Actes du colloque - Volume 3 - page 812

2620
Proceedings of the 18
th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
on the large particles have also been found by Cheng and Minh
(2009) to be effective in granular mixtures.
The peak shear stress values obtained during the shearing of the
mixtures shown in Figs. 6 and 7 were plotted against the area
concentration of the large cylinders in the mixture. The result of
the plot is shown in Fig. 8.
Figure 7. Force chains in the samples with zero, one and two large
particles at a horizontal shear displacement equal to 3.5 mm.
Figure 8. Shear strength versus the area concentration of the large
cylinders in the simulated granular mixture.
An analysis of Fig. 8 indicates that the presence of the large
cylinders in the mixture has a reinforcing effect. That is, as the
number of large cylinders increase in the mixture, its shear
strength also increases. The best fit line shown in Fig. 8 has an
equation of the form:
S
c
= S
m
(1 + C
a
)
(2)
which is very similar to Eq. (1).
It should be noted that the DEM simulations did not represent
exactly the shape of the particles forming part of the laboratory
experiments. Also, the sizes of the particles used in the
laboratory experiments were different than those used in the
DEM simulations. However, the general results of the
laboratory tests are corroborated by the DEM simulations. In
addition, the DEM simulations help to explain the way internal
forces are transmitted through the particles in the laboratory
experiments. Thus, for the case of real sand-gravel mixtures, it
is expected that the shear strength of these mixtures will
increase with the volume concentration of the gravel in the
mixtures. Also, it should be noted that for the case of
embankments and natural slopes, the effectiveness of the
oversized particles on the shear strength of the mixtures forming
these structures will depend upon if the large particles are
located on or near the critical failure surface (Fig.1).
4 CONCLUSIONS
In the present study the shear strength of simulated granular
mixtures made of granular matrix in which large particles are
embedded was carried out using laboratory and numerical
analyses. Results from using both approaches indicated that the
presence of the large particles has a reinforced effect in the
mixtures. That is, the greater thenumber of the large particles in
the mixture, the greater is the shear strength of the mixtures.
5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work described herein was supported by Grants No. CMS:
0124714 and CMS: 0301815 to the University of Pittsburgh
from the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. This
support is gratefully acknowledged
6 REFERENCES
Budiman, J.S., Mohamadi, J., and Bandi, S. (1995). Effect of large
inclusions on liquefaction of sands. In: Static and Dynamic
Properties of gravelly Soils, Evans, M.D., and Fragaszy, R.J. (eds),
ASCE’s Geotechnical Special Publication No. 56
: 48-63.
Cheng, Y.P. Minh, N.H. (2009).DEM investigation of particle size
distribution effect on direct shear behavior of granular
agglomerates.
Powders and Grains 2009
, M. Nakagawa
(Editor), American Institute of Physics, New York, 401-404.
Fragaszy, R.J., Su, J., Sidiqqi, F.H., and Ho, C.L. (1992).Modeling
strength of sandy gravel.
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
,
ASCE, 118(6):920-935.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2002).
PFC2D(Particle Flow Code in
Two Dimensions) version 3.0
. Minneapolis.
Magier, J. and Ravina, I. (1982).Rock fragments and soil depth as
factors in land evaluation of Terra Rossa.
Soil Science Society of
America (SSSA) Special Publication No. 13
: 13-30.
Poesen, J., and Lavee, H. (1994).Rock fragments on top soil:
significance and processes
. Catena
, 23(1-2): 1-28.
Vallejo, L.E. (1989). An extension of the particulate model of stability
analysis for mudflows.
Soils and Foundations,
29 (3):1-13.
Vallejo, L.E. (1991). A plane stress direct shear apparatus for testing
clays.ASCE
Geotechnical Special Publication No
.27 (II
)
: 851-
862.
Vallejo, L.E. (2001). “Interpretation of the limits in shear strength in
binary granular mixtures.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
,
38:1097-1104.
concentration of the large cylinders in the mixture. The result of
the plot is shown in Fig. 8.
Figure 7. Force chains in the samples with zero, one and two large
particles at a horizontal shear displacement equal to 3.5 m.
Figure 8. Shear strength versus the area concentration of the large
cylinders in the simulated granular mixture.
An analysis of Fig. 8 indicates that the presence of the large
cylinders in the mixture has a reinforcing effect. That is, as the
number of large cylinders increase in the mixture, its shear
strength also increases. The best fit line shown in Fig. 8 has an
equation of the form:
S
c
= S
m
(1 + C
a
) (2)
which is very similar to Eq. (1).
It should be noted that the DEM simulations did not represent
exactly the shape of the particles forming part of the laboratory
experiments. Also, the sizes of the particles used in the
laboratory experiments w re diff rent than those used in the
DEM simulations. How ver, the g neral results of the
laboratory tests are corr borated by the DEM simulations. In
addition, the DEM simulations help to explain the way internal
forces are transmitted through the particles in the laboratory
experiments. Thus, for the case of real sand-gravel mixtures, it
is expected tha the shear strength of th se mixtures will
increase with the volume concentration of the gravel in the
mixtures. Also, it should be noted that for the case of
embankments and natural slopes, the effectiv ness of the
oversized particles on the shear strength of the mixtures forming
th se structures will d pend upon if the large particles are
located on or near the critical failure surface (Fig.1).
4 CONCLUSIONS
In the pr sent study the shear strength of simulated granular
mixtures made of granular matrix in which large particles are
embed ed was carried out using laboratory and numerical
naly es. Results from using both approaches indicated that the
pr sence of the large particles has a reinforced effect in the
mixtures. That is, the greater thenumber of the large particles in
the mixture, the greater is the shear strength of the mixtures.
5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work described h rein wa supported by Grants No. CMS:
0124714 and CMS: 30 815 to the University of Pittsburgh
from the National Science Foundation, Washington, D C. This
support is gratefully acknowledged
6 REFERENCES
Budiman, J.S., Mohamadi, J., and Bandi, S. (1995). Effect of large
inclusions on liquefaction of sands. In: Static and Dynamic
Properties of gravelly Soils, Evans, M D., and Fr gaszy, R.J. (eds),
ASCE’s Geotechnical Special Publication No. 56
: 48-63.
Cheng, Y.P. Minh, N.H. (2009).DEM investigation of particle size
distribution ffect on direct shear behavi r of granular
agglomerates.
Powders and Grains 2009
, M. N k g wa
(Editor), America Institute of Phy ics, New York, 401- 04.
Fr gaszy, R.J., Su, J., Sidiqqi, F H., and Ho, C.L. (1992).Modeling
strength of sandy gravel.
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
,
ASCE, 118(6):920-935.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2002).
PFC2D(Particle Flow Code in
Two Dimensions) version 3.0
. Minneapolis.
Magier, J. and Ravina, I. (1982).Rock fragments and soil depth as
factors in land evaluation of Terra Rossa.
Soil Science Society of
America ( SSA) Special Publication No. 13
: 1 -30.
Po sen, J., and Lavee, H. (1994).Rock fragments on top soil:
significance and processes
. Catena
, 23(1-2): 1-28.
Vallejo, L.E. (1 89). An extension of the particulate model of stability
nalysis for mudflows.
Soils and Foundations,
29 (3): -13.
Vallejo, L.E. (1991). A plane stress direct shear apparatus for testing
clays.ASCE
Geotechnical Special Publication No
.27 (II
)
: 851-
862.
Vallejo, L.E. (2001). “Interpretation of the limits in shear strength in
binary granular mixtures.”
C nadian Geotechnical Journal
,
38:1097-1104.
1...,802,803,804,805,806,807,808,809,810,811 813,814,815,816,817,818,819,820,821,822,...840