 
          1182
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          Bottom edge impermeable
        
        
          Left edge impermeable
        
        
          Right edge impermeable
        
        
          Ground surface permeable (atmospheric pressure)
        
        
          20m
        
        
          Figure 7. Analysis cross-section
        
        
          1835.8m
        
        
          was exhibited during and after the earthquake. For material C at
        
        
          the 90% of Dc, a slip plane occurred from the top of the slope of
        
        
          the embankment due to the earthquake, resulting in collapse.
        
        
          However, it can be seen that as the Dc increased, the shear
        
        
          strain due to the earthquake reduced, and the seismic stability
        
        
          increased. From the above, it can be seen that greater seismic
        
        
          stability can be obtained from embankments constructed with
        
        
          materials with fast decay of structure and loss of
        
        
          overconsolidation (material A) than from embankments
        
        
          constructed from materials with little decay of structure, and
        
        
          loss of overconsolidation  (material C).
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 90%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 95%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 100%
        
        
          Immediately after the earthquake
        
        
          Immediately before the earthquake
        
        
          0
        
        
          4
        
        
          8 12 16 20%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 90%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 95%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 100%
        
        
          Figure 8. Shear strain distribution (material A)
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 90%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 95%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 100%
        
        
          Immediately after the earthquake
        
        
          Immediately before the earthquake
        
        
          0
        
        
          4
        
        
          8 12 16 20%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 90%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 95%
        
        
          Degree of compaction: 100%
        
        
          Figure 9. Shear strain distribution (material C)
        
        
          6 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          In this research, various laboratory tests were carried out on 5
        
        
          types of embankment material, and their mechanical behaviors
        
        
          were reproduced using the SYS Cam-clay model. Also, seismic
        
        
          response analysis was carried out for embankments constructed
        
        
          with 2 types of material with 3 Dc. The following are the
        
        
          conclusions obtained from this research.
        
        
          1) For all materials, an increase in
        
        
          
            q
          
        
        
          associated with an
        
        
          increase in
        
        
          
            p’
          
        
        
          during shearing was seen as a result of
        
        
          compaction, and the maximum of
        
        
          
            q
          
        
        
          increased. However, the
        
        
          trend in the increase was different for each material; for some
        
        
          materials, the maximum of
        
        
          
            q
          
        
        
          did not increase with compaction,
        
        
          and for some materials, the maximum of
        
        
          
            q
          
        
        
          suddenly increased
        
        
          from a certain Dc.
        
        
          2) The mechanical behavior of each material was
        
        
          reproduced with the SYS Cam-clay model using one set of
        
        
          material constants for each material and representing the
        
        
          differences in Dc by different initial conditions of structure and
        
        
          overconsolidation. It was possible to interpret the increase in Dc
        
        
          as decay of structure and accumulation of overconsolidation.
        
        
          When the
        
        
          
            q
          
        
        
          increased beyond CSL, it was found that the
        
        
          overconsolidation tended to increase. Also, it was found that a
        
        
          large maximum dry density, such as material A, exhibits that the
        
        
          decay of structure and loss of overconsolidation are fast, while a
        
        
          small maximum dry density, such as material C, there was little
        
        
          decay of structure, and loss of overconsolidation was moderate.
        
        
          3) From seismic response analysis using GEOASIA, it was
        
        
          found that the seismic stability of embankments was increased
        
        
          by increasing the Dc. Materials with fast decay of structure and
        
        
          loss of overconsolidation, such as material A, produce
        
        
          embankments with high seismic stability, so they are good
        
        
          embankment materials.
        
        
          7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
        
        
          Data for this report were provided by Atsuko Sato of the Civil
        
        
          Engineering Research Institute for Cold Region and Professor
        
        
          Seiichi Miura of Hokkaido University with the assistance of the
        
        
          2009 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
        
        
          Construction Technology Research and Development Subsidy
        
        
          Program, for which we wish to express our thanks.
        
        
          8 REFERENCES
        
        
          Asaoka A., Noda T., Yamada E., Kaneda K. and Nakano M. 2002. An
        
        
          elasto-plastic description of two distinct volume change
        
        
          mechanisms of soils. Soils and Foundations Vol. 42, No. 6, pp.47–
        
        
          57.
        
        
          Noda T., Asaoka A. and Nakano M. 2008. Soil-water coupled finite
        
        
          deformation analysis based on a rate-type equation of motion
        
        
          incorporating the SYS Cam-slay model. Soils and Foundations Vol.
        
        
          48, No. 6, pp. 771–790.
        
        
          Nakano et al. 2010. Comparison of the mechanical behavior of 2 types
        
        
          of soil with different compaction properties. 45
        
        
          th
        
        
          Conference on
        
        
          Research and Development in Geotechnical Engineering No. 133,
        
        
          pp. 265–266.
        
        
          Yokohama et al. 2010. Effect of compaction conditions on the shear
        
        
          properties of sandy silt used as a material for constructing levees.
        
        
          Abstracts of Japan Society of Civil Engineers 65
        
        
          th
        
        
          Annual
        
        
          Technical Conference III-142, pp. 283–284.
        
        
          Joyner W.B., Albert T. and Chen F. 1975. Calculation of nonlinear
        
        
          ground response in earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological
        
        
          Society of America Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 1315–1336.
        
        
          MLIT Public Works Research Institute Earthquake Disaster Prevention
        
        
          Research Center Vibration Research Department 2001.:
        
        
          Experimental survey of seismic design methods for buried
        
        
          structures taking large scale earthquakes into consideration,
        
        
          Summary Report on the Results of Experimental Survey Research
        
        
          by the Vibration Research Department. Vibration Research
        
        
          Department Document No. 22, pp. 19–20, 2001.3.