 
          948
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          of the objectives of the research (Sarma, 2000) to evaluate the
        
        
          depth of smear zone, intensity of smear, and effect of
        
        
          impregnation under laboratory test conditions.
        
        
          4 IMPREGNATION AND ITS EFFECT ON INTERFACE
        
        
          STRENGTH
        
        
          Fresh concrete forces the softened/loosened soil partially
        
        
          outward from the borehole owing to its larger unit weight and
        
        
          pressure head developed during placement and concreting
        
        
          operations. This creates further disturbances to the soils.
        
        
          Specific gravity of the fresh concrete being higher than that of
        
        
          the in-situ soil and due to positive pressure developed
        
        
          particularly in tremie action cementitious slurry, which is one of
        
        
          the constituents of the fresh concrete, always exists at higher
        
        
          than the ground water pressure unless an artesian flow of higher
        
        
          order reverse the situation. Therefore, in general, a tendency for
        
        
          impregnation of cementitious slurry from the body of the
        
        
          freshly cast deep foundation towards the less stressed zone
        
        
          surrounding the borehole always exists until a state of
        
        
          equilibrium of slurry pressure in the pores of surrounding soil is
        
        
          attained. Such impregnation of cementitious slurry alters the
        
        
          physico-chemical characteristics of soil within the impregnated
        
        
          zone and upon setting strengthens smear/distortion zone within
        
        
          the impregnation depth.
        
        
          5 MOBILISATION OF SHAFT RESISTANCE
        
        
          The philosophy of soil-structure interface strength based on the
        
        
          effect of distortion or smear zone and impregnation of
        
        
          cementitious slurry together, can be visualised in the following
        
        
          way:
        
        
          Figure 1 (a). Idealised profiles at soil-structure interface, cemented
        
        
          rength
        
        
          egnated strength of soil is lower
        
        
          an its undisturbed strength
        
        
          , cemented
        
        
          rength less than undistur
        
        
          tial remoulded strength
        
        
          dep
        
        
          y be idealised within the
        
        
          ext
        
        
          te due to the
        
        
          com
        
        
          to stabilise the borehole,
        
        
          ffective
        
        
          dia
        
        
          st
        
        
          more than undisturbed strength (After Sarma, 1992)
        
        
          It was asserted that the impregnated cement slurry improves
        
        
          the shear strength of part of the distortion zone surrounding cast
        
        
          in-situ deep foundation (Sarma, 1992). Also during curing,
        
        
          concrete absorbs moisture from the surrounding soil and thus
        
        
          soil gets consolidated to give better strength. This gain in
        
        
          strength diminishes with increasing distance from the
        
        
          foundation. On the other hand, intensity of remoulding /
        
        
          loosening effect that causes shear strength to decrease in the
        
        
          surrounding soil reduces away from the foundation. Hence the
        
        
          rupture surface for mobilisation of shaft resistance does not
        
        
          exactly lie at the interface of the concrete of the foundation and
        
        
          soil. It is possible that the weakest surface may exists away
        
        
          from the body of foundation as a result of the two opposing
        
        
          effects mentioned above. Therefore soil up to the weakest
        
        
          surface may adhere to the foundation surface behaving as its
        
        
          integral part. In such a case slip or local yield that occur when
        
        
          the shear stress reaches the adhesive (or yield) strength may not
        
        
          occur at soil-structure interface rather between adhered and
        
        
          surrounding soil. Two different possibilities have been
        
        
          presented. Fig. 1(a) portrays potential rupture surface in case
        
        
          cement impregnated strength of soil is higher than its
        
        
          undisturbed strength and Fig. 1(b) portrays potential rupture
        
        
          surface in case cement impr
        
        
          th
        
        
          Figure 1(b). Idealised profiles at soil-structure interface
        
        
          st
        
        
          bed strength (After Sarma, 1992)
        
        
          In both the figures soil-structure interface shear strength is
        
        
          presented in the ordinates. Therefore, any point towards left of
        
        
          the ordinates will represent the body of foundation. The profile
        
        
          of the shear strength of soil due to the effect of smear is shown
        
        
          with minimum remoulding strength at the soil-structure
        
        
          interface where extent of smear is maximum and strength
        
        
          increases away from the interface. It will be undisturbed shear
        
        
          strength at the end of smear zone due to the diminishing affect
        
        
          of smear. Any point at the profile of shear strength of soil
        
        
          within smear zone will represent par
        
        
          ending upon the severity of smear.
        
        
          On the other hand cemented soil strength, i.e., soil shear
        
        
          strength due to the effect of impregnation of cementitious
        
        
          material, will be maximum at the soil-structure interface. The
        
        
          cemented soil strength has a diminishing trend away from the
        
        
          body of the foundation up to the remoulded shear strength of
        
        
          soil at the end of impregnation. This ma
        
        
          ent of average impregnation depth.
        
        
          The combined effect of cemented soil strength, which has
        
        
          diminishing tendency, and remoulded shear strength which has
        
        
          increasing tendency from the body, may act as the mobilised
        
        
          shear strength of soil surrounding the shaft. It is clear from the
        
        
          figure that potential rupture surface exists at the point where
        
        
          mobilised shear strength attains a minimum value. The soil up
        
        
          to the potential rupture surface will act as a part of the shaft that
        
        
          affects increased diameter. With the fact that the potential
        
        
          rupture surface exists away from the shaft, the average shear
        
        
          strength of the soil within the impregnated zone may be either
        
        
          lower or higher than that of the undisturbed sta
        
        
          bined effect of smear and cemented strength.
        
        
          While formulating the philosophy of this radical concept of
        
        
          soil-structure interface strength it is considered that the depth of
        
        
          impregnation is less than the depth of smear. The depth of
        
        
          impregnation being more than the depth of smear is possible
        
        
          only in case of granular soil. This is ruled-out as bentonite
        
        
          slurry, which is generally used
        
        
          impregnates prior to cement slurry.
        
        
          6 FIELD EVIDENCES OF IMPREGNATION
        
        
          Piles pulled out of soil frequently appear with a skin of soil
        
        
          sometime several mm thick adhering tightly to the surface of the
        
        
          pile thus becoming a part of the pile itself (Bowles, 1988). Field
        
        
          evidence of such a phenomenon was noticed and reconfirmed
        
        
          by this author too during excavation for construction of deep
        
        
          pile caps. Due to soil adhering to the pile surface the e
        
        
          meter, at which shaft resistance mobilises, increases.
        
        
          Field investigation reveals that soil becoming a part of pile,
        
        
          with a thick skin of adhered soil, is prominent in case of cast in-