 
          3152
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          5 FEM MODELING OF BORED PILES
        
        
          
            CFA Boring pile technology
          
        
        
          . The FEM elasto-plastic analysis
        
        
          was provided by computer program established by Prof.
        
        
          Tadatsugu Tanaka. It was used the mechanical properties of soil
        
        
          ground for the numerical calculation of bearing capacity and
        
        
          settlement. For analyzing bearing capacity of working as
        
        
          friction CFA and Casing piles were modeled and compared with
        
        
          results of static load test.
        
        
          Taking advantage of the axi-symmetric nature of the
        
        
          problem, only a half domain of the model ground and pile were
        
        
          analyzed. The soil ground and pile were discredited into four
        
        
          noded quadrilateral elements. Number of nodal points are 675,
        
        
          number of finite elements are 606, number of materials are 4
        
        
          (1is sand with gravel, 2 is hard clay, 3 is clay, 4 is bored pile).
        
        
          Figure 8. Comparison diagram
        
        
          During CFA pile installation the question of over-
        
        
          expenditure of concrete was appeared. The actual volume of
        
        
          borehole was about 1.3-1.4 times more than theoretical volume
        
        
          of borehole (Ashkey Y. 2008). After determination of
        
        
          preliminary average radius (r+
        
        
          
        
        
          r) increasing diameter of CFA
        
        
          piles and remodeled numerical mesh FEM analysis was
        
        
          repeated. It gives us increasing bearing capacity of CFA piles
        
        
          respectively “load-settlement” results of field static load test and
        
        
          stress and strain of soil around of single CFA pile through FEM
        
        
          computer program. The results of “load-settlement” through
        
        
          FEM illustrated in Figure 6.
        
        
          6 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          There were presented very short descriptions of geoengineering
        
        
          approach to the installation, testing and quality control of pile
        
        
          foundation which using on construction sites of Kazakhstan.
        
        
          This experience probable lead to the coming changes of the
        
        
          concept of Kazakhstan pile foundation design.
        
        
          During designing of CFA pile of buildings and structures is
        
        
          need to consider volume of borehole expansion by result of
        
        
          additional pressure, as well as over-expenditure of the concrete
        
        
          which is depend on soil conditions and length of pile.
        
        
          Significant differences between bearing capacities of DDS and
        
        
          casing boring piles show incomplete usage of DDS technology
        
        
          resources. The coefficient of shaft work of DDS pile was
        
        
          defined and equal from 1.2 to 1.3 depending on soil condition.
        
        
          PDA allows tests up to 10 piles per day, much cost effective
        
        
          than SLT, and more authentic than DLT. PDA is a type of DLT
        
        
          and is appropriate for any type of pile, but cannot be used to full
        
        
          extent on construction sites of Kazakhstan due to absence of
        
        
          Standard.
        
        
          Figure 6. Results of CFA FEM analysis
        
        
          
            DDS Boring pile technology
          
        
        
          . The FEM modeling of DDS
        
        
          pile was made in Plaxis 2D computer program (Figure 7).
        
        
          Pile integrity test is in the process of gaining official
        
        
          acceptance in Kazakhstan. PIT is a non-destructive method
        
        
          allowing make quality control of pile body whereupon of pile
        
        
          installation and even after many years of building exploitation.
        
        
          Geomonitoring for foundation settlement is indirect control of
        
        
          pile quality evaluation method and has become more relevant,
        
        
          especially for high-rise building construction.
        
        
          Application of advanced technologies of pile foundations
        
        
          installation led to a significant economical efficiency.
        
        
          According to tests results, the piles installed by the above
        
        
          technologies showed high values of bearing capacity, which led
        
        
          to a decrease of pile length by 10 to 20% and increase
        
        
          economical efficiency by 20 to 30%.
        
        
          7 REFERENCES
        
        
          Zhussupbekov A.Zh. and Lukpanov R.E. 2012, Geotechnical issues of
        
        
          megaprojects on problematical soil in Kazakhstan
        
        
          
            , Volume  of
          
        
        
          
            Abstracts of ACEM`12,
          
        
        
          Seoul, Korea, 127.
        
        
          Sultanov G.A., Zhussupbekov A.Zh. Lukpanov R.E. and Enkebaev S.B.
        
        
          2010, Research of Interaction between Displacement Pile and Soil
        
        
          Basement.
        
        
          
            Proc. of Kaz-Kor joint geotechnical seminar
          
        
        
          . Astana,
        
        
          Kazakhstan, 84-91.
        
        
          Figure 7. FEM modeling of DDS
        
        
          The comparison diagram of bearing capacities of DDS and
        
        
          traditional bored piles by Plaxis is presented in Figure 8
        
        
          (Expressed by k=F
        
        
          d
        
        
          /F
        
        
          u
        
        
          , where F
        
        
          d
        
        
          – DDS bearing capacity, F
        
        
          u
        
        
          –
        
        
          traditional bored pile bearing capacity). The points on diagram
        
        
          are lying above the diagonal line; it means that the values of
        
        
          DDS bearing capacity are exceeding traditional bored piles [2].
        
        
          Ashkey Y. 2008, Interaction of CFA bored piles with soil condition in
        
        
          Astana.
        
        
          
            A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the
          
        
        
          
            requirements for the PhD degree.
          
        
        
          Astana, Kazakhstan.
        
        
          SNiP RK 5.01-03-2002 “Pile foundation”.
        
        
          Zhussupbekov A.Zh. and Lukpanov R.E. 2012, Geotechnical issues of
        
        
          megaprojects on problematical soil in Kazakhstan
        
        
          
            , Proc. of 3
          
        
        
          
            rd
          
        
        
          
            ICNDSMGE-ZM 2012,
          
        
        
          Near East University, Nicosia, TRNC,
        
        
          67-75.
        
        
          After some transformation it was got FEM coefficient of
        
        
          DDS pile works, which vary from 1.23 – 1.35 depends on type
        
        
          of soil (See Table 1).