 
          3098
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          Table 2. The specification of Geotextile
        
        
          items
        
        
          contents
        
        
          type
        
        
          KJV-6000
        
        
          base texture
        
        
          high-strength vinylon
        
        
          width
        
        
          2,000mm
        
        
          weight
        
        
          320g/m
        
        
          2
        
        
          tensile strength
        
        
          59.0kN/m
        
        
          reduction coefficient
        
        
          0.6
        
        
          On the other hand, when the curing time of treated soil is
        
        
          short, it is considered that the strength of base ground is
        
        
          insufficient for the bearing capacity. The base ground, which is
        
        
          composed of tamping layers and Geo-textile, may not have
        
        
          uniformly mechanical behaviors. It is supposed that only Geo-
        
        
          textile resists the overturning moment, which generates from the
        
        
          tower’s load. As a result, it is simulated that Geo
        
        
          -textile will be
        
        
          able to share 26 percent of the total overturning moment. When
        
        
          converting this value to the settlement, it is estimated 40cm.
        
        
          Based on above-mentioned result, Figure 7 shows a decided
        
        
          section for reconstitution of the foundation platform.
        
        
          7CONCLUSION
        
        
          This project has been achieved in May, 2005. After that,
        
        
          monitoring for these structures is being done. Until present after
        
        
          the reconstitution, there is no trouble on them.
        
        
          A consensus, which cultural heritages should be conserved
        
        
          and saved from various collapsing factors, is changing in recent.
        
        
          If modern materials and modern methods will be applied for
        
        
          restoration works of heritages, the historic value on it may be
        
        
          spoiled. Therefore it is demanded that materials and methods
        
        
          for restoration works will not spoil the historic values of
        
        
          heritages. From these viewpoints, a concept about “authenticity
        
        
          and heritage” is discussi
        
        
          ng now, especially on consideration of
        
        
          designing and working for heritage geo-technology.  The
        
        
          authors desire for this paper to become a reference for the same
        
        
          purpose.
        
        
          Figure 7. Decided section for reconstitution of the foundation platform
        
        
          8ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
        
        
          The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to
        
        
          Professor Takeshi Nakagawa of Waseda University. The
        
        
          project, on which this paper is based, was supervised and
        
        
          promoted by him responsible the entire.
        
        
          9REFERENCES
        
        
          Nakagawa T. (Supervisor) 1996-2005. Annual Report on the Technical
        
        
          Survey of Angkor Monument 1995-2004, Japanese Government
        
        
          Team for Safeguarding Angkor (JSA), Japan International
        
        
          Cooperation Center
        
        
          Nakagawa T. (Supervisor). 2005. Report on the Conservation and
        
        
          Restoration Work of the Prasat Suor Prat Tower, Royal Plaza of
        
        
          Angkor Thom, Kingdom of Cambodia, Japanese Government Team
        
        
          for Safeguarding Angkor (JSA), Japan International Cooperation
        
        
          Center.
        
        
          Akazawa Y, Nakagawa T, Mizoguchi A, Nakazawa J, Iwasaki Y,
        
        
          Fukuda M. 2009. Development and reserch of the restoration
        
        
          methods for basement and platform of Prasat Suor Prat Tower N1,
        
        
          AIJ Journal of Technology and Design vol. 30, 567-572.
        
        
          Iwasaki Y, Akazawa Y, Fukuda M, Nakazawa J, Nakagawa K, Shimoda
        
        
          I,  and Nakagawa T. 2013. Dismantling for Reconstitution of N1
        
        
          Tower of Prasat Suor Prat, Angkor Thom, Cambodia (TC 301- IS
        
        
          NAPOLI 2013, Currently, submitted).