 
          3050
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          2.1.1
        
        
          
            Water uptake model
          
        
        
          Water uptake was calculated by
        
        
          
            Hydrus-1D
          
        
        
          , through a
        
        
          macroscopic approach determining the sink term in
        
        
          
            Richards
          
        
        
          
            equation
          
        
        
          (Feddes et al., 1978; Vogel, 1988). In this study water
        
        
          stress was considered according to Feddes’ formulation (Feddes
        
        
          et al., 1978).
        
        
          The root water uptake was calculated directly by
        
        
          
            Hydrus
          
        
        
          code, through a macroscopic approach determining the sink
        
        
          term in the Richards equation. This term,
        
        
          
            s
          
        
        
          [T
        
        
          -1
        
        
          ], was calculated
        
        
          from the equation
        
        
          
            s
          
        
        
          (
        
        
          
            h,h
          
        
        
          φ
        
        
          
            ,x,t
          
        
        
          )
        
        
          
            =
          
        
        
          α
        
        
          (
        
        
          
            h,h
          
        
        
          φ
        
        
          ,
        
        
          
            x,t
          
        
        
          )
        
        
          
            b
          
        
        
          (
        
        
          
            x,t
          
        
        
          )
        
        
          
            T
          
        
        
          
            p
          
        
        
          (
        
        
          
            t
          
        
        
          )
        
        
          (1)
        
        
          where
        
        
          
            T
          
        
        
          
            p
          
        
        
          (
        
        
          
            t
          
        
        
          ) [LT
        
        
          -1
        
        
          ] was the normalized root distribution [L
        
        
          -1
        
        
          ],
        
        
          a function of space and time (in the case of root growth). The
        
        
          function
        
        
          α
        
        
          [-] represented the response to plant stress (0
        
        
          ≤ α ≤
        
        
          1), by varying the hydraulic and osmotic head.
        
        
          2.1.2
        
        
          
            Contaminant uptake model
          
        
        
          Roots contaminant uptake, when present, was calculated
        
        
          with models defined as passive and active. The first assume that
        
        
          the solute uptake is locally proportional to root water uptake and
        
        
          the concentration of the solute dissolved in water:
        
        
          
            p(x,t) = s(x,t) c(x,t)
          
        
        
          (2)
        
        
          The active root solute uptake
        
        
          
            a(x,t)
          
        
        
          [ML
        
        
          -3
        
        
          T
        
        
          -1
        
        
          ] was calculated
        
        
          using
        
        
          
            Michaelis-Ment
          
        
        
          en kinetics (Jungk, 2002). The theoretical
        
        
          maximum uptake value was called as potential active solute
        
        
          uptake
        
        
          
            A
          
        
        
          
            p
          
        
        
          (
        
        
          
            t
          
        
        
          ) [ML
        
        
          -2
        
        
          T
        
        
          -1
        
        
          ], characteristic of the pair plant-solute and
        
        
          function of time (Šim
        
        
          ů
        
        
          nek and Hopmans, 2009).
        
        
          ,  = , 
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          + ,  , 
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          (3)
        
        
          
            K
          
        
        
          m
        
        
          was defined as
        
        
          
            Michaelis-Menten constant
          
        
        
          [ML
        
        
          -3
        
        
          ].
        
        
          Applied values were
        
        
          
            K
          
        
        
          
            m
          
        
        
          = 1,32
        
        
          µ
        
        
          g/cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          and
        
        
          
            A
          
        
        
          
            p
          
        
        
          = 0,4757
        
        
          µ
        
        
          g
        
        
          ·
        
        
          cm
        
        
          -2
        
        
          /day for Pb
        
        
          2+
        
        
          .
        
        
          2.1.3
        
        
          
            Soil
          
        
        
          The soil analyzed is a
        
        
          
            Halpic Gleysol
          
        
        
          . In the simulations
        
        
          only the unsaturated zone was modeled. The water table was
        
        
          assumed to have a fixed depth (90 cm). Two horizons were
        
        
          considered:
        
        
          
            A
          
        
        
          , clay and
        
        
          
            C
          
        
        
          , sandy clay loam. The parameters of
        
        
          
            van Genuchten - Mualem hydraulic model
          
        
        
          (van Genuchten,
        
        
          1980) were estimated for each horizon using pedotransfert
        
        
          functions proposed by Tomasella et al. (2003).
        
        
          Table 1. Hydraulic parameters of the
        
        
          
            van Genuchten - Mualem model
          
        
        
          (van Genuchten, 1980) relative to Halpic Gleysol
        
        
          horizon
        
        
          θ
        
        
          
            r
          
        
        
          [cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          /cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          ]
        
        
          θ
        
        
          
            s
          
        
        
          [cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          /cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          ]
        
        
          α
        
        
          [cm
        
        
          -1
        
        
          ]
        
        
          
            n
          
        
        
          [-]
        
        
          
            K
          
        
        
          
            s
          
        
        
          [cm/day]
        
        
          A
        
        
          0.1555
        
        
          0.5688
        
        
          0.0654
        
        
          1.1910
        
        
          61.66
        
        
          C
        
        
          0.0900
        
        
          0.4265
        
        
          0.0450
        
        
          1.3154
        
        
          68.02
        
        
          2.1.4
        
        
          
            Boundary conditions
          
        
        
          The top boundary conditions were imposed using daily
        
        
          values of precipitation, potential evaporation and transpiration.
        
        
          The reference evapotranspiration was determined using the
        
        
          equation of
        
        
          
            Penman-Monteith
          
        
        
          (Allen et al., 1989; Allen et al.,
        
        
          1998).
        
        
          Pressure head
        
        
          
            h
          
        
        
          was considered constant and equal to zero at
        
        
          the bottom of the profile.
        
        
          2.1.5
        
        
          
            Soil-contaminant interaction
          
        
        
          Ion sorption in soil solid phase was considered using a linear
        
        
          model for both horizons. The distribution coefficients (
        
        
          
            K
          
        
        
          
            d
          
        
        
          ) were
        
        
          inferred from a study (Soares, 2004) about tropical soils with
        
        
          similar characteristics, using 1500 cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          /g and 70 cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          /g,
        
        
          respectively, for Pb
        
        
          2+
        
        
          and Zn
        
        
          2+
        
        
          . Standard values for the
        
        
          diffusion coefficients in free water were applied (Shackelford
        
        
          and Daniel, 1991).
        
        
          2.1.6
        
        
          
            Simulation phases
          
        
        
          The numerical simulations were organized in three phases:
        
        
          pre-contamination, contamination and remediation. The first
        
        
          phase (one year) was necessary to fix average pressure head
        
        
          profile. The presence of shrubby vegetation was included in the
        
        
          top
        
        
          
            BC
          
        
        
          .
        
        
          During the contamination phase, the presence of containers,
        
        
          leaching metal ions in presence of rain, was simulated. It was
        
        
          also estimated that the vegetation suffered degradation due to
        
        
          toxicity of the contaminants. Therefore, transpiration values
        
        
          were considered equivalent to 20% of the reference. In this
        
        
          phase, no contaminant uptake was considered. The simulated
        
        
          period was of five years.
        
        
          For remediating the soil, original vegetation was substituted
        
        
          by
        
        
          
            Chrysopogon zizanioides
          
        
        
          . According to the experimental
        
        
          study by Tavares (2009), this variety doesn’t suffer any toxicity
        
        
          effect at considered concentrations. The
        
        
          
            Feddes
          
        
        
          ´ parameters
        
        
          where estimated by analogy with similar plants from
        
        
          
            Poaceae
          
        
        
          family (Wesseling, 1991). The solute uptake model selection
        
        
          and the determination of the relative parameters were performed
        
        
          in Lugli (2011). An active model was used for Pb
        
        
          2+
        
        
          and a
        
        
          passive model for Zn
        
        
          2+
        
        
          . The process was considered complete
        
        
          when the soil concentration of each contaminants would be
        
        
          punctually lower than the Brazilian standard values for
        
        
          industrial areas (CONAMA, 2009) respectively 900 mg/kg and
        
        
          2000 mg/kg for Pb
        
        
          2+
        
        
          and Zn
        
        
          2+
        
        
          .
        
        
          2.2
        
        
          
            Previous studies
          
        
        
          Lugli and Mahler (2012) showed that, by increasing the
        
        
          fraction of contaminant sorbed on the solid phase, the phyto-
        
        
          extraction process became less effective. No relevant
        
        
          consequences were observed in the remediation of Pb
        
        
          2+
        
        
          . For
        
        
          contaminants characterized by low retardation factors (e.g.
        
        
          Zn
        
        
          2+
        
        
          ), the remediation process resulted more efficient.
        
        
          Moreover, water stress partially inhibited contaminant
        
        
          uptake, but prevented plume migration towards water table. The
        
        
          results also showed that phyto-extraction process becomes more
        
        
          efficient by increasing the amount of transpiration at the
        
        
          expense of the portion of evaporation (e.g. increased crop
        
        
          density).
        
        
          In the present study, some results form Lugli and Mahler
        
        
          (2012) were revisited analyzing the influence of root depth. The
        
        
          focus was to study if an engineered choice of plant species in
        
        
          terms of root distribution could promote (or not) an
        
        
          improvement in remediation process. For both Pb
        
        
          2+
        
        
          and Zn
        
        
          2+
        
        
          three different root models were analyzed and compared with
        
        
          the reference (root depth = 40 cm). All of them where static and
        
        
          linear interpolated with the lowest value corresponding to zero;
        
        
          the depth was determined multiplying the plume depth for each
        
        
          contaminant by 2/3, 1 and 1.5.