 
          3036
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          
            4.2 Longitudinal and transverse dispersivities
          
        
        
          Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the estimates of longitudinal and
        
        
          transverse dispersivities in comparison with the mean value of
        
        
          laboratory experiments and reported values (Forrer et al., 1999;
        
        
          Abbasi et al., 1995). Longitudinal and transverse dispersivity
        
        
          estimates ranged from 1.00 cm to 3.72 cm and from 0.52 cm to
        
        
          2.35 cm respectively, which are good agreement with reported
        
        
          values, indicating the effectiveness of the developed
        
        
          methodology. Also, the ratio of longitudinal to transverse
        
        
          dispersivities was in the range of 1 to 5.4, which is in the lower
        
        
          range of dispersivity ratios reported in porous media (Persson
        
        
          and Berndtsson, 2002).
        
        
          As a whole, both dispersivity values are slight larger than
        
        
          those identified in the laboratory. This is attributed to the
        
        
          difference between undisturbed soil in the field and disturbed
        
        
          soil in the laboratory. In addition, dye tracer moved through the
        
        
          soils in a preferential flow pattern, which induced higher
        
        
          dispersivities in more irregular flow patterns as compared with
        
        
          estimates obtained in laboratory tracer experiments. At the
        
        
          experimental site, some macropores were confirmed and
        
        
          influenced seepage and solute pathways in porous media.
        
        
          Figure 7 shows the relation between the applied rainfall
        
        
          intensity and the dispersivity estimates in the field as well as in
        
        
          the laboratory.  Mean values in each experiment are plotted in
        
        
          this figure. Despite of the rainfall intensity, both dispersivities
        
        
          remain constant. This is attributed to a relatively low degree of
        
        
          heterogeneity in the field of concern, while homogeneous
        
        
          packing of soil in the laboratory was reflected as a less variation
        
        
          of dispersivity estimates.
        
        
          5 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          In the present study, a new methodology using spatial moment
        
        
          analysis linked with image processing of a dye tracer behavior
        
        
          was developed to estimate dispersivities not only in longitudinal
        
        
          but in transverse directions. Laboratory and field tracer
        
        
          experiments under unsaturated flow conditions were conducted
        
        
          with dye, Brilliant Blue FCF. Dispersivities exhibited an
        
        
          increasing and decreasing tendency associated with water
        
        
          content and showed a dependency on infiltration rates.
        
        
          Laboratory and field studies were extended by a literature
        
        
          search to compare the new results with earlier work,
        
        
          demonstrating a good agreement between the experimental and
        
        
          published results. Experimental results indicated the
        
        
          effectiveness of the developed methodology for simultaneous
        
        
          assessment of transverse and longitudinal dispersion in
        
        
          unsaturated soils in a field as well as in a laboratory.
        
        
          6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
        
        
          The authors thank Mr. K. Suzuki for valuable discussion and
        
        
          Mr. H. Watanabe for giving us the permission to conduct the
        
        
          tracer experiments in his maize fields. The work reported here
        
        
          was supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B).
        
        
          7 REFERENCES
        
        
          Vanderborght J. and Vereecken H. 2007. Review of dispersivities for
        
        
          transport modeling in soils,
        
        
          
            Vadose Zone J
          
        
        
          ., 6, 29-52.
        
        
          McNeil J.D., Oldenborger G.A. and Shincariol R.A. 2006. Quantitative
        
        
          imaging of contaminant distributions in heterogeneous porous
        
        
          media laboratory experiments,
        
        
          
            J. Contam. Hydrol
          
        
        
          ., 84, 36-54.
        
        
          Flury M. and Flühler H. 1995. Tracer characteristics of Brilliant Blue
        
        
          FCF,
        
        
          
            Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J
          
        
        
          ., 59(1), 22-27.
        
        
          Forrer I. Kasteel R., Flury M. and Flühler H. 1999. Longitudinal and
        
        
          lateral dispersion in an unsaturated field soil,
        
        
          
            Water Resour. Res.
          
        
        
          ,
        
        
          35(10), 3049-3060.
        
        
          van Genuchten M.Th.1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the
        
        
          hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils,
        
        
          
            Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
          
        
        
          , 44,
        
        
          892-898.
        
        
          Tompson A.F.B. and Gelher L.W. 1990. Numerical simulation of solute
        
        
          transport in three-dimensional, randomly heterogeneous porous
        
        
          media,
        
        
          
            Water Resour. Res
          
        
        
          ., 26(10), 2541-2562.
        
        
          Abbasi F., Simunek J., Feyen J., van Genuchten M.Th. and Shouse P.J.
        
        
          1995. Simultaneous inverse estimation of soil hydraulic and solute
        
        
          transport parameters from transient field experiments:
        
        
          homogeneous soil,
        
        
          
            Trans. ASAE
          
        
        
          , 46(4), 1085-1095.
        
        
          Persson M. and Berndtsson R. 2002. Transect scale solute transport
        
        
          measured by time domain reflectometry,
        
        
          
            Nord. Hydrol.
          
        
        
          , 33, 145-
        
        
          164.
        
        
          Figure 5. Longitudinal dispersivity estimates with distance.
        
        
          Figure 7. Relation between rainfall intensity and dispersivity
        
        
          estimates.
        
        
          Figure 6. Transverse dispersivity estimates with distance.
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
        
        
          Rainfall intensity (mm/min)
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          Silica
        
        
          Andisol
        
        
          Field
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
        
        
          Displacement distance (cm)
        
        
          Field exp.
        
        
          Plot 1
        
        
          Plot 2
        
        
          Laboratory
        
        
          Forrer et al. (1999)
        
        
          Abbasi et al. (2003)
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          10
        
        
          0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
        
        
          Displacement distance (cm)
        
        
          Field exp.
        
        
          Plot 1
        
        
          Plot 2
        
        
          Laboratory
        
        
          Forrer et al. (1999)
        
        
          Abbasi et al. (2003)