicates were calculated.
        
        
          A brief description of the tests conducted is given below:
        
        
          
            2.2.1  Three Dimensional Volumetric Swell (3-D Swell) Test
          
        
        
          3-D swell tests were conducted on natural and treated soils to
        
        
          determine the maximum possible volumetric swell which is a
        
        
          combination of vertical and radial swell. These tests are
        
        
          conducted on 4 in. (101.6 mm) diameter and 4.6 in. (116.8 mm)
        
        
          height samples.  The samples are prepared using a gyratory
        
        
          compactor machine. Porous stones are placed at the top and
        
        
          bottom of the sample and a rubber membrane is placed around
        
        
          the sample. The samples are double inundated and a dial gauge
        
        
          is placed on the top of the sample to record the vertical swell
        
        
          with time.    Vertical swell readings are collected with time until
        
        
          there is no further swell for 24 hours. Radial swell of the sample
        
        
          is measured after the completion of the test using a pi-tape.
        
        
          Double inundation provides the worst possible scenario in field
        
        
          where the soil is 100% saturated and maximum swell is
        
        
          expected in this case. Researchers across United States and UK
        
        
          have successfully used double inundation technique for
        
        
          measuring the volumetric swell.
        
        
          
            2.2.2 Three Dimensional Volumetric Shrinkage Test
          
        
        
          3-D shrinkage tests were conducted as per the procedure
        
        
          developed by Puppala et al., 2004 to measure the decrease in the
        
        
          total volume of soil specimens due to the loss of moisture
        
        
          content in field samples during a dry spell. In order to replicate
        
        
          the worst possible conditions, drying from a compacted state to
        
        
          completely dry state is considered in this test. Soil samples were
        
        
          compacted to 2.26 in. (57 mm) diameter and 5 in. (127 mm)
        
        
          height using a static compaction machine. Initial sample height
        
        
          and diameter are measured at three locations and averaged.
        
        
          Samples are prepared at optimum and wet of optimum moisture
        
        
          contents and dried on bench top for 12 hours followed by oven
        
        
          drying for 24 hours.  Steps used in sample preparation and
        
        
          extraction are similar to the UCS sample except the sample
        
        
          sizes are different. After 24 hours, samples are removed from
        
        
          the oven and sample dimensions are taken. Volumetric
        
        
          shrinkage is calculated as the difference of initial and final
        
        
          volume divided by the initial volume expressed in percentage.
        
        
          
            2.2.3 Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) Test
          
        
        
          Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) tests were conducted
        
        
          as per ASTM D 2166 method. The main intention of these tests
        
        
          is to determine the strength changes during the mellowing
        
        
          process. Soil samples are treated with lime and allowed to
        
        
          mellow for 0 and 3 days. After the mellowing period soil
        
        
          samples were compacted to 2.8 in diameter (70 mm) and 5.6 in.
        
        
          (140 mm) height and moist cured in a 100% relative humidity