 
          1404
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          compared to that of an irregular configuration obtained by
        
        
          shifting square grids, thus preventing a straight flow passage of
        
        
          liquefied soil. Shaking table tests on sloping ground and quay
        
        
          wall models proved that the irregular pattern was more effective
        
        
          in reducing residual displacements in the treated soil volume;
        
        
          nevertheless, the ‘damming effect’ increased both downstream
        
        
          deformation in the sloping ground (Fig. 18a) and pore pressure
        
        
          in the treated backfill behind the quay wall (Fig. 18b).
        
        
          0
        
        
          20
        
        
          40
        
        
          60
        
        
          80
        
        
          100
        
        
          120
        
        
          140
        
        
          160
        
        
          Lateral displacement (mm)
        
        
          -1200
        
        
          △
        
        
          :CASE1(No improvement)
        
        
          ●
        
        
          :CASE2(Irregular 25%)
        
        
          □
        
        
          :CASE4(Regular 25%)
        
        
          -1000-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
        
        
          Holizontal position (mm)
        
        
          Improved area
        
        
          0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
        
        
          0.0
        
        
          0.2
        
        
          0.4
        
        
          0.6
        
        
          0.8
        
        
          1.0
        
        
          Cumulative displacement of quay wall (mm)
        
        
          Case6
        
        
          Case8
        
        
          Maximum excess pore water pressure ratio
        
        
          :200Gal
        
        
          :500Gal
        
        
          Case7
        
        
          (b)
        
        
          (a)
        
        
          irregular
        
        
          regular
        
        
          untreated
        
        
          Figure 18. Lateral displacements and pore pressure buildup in shaking
        
        
          table tests on sloping ground (a) and quay wall (b) with columnar
        
        
          treatments (
        
        
          
            N. Takahashi et al.
          
        
        
          ).
        
        
          5 GROUND DEFORMATION AND SLOPE STABILITY
        
        
          The paper by
        
        
          
            Isobe & Ohtsuka
          
        
        
          (Japan) reports a comprehensive
        
        
          ‘Study on long-term subsidence of soft clay due to 2007 Niigata
        
        
          Prefecture Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake’ (M
        
        
          w
        
        
          =6.8). Pre-earthquake
        
        
          long-term settlements due to groundwater pumping at
        
        
          Kashiwazaki City were observed to significantly increase after
        
        
          the event. An accurate field (SPT) and laboratory (oedometer
        
        
          plus static and cyclic TX tests) investigation was carried out to
        
        
          calibrate the mechanical parameters of three soft to medium
        
        
          stiff clays, in order to carry out a coupled elasto-plastic FEM
        
        
          analysis of a 50m deep layering. The simulation of the shaking
        
        
          and post-earthquake behaviour allowed to predict pore water
        
        
          pressure increase and dissipation (Fig. 19), resulting in a long-
        
        
          term settlement as high as 25 cm in about 100 years.
        
        
          0.00
        
        
          0.05
        
        
          0.10
        
        
          0.15
        
        
          0.20
        
        
          0.25
        
        
          0.30
        
        
          0.35
        
        
          0.40
        
        
          45m
        
        
          35m
        
        
          25m
        
        
          15m
        
        
          5m
        
        
          Excess Pore Water Pressure Ratio
        
        
          Time
        
        
          100 200 300
        
        
          (sec)
        
        
          (year)
        
        
          1 30 60 90 120 150
        
        
          Figure 19. Pore pressure buildup and dissipation predicted by elasto-
        
        
          plastic simulation of earthquake-induced subsidence (
        
        
          
            Isobe & Ohtsuka
          
        
        
          ).
        
        
          
            Tsai et al.
          
        
        
          (Taiwan-USA) propose a simplified procedure for
        
        
          a slope stability ‘Pseudo static analysis considering strength
        
        
          softening in saturated clays during earthquakes’. They update
        
        
          and combine well-established approaches for estimation of the
        
        
          shear strain amplitude and the equivalent number of uniform
        
        
          strain cycles from the peak ground acceleration and other
        
        
          seismological and site parameters. On such a basis, the strength
        
        
          softening can be evaluated and implemented in post-earthquake
        
        
          pseudo-static stability analysis. The method was applied to
        
        
          predict the post-seismic reduction of safety in an embankment
        
        
          at Berryman Reservoir (USA), as well as for the interpretation
        
        
          of the observed damage induced by the 1999 Kocaeli
        
        
          earthquake (Turkey) at the Carrefour shopping center, which
        
        
          cannot be explained without a strength reduction (Fig. 20).
        
        
          0
        
        
          20
        
        
          40
        
        
          60
        
        
          80
        
        
          -20
        
        
          -10
        
        
          0
        
        
          Depth (m)
        
        
          NewFill,
        
        
          
        
        
          =34
        
        
          OldFill,
        
        
          
        
        
          =34
        
        
          ML/CL,PI=10,Su=25 kN/m 2
        
        
          SM,PI=11,
        
        
          
        
        
          =32
        
        
          CH,PI=37,Su=35 kN/m 2
        
        
          A
        
        
          B
        
        
          C
        
        
          D
        
        
          E
        
        
          FS=3.0 (pre earthquake)
        
        
          FS=1.3 (during earthquake, no strength reduction)
        
        
          FS=1.0 (during earthquake, 15% strength reduction)
        
        
          Distance (m)
        
        
          Figure 20. Stability analyses at Carrefour shopping center (
        
        
          
            Tsai et al.
          
        
        
          ).
        
        
          
            Fotopoulou & Pitilakis
          
        
        
          (Greece) present a ‘Reliability
        
        
          analysis of empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced
        
        
          sliding displacements of slopes’, comparing the predictions of:
        
        
          - the coupled Bray & Travasarou (2007) stick-slip model
        
        
          (B&T), based on a single ground motion parameter, i.e.
        
        
          S
        
        
          a
        
        
          (1.5T
        
        
          S
        
        
          ), being T
        
        
          S
        
        
          the degraded soil natural period;
        
        
          - the decoupled Rathje & Antonakos (2011) model (R&A),
        
        
          based on two ground motion parameters (PGA, PGV or their
        
        
          equivalent values for soft slopes);
        
        
          - the classical Newmark (1965) rigid block model (N).
        
        
          The Authors assumed as reference displacements the results
        
        
          of 2D elasto-plastic FDM analyses for ideal sand and clayey
        
        
          slopes, with different accelerograms as input motion. It was
        
        
          verified that the approximation increased with the degree of
        
        
          definition of the input motion, being the B&T model (1
        
        
          parameter) conservative, but with more dispersion, while the
        
        
          R&A (2 parameters) and the N (full time history) models under-
        
        
          predicted, although with less scatter, the FDM results (Fig. 21).
        
        
          Also, the reliability seemed overall better for the sand slopes.
        
        
          Such interesting benchmark claims for further comparisons on
        
        
          well-documented case studies.
        
        
          Figure 21. Median displacements predicted with simplified models vs.
        
        
          the corresponding FDM results (
        
        
          
            Fotopoulou & Pitilakis
          
        
        
          ).
        
        
          
            Abe et al.
          
        
        
          (Japan) present an ‘Analytical study of seismic
        
        
          slope behavior in a large-scale shaking table model test using
        
        
          FEM and MPM’, investigating on two steep model slopes
        
        
          constituted by sand-bentonite mixtures. A homogenous and a
        
        
          layered model with a weak sloping layer were shaken with
        
        
          irregular or regular time histories, showing rotational or planar
        
        
          failure mechanisms, respectively. Blind numerical predictions
        
        
          of the former model test by nonlinear multiple spring FEM
        
        
          analysis could not capture the observed failure mechanism (Fig.
        
        
          22 a-b), which was conversely well-predicted by the Material
        
        
          Point Method (MPM), able to simulate progressive failure due
        
        
          to strain-softening (Fig. 22c). The latter approach was also
        
        
          effective to predict the observed shear failure mechanism and
        
        
          displacements exhibited by the layered model.
        
        
          0.0
        
        
          0.005
        
        
          0.011
        
        
          0.017
        
        
          0.022
        
        
          0.028
        
        
          0.033
        
        
          0.039
        
        
          0.044
        
        
          0.050
        
        
          0.055
        
        
          (a)
        
        
          (b)
        
        
          (c)
        
        
          Figure 22. Observed failure (a) and contours of maximum shear strain
        
        
          predicted by FEM (b) and MPM (c) analyses (
        
        
          
            Abe et al.
          
        
        
          ).