 
          1226
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          lumped mass, which hits the impact foot after a free fall. The
        
        
          initial velocity of the impact foot, which excites the
        
        
          underground, was derived assuming an idealized elastic impact
        
        
          between falling weight and the mass of the impact foot. The soil
        
        
          medium was modeled as homogenous, isotropic, and rate-
        
        
          independent elastoplastic halfspace based on Mohr-Coulomb
        
        
          theory with isotropic hardening. The axially symmetric impact
        
        
          foot made of steel rests on the surface of the halfspace. A
        
        
          sliding interface between the foot and the soil was adopted, i.e.
        
        
          only normal stresses are transferred between the foot and the
        
        
          soil. The numerical model takes advantage of the rotational
        
        
          symmetry of this subsystem, which is divided into a near-field
        
        
          and a far-field. The near-field was discretized by means of
        
        
          Finite Elements. Infinite Elements model the far-field in order
        
        
          to avoid wave reflections at the boundary between the near- and
        
        
          far-field, and to allow for energy propagation into the semi-
        
        
          infinite halfspace. The model and its parameters are described in
        
        
          more detail in Adam et al. (2010).
        
        
          As an example, Figure 1 shows the peak velocity magnitude
        
        
          v
        
        
          R,max
        
        
          with respect to the distance of the compaction point for
        
        
          the subsoil condition silty fine sand after the first, third, fifth,
        
        
          and tenth compaction pass. The outcomes of this figure prove
        
        
          field observations that the pronounced increase of v
        
        
          R,max
        
        
          after
        
        
          each compaction impact leads to a parallel shift of the
        
        
          regression line, and thus, the arbitrary assumed limit value of
        
        
          10 mm/s is shifted to a larger distance from the compaction
        
        
          point.
        
        
          Figure 1. Magnitude of maximum resultant surface velocity as function
        
        
          of the distance from the impact foot after a specified number of
        
        
          compaction impacts applied to an elastoplastic silty fine sand.
        
        
          Figure 2. Distribution of the velocity magnitude at two specified
        
        
          instants after the first compaction impact. Elastoplastic silty fine sand.
        
        
          Figure 2 shows the propagation of the velocity magnitude at
        
        
          two instants after the first impact is applied to the subsoil
        
        
          condition silty fine sand. Spherical propagation of the waves
        
        
          can be observed. Comparison of Figure 15(a) and Figure 15(b)
        
        
          prove that geometric damping leads to a rapid decay of the
        
        
          response amplitudes. According to Figure 15(b) the maximum
        
        
          peak velocities develop at the soil surface, because Rayleigh
        
        
          waves have the largest energy content. Furthermore, the faster
        
        
          propagating P-waves can be distinguished from the slower S-
        
        
          waves. According to the characteristics of P-waves in zones
        
        
          between compression and dilatation the velocities are zero.
        
        
          The effect of compaction and the compaction depth have
        
        
          been investigated, because these properties serve to define the
        
        
          application fields of the Impact Compactor with respect to soil
        
        
          type and soil stratification. In numerical studies it was assumed
        
        
          that the equivalent plastic strain is the characteristic parameter
        
        
          for evaluation of the compaction depth. A threshold of 0.02
        
        
          separates the compacted space from the non-compacted subsoil.
        
        
          After each impact in the compaction zone the soil properties
        
        
          were modified. Here, an isotropic hardening constitutive model
        
        
          was used for an engineering-like approximation of soil
        
        
          compaction.
        
        
          Figure 3 shows the expansion of the equivalent plastic
        
        
          strains in a cross-section of homogeneous silty fine sand below
        
        
          the impact point after the first and tenth compaction pass. The
        
        
          colored area within the outer contour is considered as
        
        
          compaction zone. The largest equivalent plastic strains occur
        
        
          below the boundary of the compaction foot. The domains of
        
        
          equal plastic strains, i.e. the domains of equal degree of
        
        
          compaction, show the shape of a “stress bubble”. It can be seen
        
        
          that in this example the soil is compacted laterally and
        
        
          downwards with approximately the same magnitude. A thin
        
        
          surface layer shows as well distinct equivalent plastic strains,
        
        
          which are induced by Rayleigh waves. After the tenth impact
        
        
          the compaction depth is about 4.3 m.
        
        
          Figure 3. Spread of the equivalent plastic strain after the first (left) and
        
        
          after tenth compaction impact (right). Elastoplastic silty fine sand.
        
        
          2.2
        
        
          
            Field experiments
          
        
        
          Field tests on different soil conditions were performed to verify
        
        
          theoretically derived outcomes. Moreover, they provide the
        
        
          basis for the optimized and economic application of this
        
        
          compaction method in the field.
        
        
          Experimental results and field investigations confirm the
        
        
          trends of the presented numerical outcomes (see chapter 3).
        
        
          3 DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION
        
        
          3.1
        
        
          
            GPS-based recording system
          
        
        
          The Impact Compactors are provided with a monitoring system.
        
        
          The compaction monitor is a kit of parts, which can be coupled
        
        
          to the compaction device in order to record the performance of
        
        
          the hammer and the rate of ground improvement. The following
        
        
          parameters are automatically recorded during the compaction
        
        
          process and monitored from the cab with an on-board data
        
        
          acquisition system (see Figure 4):
        
        
          
        
        
          number of blows
        
        
          
        
        
          final settlement at the last blow
        
        
          
        
        
          total settlement (depth of the compaction crater)
        
        
          
        
        
          compaction energy
        
        
          
        
        
          average number of blows
        
        
          In addition to these parameters a more novel device monitors
        
        
          electronically the coordinates of the compaction points, date,
        
        
          and time for each compaction point during the compaction
        
        
          process, and all data are documented via GPS controlled data
        
        
          acquisition (see Figure 4).
        
        
          GPS-based data recording during the compaction process
        
        
          and the online display in the operator’s cab facilitates
        
        
          compaction control, an economic application of the compaction