 
          2952
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          percentage change of water content and void ratio values
        
        
          obtained from peaty soil collected from the improved and
        
        
          unimproved areas. Consolidation tests revealed that the
        
        
          compression index of the peat layer has reduced from a range of
        
        
          2.65 to 2.13, to as low as 0.90 as a result of the ground
        
        
          improvement. The average reduced value is about 1.65. The
        
        
          results of long term consolidation tests carried out in the
        
        
          improved and unimproved peaty samples show that that the
        
        
          coefficient of secondary consolidation has reduced from a range
        
        
          of 0.10 to 0.13 to a range of 0.03 to 0.06. Subsequently the ratio
        
        
          of
        
        
          
            c
          
        
        
          has decreased from 0.050 to 0.029 due to ground
        
        
          improvement (Karunawardena and Nithiwana, 2009).
        
        
          
            CC
          
        
        
          /
        
        
          
        
        
          Consolidation test results also indicated that the pre-
        
        
          consolidation pressure of the peaty soil found under the
        
        
          embankment has increased as shown in Table 2. Table 2 also
        
        
          shows the expected load induced on the peaty layer due to the
        
        
          proposed embankment and the subsoil over consolidation ratio.
        
        
          According to the data in Table 2, the sub soil will behave under
        
        
          the over consolidated state with an OCR of 0.98 to 1.33. It
        
        
          should be noted here that even though the applied vacuum
        
        
          pressure and the fill surcharge load is adequate to yield an OCR
        
        
          value in the range of 1.2 to 1.3, sometimes the calculated OCR
        
        
          is less than that the anticipated value. This might be due to the
        
        
          inaccurate Preconsolidation Pressure (P
        
        
          c
        
        
          ) value obtained from
        
        
          the consolidation test as a result of sample disturbance.
        
        
          Table 2. Increment of preconsolidation pressure and undrained cohesion
        
        
          Location
        
        
          Expected
        
        
          Load
        
        
          (kPa)
        
        
          P
        
        
          c
        
        
          (kPa)
        
        
          OCR
        
        
          C
        
        
          u
        
        
          (kPa)
        
        
          C
        
        
          u
        
        
          / σ’
        
        
          v
        
        
          180
        
        
          1.13
        
        
          79.0
        
        
          0.49
        
        
          Ch.45.380-
        
        
          Ch.45.430
        
        
          160.0
        
        
          160
        
        
          1.00
        
        
          57.0
        
        
          0.36
        
        
          200
        
        
          1.37
        
        
          55.0
        
        
          0.36
        
        
          Ch.47.850-
        
        
          Ch.47.920
        
        
          145.0
        
        
          180
        
        
          1.25
        
        
          70.0
        
        
          0.45
        
        
          150
        
        
          0.98
        
        
          41.5
        
        
          0.27
        
        
          Ch.52.950-
        
        
          Ch.53.000
        
        
          152.5
        
        
          170
        
        
          1.11
        
        
          38.2
        
        
          0.25
        
        
          Ch.53.660-
        
        
          Ch.53.730
        
        
          150.0
        
        
          170
        
        
          147
        
        
          1.13
        
        
          0.98
        
        
          54.0
        
        
          50.5
        
        
          0.36
        
        
          0.34
        
        
          The strength gained due to ground improvement was
        
        
          investigated by calculating the ratio between the undrained
        
        
          shear strength of peaty soil and the effective stress (C
        
        
          u
        
        
          / σ’
        
        
          v
        
        
          ).
        
        
          The ratio between the undrained shear strength of peaty soil and
        
        
          the effective stress (C
        
        
          u
        
        
          / σ’
        
        
          v
        
        
          ) after the treatment program was
        
        
          obtained to be 0.25 to 0.49.
        
        
          5.3
        
        
          
            Observed settlement after pavement construction
          
        
        
          The surface settlement of the highway embankment constructed
        
        
          over the improved soft ground was monitored by installing the
        
        
          settlement markers at 50 m intervals after construction of the
        
        
          road pavement. Initially, for about a 6 month period, before the
        
        
          road was opened to traffic, surface settlement was monitored at
        
        
          both the center and the edge of the embankment. The observed
        
        
          settlements were in the range of 0 mm to 5 mm in most of the
        
        
          ground improved sections except at very few locations where
        
        
          high embankments were constructed over thick peat deposits
        
        
          improved by the vacuum consolidation method. The observed
        
        
          surface settlement in those areas was around 10 mm to 20 mm
        
        
          at the end of six months after the construction of pavement.
        
        
          After the highway was opened to traffic in November 2011,
        
        
          settlement monitoring was carried out only along the edge of the
        
        
          highway embankment due to safety reasons. The observed total
        
        
          surface settlement up to September 2012, ten months after the
        
        
          highway was opened to traffic, is shown in Figure 3. The
        
        
          observed settlement was less than 5 mm in most of the sections
        
        
          and in only two locations the settlement exceeded 20 mm. The
        
        
          maximum observed settlement was 35 mm and the settlement
        
        
          prediction using the monitoring data indicates that the estimated
        
        
          residual settlement is less than 15 mm at the end of 3 years after
        
        
          the handing over of the project.
        
        
          Figure 3. Results of the surface settlement monitoring
        
        
          6 CONCLUSION
        
        
          This paper presents successful application of ground
        
        
          improvement work carried out in the construction of Southern
        
        
          Highway project in Sri Lanka. Ground improvement methods
        
        
          such as heavy tamping method and vacuum consolidation
        
        
          techniques were applied to construct the high embankments
        
        
          over thick peaty deposits. In both methods, a surcharge load had
        
        
          been applied to over consolidate the peaty soil. Field monitoring
        
        
          data obtained during the construction period indicates that the
        
        
          primary consolidation settlement due to final load of the
        
        
          highway embankment has already been completed and the
        
        
          secondary settlement had been reduced to control the residual
        
        
          settlement within acceptable performance limits. Investigations
        
        
          carried out at the site show that both physical and mechanical
        
        
          properties of the peat have improved significantly and the peaty
        
        
          soil will behave in an over consolidated state with a ratio of 1.2
        
        
          to 1.3 during the service life of the highway. The results of the
        
        
          post construction surface settlement monitoring of the
        
        
          expressway carried out up to date reconfirm that the ground
        
        
          improvement work was successful and the expected residual
        
        
          settlements are well below the allowable limit in the contract.
        
        
          7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
        
        
          The authors are grateful to the Road Development Authority of
        
        
          Sri Lanka, for the necessary approval and support extended
        
        
          towards writing this paper.
        
        
          8 REFERENCES
        
        
          Asaoka A. 1978. Observational Procedure of Settlement Prediction.
        
        
          
            Soil
          
        
        
          
            and Foundation
          
        
        
          , 18(4): 87-101
        
        
          Karunawardena A. and Nithiwana W. 2009. Construction of a trial
        
        
          embankment on peaty ground using vacuum consolidation method
        
        
          for a highway construction project in Sri Lanka. Proc. of 17
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical
        
        
          Engineering. Alexandria,Vol. 3. 2200-2203.
        
        
          Karunawardena A. and Toki M. 2011. Application of the Heavy
        
        
          Tamping Method on Sri Lankan Peaty Clay for the Construction of
        
        
          a Highway Embankment. Proc. of 14
        
        
          th
        
        
          Asian Regional Conference
        
        
          on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Hong Kong,
        
        
          China.