 
          1030
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          shear resistance was measured by a multi-stage procedure with
        
        
          a constant shear velocity of 0.2 mm/min and three different load
        
        
          steps for each sample. Figure 7 shows the residual shear stress
        
        
          after 30 to 40 mm of displacement. Moreover, the first load step
        
        
          was used to measure one value for the peak shear resistance. By
        
        
          assuming zero cohesion this peak value was used to derive the
        
        
          peak friction angle for each material. Table 2 summarises the
        
        
          friction angles obtained from this data set. It shows that both
        
        
          peak and residual resistance are increased after chemical
        
        
          treatment.
        
        
          Table 2. Strength parameters of bentonite samples. For all values a
        
        
          rictional material with zero cohesion was assumed.
        
        
          f
        
        
          
            Raw Material
          
        
        
          
            Modified Material
          
        
        
          Peak friction angle
        
        
          24°
        
        
          31°
        
        
          Residual friction angle
        
        
          7°
        
        
          11°
        
        
          Figure 7. Results of multi stage ring shear tests on bentonite samples.
        
        
          The empty symbols represent peak shear resistance of the initial failure
        
        
          during the first load step loading. Residual state (full symbols) was
        
        
          reached after 30 to 40 mm of displacement in each load step.
        
        
          4 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          Based on the experimental work on different scales the
        
        
          following conclusions could be drawn:
        
        
          The molecular change of the clay minerals on the level of the
        
        
          surface chemistry results on the particle scale in an aggregation
        
        
          of small clay minerals to larger and stable particles. The
        
        
          aggregated, non-swelling particles provide an open pores
        
        
          system with pores of about 2 µm. Upon wetting these pores are
        
        
          no longer filled with an expanding clay phase but kept open.
        
        
          The pore water is not bound as immobile interlayer water and
        
        
          remains available for circulation.
        
        
          The compression tests have shown that the new structure is
        
        
          stable also under stresses up to 800 kPa for both pure bentonites
        
        
          and quartz/bentonite mixtures. Despite these drastic changes on
        
        
          the microstructural level, the stiffness is not significantly
        
        
          affected by chemical treatment. The material strength is
        
        
          positively influenced by the chemical treatment as both peak
        
        
          shear resistance and residual shear resistance for the modified
        
        
          bentonite is higher compared to the raw material. A negative
        
        
          influence on these mechanical properties can therefore be
        
        
          excluded.
        
        
          In summary, the findings are positive indicators for further
        
        
          development of the technique towards purposely creating zones
        
        
          of higher permeability in-situ as part of a drainage system in
        
        
          creeping landslides.
        
        
          5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
        
        
          The authors would like to thank Dr. M. Plötze of the ClayLab at
        
        
          ETH Zurich for his help during chemical laboratory testing.
        
        
          This work has been supported by grant Nr. 200021-137689
        
        
          from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Switzerland.
        
        
          6 REFERENCES
        
        
          ASTM Standard D 2435, 2004.
        
        
          
            One-Dimensional Consolidation
          
        
        
          
            Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading
          
        
        
          , ASTM
        
        
          International, West Conshohocken, USA.
        
        
          F. Fernandez, R.M. Quigley, 1985. Hydraulic conductivity of natural
        
        
          clays permeated with simple liquid hydrocarbons.
        
        
          
            Can. Geotech. J.
          
        
        
          ,
        
        
          22(2), 205-214.
        
        
          G. Lagaly, M. Ogawa, I. Dékány, 2006. Clay Mineral Organic
        
        
          Interactions. In: F. Bergaya, B.K.G. Theng, G. Lagaly, (eds.)
        
        
          
            Handbook of Clay Science
          
        
        
          , Elsevier, 309-377.
        
        
          F.T. Madsen, J.K. Mitchell, 1989. Chemical effects on clay hydraulic
        
        
          conductivity and their determination.
        
        
          
            Mitteilungen des IGBM
          
        
        
          , ETH
        
        
          Zürich, 135, 67.
        
        
          M. Plötze, G. Kahr, 2008. Diagnostic intercalation in clay minerals –
        
        
          use of Guanidine carbonate.
        
        
          
            Proc. of the 4th MECC, Mineralogia
          
        
        
          ,
        
        
          33, 132.