 
          1041
        
        
          Technical Committee 105 /
        
        
          
            Comité technique 105
          
        
        
          a
        
        
          b
        
        
          Figure 2. Drainage-type snap-off in a doublet. (a) Displacing fluid
        
        
          (green) is non-wetting and displaced fluid (red) is wetting. (b)
        
        
          Displacing fluid is wetting and displaced fluid is non-wetting
        
        
          .
        
        
          The properties of the pair of the tested fluids are presented in
        
        
          Table 1. The simulations were carried out in a two-dimensional
        
        
          medium similar to the chamber-and-throat type networks used
        
        
          in the experiments (see Figure 3).  It should be mentioned that
        
        
          the dimensions of the model could not be considered as large as
        
        
          that of the experiment due to high computational costs.
        
        
          Table 1.Physicochemical properties of fluids
        
        
          
            Non-wetting fluid
          
        
        
          
            (n-nonanol)
          
        
        
          
            Wetting fluid
          
        
        
          
            (formamide)
          
        
        
          Viscosity(Pa s)
        
        
          0.00964
        
        
          0.00335
        
        
          Density(kg/
        
        
          )
        
        
          816
        
        
          1116
        
        
          Interfacial tension(mN/m)
        
        
          4.3
        
        
          Contact angle
        
        
          9
        
        
          a
        
        
          b
        
        
          Figure 3. (a) A segment of the glass-etched chamber-and-throat network
        
        
          used in experiments (b) domain used in LB simulation.
        
        
          At first,  the saturated permeability of the medium was
        
        
          determined by the numerical modeling for a steady-state
        
        
          Darcy’s velocity after applying a constant body force for one
        
        
          phase and setting the density of the other fluid equal to zero at
        
        
          all locations.  The result was
        
        
          k = 8.82μm
        
        
          2
        
        
          which is remarkably
        
        
          close to the experimental value of 8.9
        
        
          μm
        
        
          2
        
        
          It is important to
        
        
          note that the employed MRT approach in the developed LBM
        
        
          code  has  yielded more accurate predictions of both saturated as
        
        
          well as  relative permeabilities compare to  the standard BGK
        
        
          model, which  leads to a viscosity dependent permeability.
        
        
          4.1
        
        
          
            Steady state
          
        
        
          To simulate the steady-state experiments, we distributed fluid
        
        
          phases in the model according to target saturation. Flow at a
        
        
          given
        
        
          
            Ca is
          
        
        
          then commenced.
        
        
          (2)
        
        
          Where
        
        
          is the superficial flow velocity of the injected
        
        
          wetting phase at the entrance,
        
        
          is the viscosityof the wetting
        
        
          phase, is the interfacial tension.
        
        
          We imposed periodic boundary conditions and allowed both
        
        
          fluids to enter and exit the model. Phase saturations were thus
        
        
          constant during the simulations. We applied the same body
        
        
          force to each phase, thus the global pressure drop was the same
        
        
          for both fluids. This eliminated the capillary end effects since
        
        
          there were no gradients in capillary pressures.
        
        
          The two immiscible fluids flow until the relative
        
        
          permeabilities and the pressure drop have converged. When the
        
        
          system has converged and steady-state flow is established, the
        
        
          steady-state relative permeability of two fluids from a
        
        
          verage
        
        
          flow fluxes of the wetting and non-wetting fluids are calculated
        
        
          at several sections along the direction of the flow in the domain.
        
        
          Figure 4a shows an example of the initial distribution of the
        
        
          fluids in the domain and Figure5shows the experimental relative
        
        
          permeability curve as well as the results of LB simulation
        
        
          performed at a similar capillary number. According to Figure
        
        
          5the numerical results are in relatively good agreement with
        
        
          experimental measurements.
        
        
          a
        
        
          b
        
        
          Figure 4. (a)
        
        
          example of initial distribution of the fluids in steady-
        
        
          state simulation (b) example of invasion of wetting fluid(green)
        
        
          in unsteady state simulation.
        
        
          Figure 5.Comparison of LB modeling results and experimental relative
        
        
          permeability curves (steady state)
        
        
          (Ca=5E-6).
        
        
          4.2
        
        
          
            Unsteady state
          
        
        
          The unsteady-state method is widely used because it is fast and
        
        
          qualitatively resembles the flooding process in the oil reservoir.
        
        
          However, it is an indirect method. Relative permeabilities are
        
        
          calculated, not measured. Typically, the Johnson, Bossler and
        
        
          Naumann (JBN) method (
        
        
          Johnson et al. 1959
        
        
          ) or its variants are
        
        
          used to calculate relative permeabilities from the measured
        
        
          production data and pressure drop. This method is based on the
        
        
          assumptions that the flow velocity is high enough thereby
        
        
          making capillary end effects negligible and that the flow
        
        
          velocity is constant. In addition, the flow components should
        
        
          behave as immiscible and incompressible fluids comprising a
        
        
          stable displacement.
        
        
          Numerical simulation of the variation of relative permeabilities
        
        
          under unsteady- state situation is a difficult task that has not
        
        
          been performed before.  Here, by using the developed LBM
        
        
          code and employing MRT technique an attempt has been made