1406
Proceedings of the 18
th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
measurement of damping and characterization on hard-to-
sample materials, such as gravels and MSW.
Laboratory testing: a four decades experience in CTX and
RCTS tests makes such techniques well-established. However,
non-conventional equipments (HC, BT) as well as multi-
directional and irregular loading patterns can highlight some
specific aspects of cyclic stress-strain behaviour and strength,
which have traditionally been over-simplified.
Liquefaction assessment: while the classification of failure
criteria and mechanisms in element tests is still debated,
attention must be paid on the engineering applicability or
extension of empirical methods on peculiar soils, e.g. focusing
on the effects on fabric, non-plastic vs. plastic fines, crushable
grains and so on. Sequences of multiple earthquake loads are a
further challenge.
Physical and numerical modeling: their combination has an
immense value for the understanding of complex mechanisms,
calibration of design procedures and advanced models, and
optimization of mitigation technologies.
Innovative materials: recycled materials (e.g. waste, PVA
fibers, TDA) are increasingly used in element and model tests,
with satisfying performances as sustainable techniques for soil
reinforcement or lightweight fills.
Case studies: the damage scenario induced by a strong-
motion earthquake, although dramatic, is still the most
representative investigation ‘laboratory’. Post-earthquake
ys provides new addresses for future
improvements for the codes of practice.
You
tion of liquefaction resistance of soils.
Journal of
neering
127(10), 817–
Fot
Tak
Tak
Yasuda S.
oil properties of liquefied soils in Tokyo Bay area by
the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake.
Zekkos D., Sahadewa A., Woods R., Stokoe K.H., Matasovic N. 2013.
In situ assessment of the nonlinear dynamic properties of Municipal
Solid Waste.
reconnaissance alwa
research and suggests
8 REFERENCES
rus R.D. and Stokoe K.H. 2000. Liquefaction resistance of
And
soils
from shear-wave velocity.
Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering
126(11), 1015-1025.
J.D. and Travasarou T. 2007. Simplified procedure for estimating
Bray
earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements.
Journal of
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
133(4), 381-392.
endeli B.M. 2001.
Development of a new family of norm
Dar
alized
modulus reduction and material damping curves
. Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin., TX, USA, 362.
ocode 8 2010.
Design of structures for earthquake resistance –P
Eur
art
5: Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects.
EN
1998-5:2010.
Ladd R.S. 1978. Preparing test specimens using undercompaction.
Geotechnical Testing Journal
1(1), 16-23.
Menq F.Y. 2003.
Dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils
, Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA, 364.
Newmark N.M. 1965. Effects of earthquakes on dams and
embankments.
Géotechnique
15(2), 139–159.
je E.M. and Antonakos G. 2011. A unified m
Rath
odel for predicting
earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible
slopes.
Engineering Geology
122(1-2), 51-60.
R.P. and Woods R
Ray
.D. 1987. Modulus and damping due to uniform
and variable cyclic loading.
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,
114(8), 861-876.
lins K.M., Evans M., Diehl N. and Daily W. 199
Rol
8. Shear modulus
and damping relationships for gravels.
Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoevironmental Engineering
, 124(5), 396-405.
d H.B., Martin P.
See
P. and Lysmer J. 1975.
The generation and
dissipation of pore water pressures during soil liquefaction
. EERC
75-29 California.
d H.B., Wong R.T., Idriss I.M., and Tokimatsu K. 1986. Mod
See
uli and
damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils.
Jorunal of Geotechnical Engineering
, 112(11), 1016-1032.
d T.L., Idriss I.M, Andrus R.D., Arango I., Castro G., Christian J.T.,
Dobry R., Finn W.D.L., Harder L.F. Jr, Hynes M.E., Ishihara K.,
Koester J.P., Liao S.S.C., Marcuson W.F. III, Martin G.R., Mitchell
J.K., Moriwaki Y., Power M.S., Robertson P.K., Seed R.B. and
Stokoe K.H. 2001. Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report
from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on
evalua
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engi
833.
9 PAPERS IN TECHNICAL SESSION
Abe K., Izawa J., Nakamura H., Kawai T., Nakamura S. 2013.
Analytical study of seismic slope behavior in a large-scale shaking
table model test using FEM and MPM.
Åhnberg H., Larsson R., Holmén M. 2013. Degradation of clay due to
cyclic loadings and deformations.
Asaoka A., Nakai K. 2013. Dependency of nonuniform ground surface
liquefaction damage on organization and slope of deep strata.
Barends F.B.J., Meijers P., Schenkeveld F.M., Weijers J.B.A. 2013.
Liquefaction impact revisited.
Bolouri Bazaz J., Bolouri Bazaz H. R. 2013. An experimental approach
to evaluate shear modulus and damping ratio of granular material.
Coelho P.A.L.F., Azeiteiro R.J.N., Marques V.D., Santos L.M.A.,
Taborda D.M.G. 2013. Challenges to the laboratory evaluation of
field liquefaction resistance.
Elmamlouk H., Salem M., Agaiby S.S. 2013. Liquefaction susceptibility
of loose calcareous sand of Northern Coast in Egypt.
opoulou S., Pitilakis K. 2013. Reliability analysis of empirical
predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of
slopes.
Gonzalez L., Pinilla C., Peredo V., Boroschek R. 2013. Correlations
between the shear wave velocity profile and the response spectrum
based on SASW tests.
Isobe K., Ohtsuka S. 2013. Study on long-term subsidence of soft clay
due to 2007 Niigata Prefecture Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake.
Jafarzadeh F., Zamanian M. 2013. Effect of stress anisotropy on cyclic
behavior of dense sand with dynamic hollow cylinder apparatus.
Johansson J., Løvholt F., Andersen K. H., Madshus C., Aabøe R. 2013.
Impact of blast vibrations on the release of quick clay slides.
Katzenbach R., Clauss F., Rochée S. 2013. Recent developments in
procedures for estimation of liquefaction potential of soils.
Liao T., Massoudi N., McHood M., Stokoe K.H., Jung M.J., Menq F.-
Y. 2013. Normalized shear modulus of compacted gravel.
Mominul H. M., Alam M. J., Ansary M. A., Karim M. E. 2013.
Dynamic properties and liquefaction potential of a sandy soil
containing silt.
Nakamichi M., Sato K. 2013. A method of suppressing liquefaction
using a solidification material and tension stiffeners.
Noda S., Hyodo M. 2013. Effects of fines content on cyclic shear
characteristics of sand-clay mixtures.
Orense R.P., Pender M.J. 2013. Liquefaction characteristics of
crushable pumice sand.
Otani Y., Takao K., Sakai S., Kimura K., Kuwano J., Freitag N., Sankey
J. 2013. Investigation of reinforced earth in the 2011 off the Pacific
coast of Tohoku earthquake.
Park D., Ahn J.-K. 2013. Accumulated stress based model for prediction
of residual pore pressure.
Rangel-Núñez J.L., Barba L., Ovando E. Auvinet G., Ibarra-Razo E.
2013. Pioneer application of a dynamic penetrometer and
boroscope in archeological prospecting.
Ray R. P., Szilvágyi Zs. 2013. Measuring and modelling the dynamic
behavior of Danube sands.
Sas W., Szymański A., Gabryś K. 2013. The behaviour of natural
cohesive soils under dynamic excitations.
Sze H. Y., Yang J. 2013. Cyclic loading behavior of saturated sand with
different fabrics.
ahashi N., Derakhshani A., Rasouli R., Towhata I., Yamada S. 2013.
Shaking model tests on mitigation of liquefaction-induced ground
flow by new configuration of embedded columns.
ahashi H., Morikawa H. Y., Iba H., Fukada H. , Maruyama K.,
Takehana K. 2013. Experimental study on lattice-shaped cement
treatment method for liquefaction countermeasure.
Tsai C.C., Mejia L.H., Meymand P. 2013. Pseudo static analysis
considering strength softening in saturated clays during
earthquakes.
Wang L.M., Yuan Z.X., Wang Q., Wu Z.J. 2013. Performance-based
evaluation of saturated loess ground liquefaction.
Watanabe K, Koseki J. 2013. Seismic design of retaining wall
considering the dynamic response characteristic.
Xiao M., Hartman D., Ledezma M. 2013. Seismic responses of
geosynthetically reinforced walls with Tire Derived Aggregate
(TDA) backfill.
2013. S
