386
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          (e.g., Dyvik and Olsen (1991), Zeng and Ni (1998), Lee and
        
        
          Santamarina (2005), Lee et al. (2007)). The bender element tip-
        
        
          to-tip separation is 6.2 cm, yielding a ratio of test specimen
        
        
          diameter to sensor separation of approximately 2.45. The
        
        
          sample height is 15.8 cm. Figure 2 contains a view of the test
        
        
          system including key ancillary equipment.
        
        
          Glass beads used for the granular testing matrix are 0.5 mm
        
        
          in diameter. Consideration is given to optimize uniformity and
        
        
          repeatability of the placement of the glass beads, in order to
        
        
          minimize unwanted acoustic impedance contrasts in the
        
        
          medium, to discourage preferential fluid flow pathways, and to
        
        
          facilitate comparisons among tests.  The oven-dried glass beads
        
        
          are vibrated into place using a vibratory table operating at 60 Hz
        
        
          for 20 minutes with a surcharge load of 28 kg. The surcharge
        
        
          mass was selected based on the methodology laid out by ASTM
        
        
          D4253 - 00(2006) Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index
        
        
          Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table. The
        
        
          surcharge mass is kept in place throughout testing. It
        
        
          approximates a vertical overburden stress of 15 kPa.
        
        
          The glass beads are flooded with de-ionized (DI) water
        
        
          which is introduced through upward flow distributed across the
        
        
          cross-section of the experimental column.  The water is plumed
        
        
          into the bottom of the test chamber to reduce the amount of
        
        
          entrapped air and is plumed under gravity flow with total head
        
        
          not exceeding 0.3 meters. The fluid-flow gradient is kept low to
        
        
          discourage entrainment of air bubbles and approximate laminar
        
        
          flow. The fluid passes through a set of baffles and a perforated
        
        
          disc before entering the sample (Figure 1). This process is
        
        
          intended to encourage a uniform wetting front and discourage
        
        
          fingering and the formation of preferential flow pathways. A
        
        
          somewhat loose-fitting top cap allows the cell to be completely
        
        
          flooded
        
        
          and allows the overburden stress to act directly on the
        
        
          specimen
        
        
          .  Excess water exits the test apparatus through a port
        
        
          above the cap. Satisfactory dispersion of liquid through the
        
        
          glass-bead-filled test chamber was demonstrated using colored
        
        
          dye (Figure 3). The capacity of the fluid-delivery system
        
        
          including test cell is approximately 1.7 liters.
        
        
          Data are collected with a Data Physics (Data Physics, Inc.)
        
        
          dynamic signal analyzer.  Single sine pulses are created using a
        
        
          function generator. The sampling interval is 9.301
        
        
          microseconds. The signal is not filtered during data capture.
        
        
          The reported result is an average from 350 pulses, which are
        
        
          repeated at 0.7-second intervals.
        
        
          3 BASELINE TESTING
        
        
          Through resonance testing and experimental trials, optimum
        
        
          frequencies to test for shear and compression were determined
        
        
          to be 1 kHz and 8 kHz, respectively. The compression
        
        
          measurements have not yet been resolved satisfactorily because
        
        
          of complications with electrical crosstalk between source and
        
        
          receiver and are not presented here. Results of baseline testing
        
        
          for shear (using DI water, with no experimental treatment) are
        
        
          shown in Figure 4. Four datasets are collected. The first dataset
        
        
          is collected after initial inundation of the sample. Repeat
        
        
          collections occur after 4, 8 and 12 additional liters of DI water
        
        
          are flushed through the sample. The time history from the initial
        
        
          measurement is dramatically different from those collected
        
        
          later. Results demonstrate that up to four liters of fluid need to
        
        
          be flushed through the system before the response stabilizes.
        
        
          The flushing process is likely to improve the signal by expelling
        
        
          entrained air.
        
        
          The zero time in Figure 4 corresponds to source initiation.
        
        
          Based on first arrival by visual interpretation, the shear wave
        
        
          velocity of the specimen is approximately 170 m/s.
        
        
          Considering the timing for the first troughs in the signals,
        
        
          velocity estimates among the three measurements (after flushing
        
        
          4, 8 and 12 liters of DI water) would vary by approximately +/-
        
        
          3 %. Amplitudes at the first trough vary by +/- 17%.
        
        
          4 NANOPARTICLE EFFECTS
        
        
          The test sequence was repeated on a new sample, in which a
        
        
          solution of 0.05% (by weight) nZnO solution was introduced.
        
        
          The nanoparticle treatment solution is made through sonication
        
        
          to uniformly disperse the nanoparticles in DI water.  Eight liters
        
        
          of clean DI water were flushed through the test chamber first,
        
        
          followed by 4 liters of the nanoparticle solution.
        
        
          Results are shown in Figure 5. Again, the dataset conducted
        
        
          before flushing was not representative of results after flushing.
        
        
          The time histories collected after flushing but before
        
        
          introducing the nZnO treatment would ideally be the same as
        
        
          those collected in the baseline test.  However, comparison with
        
        
          Fig. 4 demonstrates that the tests are not closely repeatable
        
        
          between samples, despite careful efforts to replicate test
        
        
          conditions.  For example, consider the difference in signal
        
        
          amplitude between the two figures. This is an unfortunate
        
        
          discrepancy that requires further investigation. From Figure 5,
        
        
          considering the time histories gathered after flushing 4 and 8
        
        
          liters of DI water, the shear wave velocity is approximately 150
        
        
          m/s, which represents a decrease of 12 % with respect to
        
        
          baseline (Figure 4). Also, for the later test (Figure 5), results do
        
        
          not stabilize as fluid flushing occurs to the extent seen in
        
        
          baseline testing. Repeating analyses of the timing and amplitude
        
        
          of the first trough, velocity estimates among the measurements
        
        
          after flushing 4 and 8 liters would vary by approximately +/- 9
        
        
          % and amplitudes by +/- 3 %. With respect to the baseline test,
        
        
          the percentage variabilities are higher for velocity and lower for
        
        
          amplitude.
        
        
          Despite the variability observed with DI water, the trial
        
        
          conducted after introducing the nZnO experimental treatment
        
        
          (labeled in Figure 5 as “12”) shows distinctly different results
        
        
          from those collected earlier on the same test specimen. Signal
        
        
          amplitude is dramatically increased, and timing is delayed. To
        
        
          effectively quantify differences, cross-correlation of traces,
        
        
          signal matching or coda wave analysis might be applied (Lee
        
        
          and Santamarina 2005, Dai et al. 2012).
        
        
          The significant increase in signal amplitude might be due to
        
        
          agglomeration of nZnO onto the glass bead matrix (Klaine et.
        
        
          al., 2008) which would enhance contacts in the skeletal
        
        
          structure of the glass bead matrix, thereby reducing signal
        
        
          attenuation.  The smaller decrease in velocity is not as readily
        
        
          explained. One hypothesis (which is yet untested) is that the
        
        
          flushing process allows sufficient displacement of the glass
        
        
          beads to permit introduction of nanoparticles between contacts.
        
        
          This possibility seems unlikely given the slow influent flow rate
        
        
          and the amplitude of the surcharge pressure.
        
        
          5 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          A laboratory apparatus has been developed to study seismic
        
        
          response to the presence of nanoparticles dispersed in the pore
        
        
          fluid of saturated granular media. Uniform placement of the
        
        
          solid sample matrix is encouraged through the use of a vibratory
        
        
          table and a surcharge load.  A perforated plate and baffle system
        
        
          for introduction of fluid at the bottom of the test cell encourage
        
        
          laminar flow and uniform fluid distribution which is
        
        
          demonstrated using dye. Baseline testing in clean water using
        
        
          sine pulses at 1 kHz, chosen to optimize transmission of shear
        
        
          energy, demonstrated that by first flushing several liters of fluid
        
        
          through the sample, repeated measurements would yield similar
        
        
          results.  Testing a new sample demonstrated that close
        
        
          repeatability of results is not assured between samples.
        
        
          The measurements revealed sensitivity of the nanoparticle
        
        
          treatment to shear wave energy propagation. After flushing a
        
        
          sample with a treatment containing 0.05% nZnO, measurements
        
        
          revealed a dramatic increase in signal amplitude and a slight
        
        
          increase in travel time. Changes might be due to agglomeration
        
        
          of nanoparticles on the granular matrix which enhances grain-
        
        
          to-grain contacts, possibly coupled with insertion of
        
        
          nanoparticles between grains which reduce system stiffness.
        
        
          Further experimentation is required to assess if the observed
        
        
          responses are indeed trends. Once accomplished, the research
        
        
          will expand to increase experimental sensitivity and broaden
        
        
          scope, and to more closely approximate conditions in nature.