 
          952
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          vibratory tremie) full scale piles constructed for performance
        
        
          tests which indicated promising results in comparison to the
        
        
          piles installed by conventional technique.
        
        
          16 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          The extent of impregnation and smear zone surrounding
        
        
          borehole is a function of the soil properties and installation
        
        
          technique. Impregnation of cementitious slurry alters the
        
        
          physico-chemical characteristics of soil within the impregnated
        
        
          zone and upon setting strengthens smear zone within the
        
        
          impregnated depth. Cement-impregnated soil becoming a part
        
        
          of the cast in-situ deep foundation is almost certain. The
        
        
          resulting larger effective diameter is causing potential threat
        
        
          from negative shaft resistance. However, its positive
        
        
          contribution enhances shaft resistance vis-à-vis design
        
        
          economy. Due to the opposing nature of smear and cemented-
        
        
          soil characteristics, soil-structure interface strength depends on
        
        
          the properties of partially remoulded soil at the potential rupture
        
        
          surface, location of which is dictated by the depth of
        
        
          impregnation. Using newly developed simulation device soil
        
        
          samples from various auger-boreholes were impregnated at 1
        
        
          and 2 Kg/cm
        
        
          2
        
        
          slurry pressure. Microscopic observations on
        
        
          impregnated samples were not found promising for
        
        
          determination of the extents of smear and impregnation.
        
        
          Modified staining technique enabled mapping of impregnation
        
        
          profile for determination of maximum and average
        
        
          impregnation depths. Although both impregnation depths
        
        
          increase with increase in slurry pressure, their plots with
        
        
          common soil parameters revealed no definite trends. In the plots
        
        
          of impregnation depth with composite parameter D
        
        
          50
        
        
          ×e, which
        
        
          is a measure of both pore size and overall void ratio, no mean
        
        
          line could be drawn for maximum impregnation, however,
        
        
          impregnation rendered model of
        
        
          s location of rupture surface for
        
        
          onstruction of prototypes, performance of which were found to
        
        
          be promising..
        
        
          17 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
        
        
          In order to supplement a research (Sarma, 2000), Mr. A. Deb
        
        
          undertook detailed investigation on impregnation (Deb, 1995)
        
        
          implementing the scheme and using the device developed by the
        
        
          Author
        
        
          1
        
        
          . His support is gratefully acknowledged. The
        
        
          experimental investigations referred to in this paper were part of
        
        
          Author
        
        
          1
        
        
          ’s PhD work (Sarma, 2000), which were conducted
        
        
          under the supervision of Prof. P. K. Bora, PhD (Birmingham),
        
        
          Head of Civil Engineering (Retired), Assam Engineering
        
        
          College, India. His encouragement is gratefully acknowledged.
        
        
          regression analysis for average
        
        
          straight line. The model indicate
        
        
          auger bored soil-structure interface that can be used for
        
        
          determination of shaft resistance. Further due to linear
        
        
          shrinkage the progressive collapse (strain-softening) may occur
        
        
          at the rupture surface or at the interface when impregnation is
        
        
          not prominent. This may be detrimental particularly for higher
        
        
          diameter shafts. The maximum unit shaft resistance is possible
        
        
          when the depth of smear is less and remains within
        
        
          impregnation depth. In order to minimise the extent of smear
        
        
          zone, new equipments were fabricated, patented, and used for
        
        
          c
        
        
          18 REFERENCES
        
        
          Berezentzav, V.G. 1965, Design of Deep Foundation. 6th ICSMFE,
        
        
          Vol. 2.
        
        
          Bowles, J.E. 1982. Foundation Analysis and Design. Third Edition.
        
        
          McGraw-Hill.
        
        
          Bowles, J.E. 1988. Foundation Analysis and Design. Fourth Edition.
        
        
          McGraw-Hill.
        
        
          Dev, A. 1995. A Study of Adhesion Factor of Bored and Cast In-place
        
        
          Piles in Cohesive Soils. M.E. thesis submitted to Gauhati
        
        
          University.
        
        
          Hutchison, G.S. 1974. Laboratory Handbook of Petrographic
        
        
          Techniques. First Edition, Wiley Inter-science Publication. New
        
        
          York.
        
        
          I.S: 456-1978, Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plain and
        
        
          Reinforced Concrete. Third Revision, March 1987, Bureau of
        
        
          Indian Standard, New Delhi.
        
        
          Meyerhoff, G.G. 1976. Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile
        
        
          Foundations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE.
        
        
          Vol. 102, GT3.
        
        
          Nevile, A.M. 1981. Properties of Concrete. Third Edition, ELBS.
        
        
          Sarma, D. 1992. Bored and Cast In-situ MRP - A New Approach in Pile
        
        
          Foundation, M.E. thesis submitted to Gauhati University.
        
        
          Sarma, D. 2000. Bored Cast In-situ Pile with CSR - A New Approach in
        
        
          Pile Foundation,. PhD Thesis, University of Gauhati, Assam,
        
        
          Republic of India.
        
        
          Sowers, G.F. 1979. Introductory Soil Mechanics & Foundations:
        
        
          Geotechnical Engineering, Fourth Edition. Collier Macmillan
        
        
          International.