323
Technical Committee 101 - Session II /
Comité technique 101 - Session II
Proceedings of the 18
th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
95.0
1
694 ,6 )
(
iv
day
o
C
MPa
G
(3)
81.0
1
350 ,14 )
(
iv
day
o
C
MPa
M
(4)
Figure 2. Shear (G
o
) and oedometric (M
o
) moduli at one day of curing.
Figure 3 presents the variation of the shear (G
o
) and oedometric
(M
o
) modulus with porosity/cement ratio (
/C
iv
) considering all
four studied relative densities (10, 33, 66 and 90%), five cement
contents (1%, 2%, 3%, 5% and 7%) and 3 (three) days of
curing. Equations (5) and (6) present the variation of G
o
and M
o
with
/C
iv
, both with high coefficient of determination
(R
2
=0.95).
95.0
3
500 ,11 )
(
iv
days
o
C
MPa
G
(5)
81.0
3
257 ,23 )
(
iv
days
o
C
MPa
M
(6)
Figure 4 presents the variation of the shear (G
o
) and oedometric
(M
o
) modulus with porosity/cement ratio (
/C
iv
) considering all
four studied relative densities (10, 33, 66 and 90%), the five
cement contents (1%, 2%, 3%, 5% and 7%) and 5 (five) days of
curing. Equations (7) and (8) present the variation of G
o
and M
o
with
/C
iv
, both with high coefficient of determination
(R
2
=0.95).
Figure 3. Shear (G
o
) and oedometric (M
o
) moduli at three days of
curing.
95.0
5
304 ,13 )
(
iv
days
o
C
MPa
G
(7)
81.0
5
377 ,26 )
(
iv
days
o
C
MPa
M
(8)
Figure 4. Shear (G
o
) and oedometric (M
o
) moduli at five days of curing.
Figure 5 presents the variation of the shear (G
o
) and oedometric
(M
o
) modulus with porosity/cement ratio (
/C
iv
) considering all
four studied relative densities (10, 33, 66 and 90%), the five
cement contents (1%, 2%, 3%, 5% and 7%) and 7 (seven) days
of curing. Equations (9) and (10) present the variation of G
o
and
M
o
with
/C
iv
, both with high coefficient of determination
(R
2
=0.95 and 0.93, respectively for shear and oedometric
modulus).
95.0
7
595 ,15 )
(
iv
days
o
C
MPa
G
(9)
