 
          1405
        
        
          Technical Committee 203 /
        
        
          
            Comité technique 203
          
        
        
          Two more case studies of failure mechanisms occurring
        
        
          along soft-stiff soil interfaces, although not relevant to
        
        
          earthquake loads, are described by
        
        
          
            Rangel-Núñez et al.
          
        
        
          (Mexico) and
        
        
          
            Johansson et al.
          
        
        
          (Norway).
        
        
          The first paper describes a ‘Pioneer application of a dynamic
        
        
          penetrometer and boroscope in archeological prospecting’ of a
        
        
          heterogeneous fill covering a tuff pyramid, showing
        
        
          deformation and cracking induced by man-made excavation and
        
        
          environmental processes. FEM analyses proved the existence of
        
        
          a mechanism of plastic/creep sliding along the underlying tuff.
        
        
          The second contribution investigates the ‘Impact of blast
        
        
          vibrations on the release of quick clay slides’ through empirical
        
        
          attenuation laws of PGV and numerical simulations of rock
        
        
          blasts near quick clay deposits. Cyclic loading contour diagrams
        
        
          based on CTX tests were used for simplified estimates of
        
        
          threshold vibration velocities inducing local slope failure.
        
        
          6 RETAINING STRUCTURES
        
        
          
            Otani et al.
          
        
        
          (Japan) describe a comprehensive ‘Investigation of
        
        
          Reinforced Earth in the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku
        
        
          Earthquake’, presenting damage statistics as well as detailed
        
        
          site-specific surveys. Only 4 out of the 1419 surveyed walls
        
        
          showed full collapse mechanisms (Fig. 23), attributed to: (a)
        
        
          inadequate drainage and earthfill material, (b) slippage on soft
        
        
          foundation soil, (c) scouring (bottom erosion) due to the wash
        
        
          away of an adjacent levee by the tsunami, and (d) weakness of
        
        
          strip-panels connections due to prior frost-heave.
        
        
          (a)
        
        
          (a)
        
        
          (b)
        
        
          (b)
        
        
          (c) (d)
        
        
          Figure 23. Observed failure (a) and contours of maximum shear strain
        
        
          predicted by FEM (b) and MPM (c) analyses (
        
        
          
            Abe et al.
          
        
        
          ).
        
        
          
            Watanabe & Koseki
          
        
        
          (Japan) propose a ‘Seismic design of
        
        
          retaining wall considering the dynamic response characteristic’.
        
        
          The purpose was to predict displacements of railway-supporting
        
        
          gravity walls more accurately than following the previous
        
        
          standard procedure, based on a pseudo-static approach relying
        
        
          on a ‘constant energy law’. The new design method applies  the
        
        
          Newmark (1965) model considering the combination of sliding
        
        
          and overturning modes, defined by the yield surface of bearing
        
        
          capacity in terms of horizontal force – moment relationship. The
        
        
          approach predicted displacements and rotations in fair
        
        
          agreement with those recorded in shaking table tests (Fig. 24)
        
        
          and observed on a damaged railway cantilever wall after the
        
        
          1995 Hyogo-ken nambu earthquake. In 2012 the proposed
        
        
          method was therefore adopted in the new performance-based
        
        
          design Japanese standard for railway retaining structures.
        
        
          5.5
        
        
          6.0
        
        
          6.5
        
        
          7.0
        
        
          1000
        
        
          500
        
        
          0
        
        
          -500
        
        
          -1000
        
        
          (Outward Inertia)
        
        
          Inward Acc.
        
        
          backfill
        
        
          walltop
        
        
          acceleration
        
        
          acceleration
        
        
          ↑
        
        
          Acceleration(gal)
        
        
          Time(sec)
        
        
          0
        
        
          2
        
        
          4
        
        
          6
        
        
          8
        
        
          10
        
        
          12
        
        
          14
        
        
          16
        
        
          18
        
        
          20
        
        
          overturning mode
        
        
          sliding and
        
        
          sliding mode
        
        
          Newmark method
        
        
          Measured displacement
        
        
          Horizontal displacment
        
        
          at the bottom(mm)
        
        
          0.00
        
        
          0.02
        
        
          0.04
        
        
          0.06
        
        
          0.08
        
        
          0.10
        
        
          0.12
        
        
          0.14
        
        
          0.16
        
        
          Response
        
        
          Base
        
        
          overturning mode
        
        
          sliding and
        
        
          overturing mode
        
        
          Newmark
        
        
          method
        
        
          Response rotational
        
        
          angle (rad)
        
        
          Measured angle
        
        
          Figure 24. Wall response in shaking table tests vs. predictions by
        
        
          Newmark analyses with different failure modes (
        
        
          
            Watanabe & Koseki
          
        
        
          ).
        
        
          
            Xiao et al.
          
        
        
          (USA) investigate on ‘Seismic responses of
        
        
          geogrid reinforced wall with Tire Derived Aggregates (TDA)
        
        
          backfill using reduced-scale shake table test’. This lightweight
        
        
          deformable recycled material was preliminarily characterized by
        
        
          laboratory large scale tests, then used to build a geogrid
        
        
          reinforced wall model overlying a thin sand layer resting on the
        
        
          table floor. The model, shaken by a Loma Prieta earthquake
        
        
          record, showed negligible relative base displacements while
        
        
          those at the top were characterized by significant elastic
        
        
          rebound (Fig. 25), not predictable by the rigid block model.
        
        
          Notwithstanding the limitations of both the scaling laws and the
        
        
          rigid base conditions, the Authors are encouraged to try FEM
        
        
          analyses for reliable interpretation of test data.
        
        
          -8
        
        
          -6
        
        
          -4
        
        
          -2
        
        
          0
        
        
          2
        
        
          4
        
        
          0
        
        
          10
        
        
          20
        
        
          30
        
        
          40
        
        
          5
        
        
          
            Displacement (cm)
          
        
        
          
            Time (sec)
          
        
        
          0
        
        
          Figure 25. Top displacement recorded in a shaking table test on TDA
        
        
          geogrid reinforced wall (
        
        
          
            Xiao et al.
          
        
        
          ).
        
        
          7 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
        
        
          All the contributions to this Technical Session were perfectly
        
        
          aligned with the main conference theme: ‘Challenges and
        
        
          innovations’ are a strong commitment for earthquake
        
        
          geotechnical engineering.
        
        
          From the bulk of the papers presented, it is apparent that
        
        
          advanced experimental techniques for cyclic and dynamic
        
        
          testing on soils are getting increasingly widespread in all
        
        
          countries. Some national scientific communities are
        
        
          progressively bridging the gap with the traditionally leading
        
        
          countries, U.S. and Japan above all, taking profit of their well-
        
        
          established expertise.
        
        
          The writer wishes to address some final comments as well
        
        
          as suggestions for discussion and future research developments.
        
        
          Field testing: practice in earthquake geotechnical
        
        
          engineering is achieving increasingly beneficial contributions
        
        
          from geophysics, especially in non-invasive techniques, such as
        
        
          surface wave methods. More effort should be devoted to in-situ