Actes du colloque - Volume 1 - page 349

364
Proceedings of the 18
th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
The water repellency and corresponding hydraulic and
geomechnical aspects needs to be adopted in engineering
practice to correctly estimate the overall behaviors. In this study,
wettable and non-wettable specimens were artificially
synthesized to preliminarily evaluate their basic properties. The
following observations can be made:
1. The critical hydraulic pressure above which water
begins permeating follows the Young’s formula. The
non-wettable sand exhibits the distinct water repellency
and the critical pressure increases with decreasing pore
size.
2. The hydraulic conductivity values of both hydrophilic
and hydrophobic sands appear alike at fully saturated
condition. Although the hydraulic conductivity with
varying degree of saturation requires further study, the
surface wettability may not affect the overall fluid flow
behavior at macro-scale.
3. From a series of the direct shear tests using the
hydrophilic and hydrophobic sands, the surface
modification at sub-micrometer scale clearly reduce the
shear strength of hydrophobic sand at dry condition.
The effect of degree of saturation is minimized for
hydrophobic sand due to the less defined meniscus at
inter-particle contacts. Yet, the shear strength of
hydrophilic sand evolves with varying degree of
saturation, exhibiting the maximum value at ~ 50%.
5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research is supported by the basic science research
program (No. 2012-0008233) and the Public welfare & Safety
research program (No. 2012M3A2A1050975) through the
National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
6 REFERENCES
Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of fluids in porous media.
New York: American
Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc
.
Byun, Y.-H., Tran, M.K., Yun, T.S., and Lee, J.-S., 2011. Strength and
stiffness characteristics of unsaturated hydrophobic granular media,
Geotechnical Testing Journal
, 35(1), 1-8.
Carman, P. C. 1956. Flow of gases through porous media.
Butterworths
Scientific Publications London
.
Derjaguin, B. and N. Churaev. 1986. Properties of water layers adjacent
to interfaces.
Fluid interfacial phenomena
. 663-738.
Donald, I.B., 1956. Shear strength measurements in unsaturated non-
cohesive soils with negative pore pressures.
Proc. 2nd Australian
and New Zealand Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Engineering
. 200-205.
Escario, V., 1980. Suction controlled penetration and shear tests.
Proc.
4th International Conference on Expansive Soils
, Denver, Co, 2,
781-797.
Escario, V., Saez, J., 1986. The shear strength of partly saturated soils.
Geotechnique
36(3), 453-456.
Frattolillo, A., G. Giovinco, M. Mascolo and A. Vitale. 2005, Effects of
hydrophobic treatment on thermophysical properties of lightweight
mortars, Experimental thermal and fluid science, 29(6), 733-741.
Gan, J.K.M., Fredlund, D.G., Rahardjo, H., 1988. Determination of the
shear strength parameters of an unsaturated soil using the direct
shear test.
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
25(8), 500-510.
Goebel, M. O., S. K. Woche, J. Bachmann, A. Lamparter and W. R.
Fischer. 2007. Significance of wettability-induced changes in
microscopic water distribution for soil organic matter
decomposition.
Soil Science Society of America Journal
. 71(5),
1593-1599.
Kim, B.S., Shibuya, S., Park, S.W., Kato, S., 2010. Application of
suction stress for estimating unsaturated shear strength of soils
using direct shear testing under low confining pressure.
Canadian
Geotechnical Journal
47(9), 955-970.
Kim, D.H., Kim, Y.J., Lee, J.-S., Yun, T.S., 2010. Thermal and
electrical response of unsaturated hydrophilic and hydrophobic
granular materials.
Geotechnical Testing Journal
34(5),562-570.
Nguyen, B.-L., Johannes, J., and Slob, E. C., 1999, Effects of
Wettability on Dielectric Properties of Porous Media. SPE Annual
Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct 3-6 1999, Houston, TX,
SPE, Richardson, TX.
Rodriguez, E. and G. Newaz. 1988. The effect of sand surface treatment
on sand
filled composites.
Polymer Composites
. 9(1), 93-102.
1...,339,340,341,342,343,344,345,346,347,348 350,351,352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,...840