195
        
        
          Technical Committee 101 - Session I /
        
        
          
            Comité technique 101 - Session I
          
        
        
          
            Proceedings of the 18
          
        
        
          
            th
          
        
        
          
            International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
          
        
        
          of the analytical solutions for consolidation under radial
        
        
          drainage are based on the assumption that only vertical
        
        
          compression occurs. A new physical consolidation model test
        
        
          under plane strain condition, which enables the observation of
        
        
          the deformation of a specimen through digital image analysis,
        
        
          and the measurement of the total vertical stress as well as the
        
        
          pore water pressures, is developed by Kim et al. (2013). A
        
        
          schematic view of the apparatus is shown in Figure 10.
        
        
          Consolidation tests of reconstituted kaolin samples (150 mm
        
        
          height, 140 mm width, and 40 mm thickness) were performed
        
        
          using the new consolidation apparatus under radial drainage,
        
        
          along with test under vertical drainage. Radial deformations as
        
        
          well as vertical deformations during consolidation were
        
        
          monitored and compared for the two different drainage
        
        
          conditions. Significant horizontal displacements are occurring
        
        
          during the early stages of the consolidation process, whereas
        
        
          during the intermediate stage, only minor horizontal
        
        
          displacements are identified. The horizontal displacements are
        
        
          higher near the boundaries and this induces uneven void ratio
        
        
          distribution at the end of consolidation. Meanwhile, for the
        
        
          vertical drainage, only minor variations of the horizontal
        
        
          displacements inferior of 0.006 mm were observed.
        
        
          Figure 10. Schematic view of the consolidation test apparatus (Kim et
        
        
          al. 2013)
        
        
          A laboratory apparatus for axi-symmetric electro-osmotic
        
        
          consolidation of cylindrical samples of 37.6cm diameter and
        
        
          20cm height is developed by Hu et al. (2013) with capabilities
        
        
          of measuring the electrical voltage, soil mass displacement,
        
        
          water discharge, and electrical current parameters (Figure 11).
        
        
          While tests on kaolin clay showed non-linear variation of soil
        
        
          parameters and complex coupling effects between water flow,
        
        
          soil deformation and electrical properties, a theoretical model
        
        
          that
        
        
          integrates Biot’s consolidation equation with the electro
        
        
          -
        
        
          osmotic flow and the equation for an electric field is proposed.
        
        
          Figure 12 shows the comparison of the surface settlement at one
        
        
          location between the numerical results and the experiment data.
        
        
          The simulations of the model with variable electrical
        
        
          conductivity agree better with the experimental data than those
        
        
          of the model with constant electrical conductivity.
        
        
          Figure 11. Electro-osmotic apparatus (Hu et al. 2013)
        
        
          Figure 12. Comparison of the settlement between the numerical
        
        
          results (two models) and recorded data (Hu et al. 2013).
        
        
          Compression properties of Swedish fine-grained sulphide
        
        
          clay soils are explored by Westerberg and Andersson (2013)
        
        
          through the monitoring and analysis of the long-term response
        
        
          of two instrumented real scale test embankments. Actually, the
        
        
          predicted settlements of a construction founded on sulphide
        
        
          soils deviates significantly from those measured in situ, and
        
        
          normally the predicted settlements are too small. In sulphide
        
        
          soils, the structure is often relatively porous and the voids
        
        
          between the mineral grains and clay particles are filled with
        
        
          pore water, organic material and iron sulphide. Field
        
        
          investigations of the properties of the sulphide soil were
        
        
          performed by cone penetration tests, field vane tests and
        
        
          Swedish piston sampling and an extensive program of
        
        
          laboratory investigation, in oedometer, both by incremental
        
        
          loading and constant rate of strain, creep tests, permeability as
        
        
          well as undrained direct simple shear tests, were conducted for
        
        
          the determination of compression and strength properties. Very
        
        
          good agreement between data given by different field
        
        
          instrumentations is reported.
        
        
          The heave rebound strain prediction of overconsolidated
        
        
          soils represents an important engineering design issue since the
        
        
          development of major road infrastructures that involve deep
        
        
          excavations and trenches. Based on the use of simple oedometer
        
        
          tests combined with an analysis of stress paths approached by
        
        
          Ylight model (Leroueil, Magnan & Tavenas, 1985), Petit et al.
        
        
          (2013) present a quantification method of those heave rebound
        
        
          strains. The results of the calculations of the heave rebound over
        
        
          a 120m deep clay deposit for three excavation depths of 10, 20
        
        
          and 40m are shown in the Figure 13. The estimations show that
        
        
          the elastic rebound are relatively small, between 0.01 and
        
        
          0.02m.
        
        
          Figure 13. The profile of the heave rebound for three different
        
        
          excavation depths (Petit et al. 2013).
        
        
          Top cap
        
        
          moisture
        
        
          trap
        
        
          
            z
          
        
        
          
            r
          
        
        
          Soil Sample
        
        
          displacement
        
        
          sensor
        
        
          Voltage
        
        
          sensor
        
        
          Cathode
        
        
          drain hole
        
        
          Vertical drain
        
        
          Anode
        
        
          Data acquisition instrument
        
        
          power source
        
        
          Vacuum pump
        
        
          Outlet of water
        
        
          ammeter
        
        
          
            -0.025
          
        
        
          
            -0.02
          
        
        
          
            -0.015
          
        
        
          
            -0.01
          
        
        
          
            -0.005
          
        
        
          
            0
          
        
        
          
            0
          
        
        
          
            20
          
        
        
          
            40
          
        
        
          
            60
          
        
        
          
            80
          
        
        
          
            100
          
        
        
          
            
              t
            
          
        
        
          
            /h
          
        
        
          
            Experiment data
          
        
        
          
            Numerical result:variable parameters
          
        
        
          
            Numerical result:constant parameters
          
        
        
          
            Settlement (m)
          
        
        
          Earth pressure
        
        
          gauge
        
        
          Pore pressure
        
        
          measuring points
        
        
          Back pressure
        
        
          reservoir
        
        
          LVDT
        
        
          Digital
        
        
          Camera
        
        
          PneumaticActuator
        
        
          Compressor
        
        
          Silicon
        
        
          Earth pressure
        
        
          gauge
        
        
          1 3 5
        
        
          2 4 6
        
        
          Drainage
        
        
          hole