 
          3096
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          3.1 Case history
        
        
          N3 tower (one of Prasat Suor Prat) was restored by École
        
        
          française d‘Extrême
        
        
          -Orient in 1950, and its superstructure was
        
        
          dismantled and rebuilt.
        
        
          50 years after its restoration, it inclined once again and
        
        
          structure materials for its openings were broken. It has been
        
        
          recognized that N3 tower is at risk of collapse.  This leaning of
        
        
          N3 tower is supposed to have occurred during restoration work
        
        
          or just after it. It was thought to be caused by fact that
        
        
          superstructure was treated, and its platform and its base ground
        
        
          were not treated.
        
        
          3.2 Survey of existing state
        
        
          The change in N1 tower’s inclination with progressin
        
        
          g time has
        
        
          been monitored by plumbing, however there was no significant
        
        
          change. During the rainy season in October in 1997, when there
        
        
          was wind velocity of over 10m/s blew for a few days, 0.5mm/m
        
        
          of the lateral displacement was measured. Figure 1 shows this
        
        
          monitoring data with inclinations, wind velocity, rainfall and
        
        
          temperature for N1 tower. This fact shows that the tower’s
        
        
          displacement was increased by the external force acting against
        
        
          the tower (in this case, gust wind during rainy season), and this
        
        
          displacements will be accumulated.
        
        
          Figure 1. The measuring results of the amount of inclinations, the wind
        
        
          velocity, precipitation, and temperature of N1 tower.
        
        
          Based on these facts, it is recognized that the foundation
        
        
          platform and the ground under it should be investigated in
        
        
          detail. First, a soil survey by hand auger was carried out, but
        
        
          results of it were insufficient to clarify the soil strata under the
        
        
          platform. It was concluded that the investigation of the tower
        
        
          state should be done by dismantling them, including excavating
        
        
          the base ground. Moreover, it is decided that these results will
        
        
          be used for designing of other ruins’ restoration projects in
        
        
          future.
        
        
          Photo. 2 and Figure 2 show soil strata under the platform of
        
        
          N1 tower. The compacted sandy formation was found from -
        
        
          1.5m from the original ground surface and to +3.5m above the
        
        
          ground, which the average thickness of one stratum was
        
        
          measured about 20cm. Figure 3 shows the grain size
        
        
          distribution curve of them. Figure 4 shows N-value distribution
        
        
          (by using standard penetration test) with depth. In figure white
        
        
          dots show the values in the dry season and the polygonal line
        
        
          shows them in the rainy season.
        
        
          Photo. 2. Soil strata under the platform of N1 tower
        
        
          Figure 2. North-South Section of N1 tower (Before restoration)
        
        
          Figure 3. Grain size distribution curve of each soil
        
        
          The average in-situ dry density of the compacted strata was
        
        
          measured at 1.69g/cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          at center of it and 1.73g/cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          directly
        
        
          under laterite blocks. Because the maximum dry density by
        
        
          Proctor’s compaction test was measured at 1.88g/cm
        
        
          3
        
        
          , these
        
        
          compacting layers were assumed to have been tamped with
        
        
          about 90% on degree of compaction.
        
        
          Plate bearing in-situ test of plate loading on original
        
        
          compacted sandy ground showed the yield load of 290 - 340
        
        
          kN/m
        
        
          2
        
        
          under wet condition. Since the contact pressure in the
        
        
          ground beneath the foundation of the tower was estimated at
        
        
          270kN/m
        
        
          2
        
        
          , the safety factor against the ground bearing capacity
        
        
          in rainy season was calculated at SF=1.1, which was considered
        
        
          as small and not safe. When the external force acts on the tower
        
        
          in the rainy season, the inclination, the subsidence and the
        
        
          differential settlement of them will increase.
        
        
          Figure 4. N-value distribution
        
        
          4CONSTRUCTION METHOD
        
        
          The principle for this reconstitution is to adopt the original
        
        
          tamping method for excavated original soils. However, if the
        
        
          bearing layers are reconstituted by the original tamping method
        
        
          with original soils, their bearing capacities will be same as
        
        
          original states and capacity reduction in rainy season will not be
        
        
          avoided. When constructed with the original excavated soil, it is
        
        
          concluded that it should be improved with some stabilizing
        
        
          materials for soils.
        
        
          In the case of surface soil stabilization in place, Portland
        
        
          cement or hydrated lime is used as a hardening agent. Hydrated
        
        
          lime should be accepted for this case, because it is easy to buy it
        
        
          near the jobsite and to handle it for working. Moreover it is used
        
        
          for long time.
        
        
          N value and Presumed N value
        
        
          B-No.5
        
        
          (94 rainy season)
        
        
          BY1A
        
        
          (95 dry season)
        
        
          Depth (GL-m)