 
          1040
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          conditions pose a severe problem for simulating flow through
        
        
          porous media because the intrinsic permeability becomes
        
        
          viscosity dependent, while it should be a characteristic of the
        
        
          physical properties of porous medium alone. The deficiencies
        
        
          inherent in the BGK model can be significantly reduced by
        
        
          using a multiple-relaxation-time (MRT) approach (He et al.
        
        
          1997), which separates the relaxation times for different kinetic
        
        
          modes and allows tuning to improved numerical stability and
        
        
          accuracy. In this study we used D2Q9 MRT as they were
        
        
          introduced by Lallemand and Lue (2000), Extensive details can
        
        
          be found in Lallemand and Lue (2000), and
        
        
          Li et al. (2005).
        
        
          The Lattice-Boltzmann method for single-phase flow
        
        
          describes fluid flow as collisions of mass particles in a lattice
        
        
          (Chen et al., 1992). In two-phase flow, we follow almost the
        
        
          same procedures as in the single-phase case, except that we
        
        
          have two different types of particles representing two
        
        
          immiscible fluids, and we need to calculate surface tension and
        
        
          wettability. There are several popular Lattice Boltzmann (LB)
        
        
          techniques for the analysis of multiphase flows, three of which
        
        
          are the methods of Gunstensen et al. (1991), Shan & Chen
        
        
          (1993), and free energy approach by Swift et al. (1996). All
        
        
          three methods have been employed in numerical researches and
        
        
          each one has its distinct advantages. A review of these methods
        
        
          can be found in Nourgaliev et al. (2003). Among all of these
        
        
          LBM models, Shan & Chen’s model (SC model) is widely used
        
        
          due to its simplicity and remarkable versatility. It can handle
        
        
          fluid phases with different densities, viscosities and
        
        
          wettabilities, and handle different equations of state as well. In
        
        
          this study, the multi-component (2 fluids) single phase version
        
        
          of SC model has been applied (Sukop &Thorne, 2006).
        
        
          3 VERIFICATION
        
        
          In multi-component LB models, the bubble test is often
        
        
          conducted to check the ability of the model in relating the
        
        
          pressure difference (
        
        
          
            p
          
        
        
          ), radius of curvature (
        
        
          
            R
          
        
        
          ) and
        
        
          interfacial tension ( ) together in the situation that a bubble of
        
        
          one fluid is immersed in another fluid, which should indicate
        
        
          that
        
        
          
            p
          
        
        
          varies linearly with respect to curvature 1/
        
        
          
            R
          
        
        
          based on
        
        
          the well-known Laplace law:
        
        
          (1)
        
        
          Four different sizes of bubbles (Figure 1) are used for the
        
        
          numerical experiments. Figure 1b shows the capillary pressures
        
        
          for four different bubbles. The theoretical prediction is shown as
        
        
          a solid line. The simulated values (symbols) are obtained by
        
        
          simply calculating pressures inside and outside the bubbles at
        
        
          the end of the numerical simulations. The numerical results
        
        
          show very good agreement with the theoretical values.
        
        
          Another well-studied model of immiscible displacement, the
        
        
          so-called pore doublet model, is a little more complicated. A
        
        
          typical pore doublet consists of two tubes with different
        
        
          diameters, joined at both ends (Figure 2). Since the capillary
        
        
          pressure is inversely proportional to the radius of the tube, the
        
        
          capillary pressure of the smaller tube is greater than that of the
        
        
          bigger tube. Drainage-type snap-off occurs when the external
        
        
          pressure gradient is big enough to overwhelm the capillary
        
        
          pressure of the bigger tube, but is not big enough for the smaller
        
        
          tube. Theory and laboratory experiments show that under this
        
        
          condition the wetting phase in the smaller tube is trapped, while
        
        
          that in the bigger tube it is replaced by the non-wetting phase
        
        
          (Lenormand et al., 1983). Figure 2show that the two-phase
        
        
          Lattice-Boltzmann method successfully replicates the drainage-
        
        
          type snap-off, which tells us that the method accurately
        
        
          describes capillary pressure phenomena of porous media. If the
        
        
          displacing fluid is wetting, then both tubes will be swept out by
        
        
          the wetting fluid (figure 2.b)
        
        
          4 RELATIVE PERMEABILITIES
        
        
          One of the most comprehensive sets of experimental works
        
        
          regarding relative permeability was pursued by Payatakes and
        
        
          his co-workers (Valavanides et al. 1998, Tsakiroglou et al.
        
        
          2007) who performed experiments on the steady and unsteady
        
        
          flow regimes in porous core consisting of a chamber-and-throat
        
        
          network. Here, both steady and unsteady states experiments of
        
        
          Payatakes were selected for evaluation of the results of the
        
        
          developed LBM model. The dimensions of their specimen is
        
        
          0.16 ×0.11 m, and its absolute permeability is k = 8.9 μm
        
        
          2
        
        
          . The
        
        
          distance between the centers of the adjacent chambers is 1221
        
        
          μm, the mean throat depth is 116.6 μm, and the mean throat
        
        
          width is 167.5 μm.
        
        
          a
        
        
          b
        
        
          Figure 1. (a) Four different sizes of bubbles in steady-state condition (b)
        
        
          capillary pressure vs. reciprocal of bubble radius. Simulated values
        
        
          (symbols) agree well with the theoretical prediction (solid line).