 
          3424
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          The smouldering leads to high temperatures inside the dump.
        
        
          These high temperatures imply a high energy potential, which
        
        
          isn’t utilized until now. For determining the possible heat output
        
        
          from a smouldering a pilot plant on a mining dump in the ‘Ruhr
        
        
          Area’ in the western part of Germany has been operated over
        
        
          three years. An overview of the dump and the pilot plant is
        
        
          shown in Figure 1.
        
        
          Three heat exchanging fields have been installed. Each field
        
        
          consists of a borehole heat exchangers (BHE) - designed as a
        
        
          coaxial probe – and five temperature measuring gauges,
        
        
          arranged in a semicircle around the BHE. Additional
        
        
          information on the plant can be found in Kürten et al. (2010).
        
        
          The heat exchanging fields were placed in a known Hot Spot
        
        
          (HS 6 in Figure 1). The maximum temperatures in each field
        
        
          varied between 75 °C (field 1) and 430 °C (field 2). The
        
        
          maximum values occurred in about 15m depth. So, the high
        
        
          energy potential of the dump can be confirmed.
        
        
          Several Thermal Response Tests (determining the short-term
        
        
          behaviour of the plant, see e.g. Gehlin 2002) as well as long-
        
        
          term test were carried out. Additional, numerical simulations
        
        
          and analytical investigations were performed for estimating the
        
        
          main influencing parameters for the heat output. It could be
        
        
          shown, that a total heat output for the plant of 8kW could be
        
        
          achieved (Kürten et al. 2010). This corresponds to a heat
        
        
          requirement of two single family houses in Germany,
        
        
          approximately
        
        
          .
        
        
          3 THERMO-ACTIVE SEAL PANELS
        
        
          Based on the principle of thermo-active earth-coupled structures
        
        
          (e.g. Brandl 2006) thermo-active seal panels have been
        
        
          developed by the Chair of Geotechnical Engineering at RWTH
        
        
          Aachen University. For this, the required heat exchanging pipes
        
        
          were integrated in concrete protection plates made of PE-HD
        
        
          (PolyEthylene with High Density). Due to the thin plate the
        
        
          elements are characterized by a nearly contact to the ground.
        
        
          Furthermore, the wiring of the heat exchanging pipes is very
        
        
          flexible. The principle of the thermo-active seal panels is shown
        
        
          in Figure 2.
        
        
          Figure 2. Principle of the thermo-active seal-panel
        
        
          The main applications for the thermo-active seal panels will
        
        
          be underground structures with direct contact to groundwater. In
        
        
          this case a sealing of the structure is necessary anyway. By
        
        
          thermal activation of the system two functions (sealing and
        
        
          energetic function) can be combined. So, the additional
        
        
          installations costs for the geothermal plant are relatively low
        
        
          comparing to a common BHE.
        
        
          The efficiency of the thermo-active seal panels was tested in
        
        
          large scale laboratory tests under different condition. The
        
        
          determined heat output varied between 30 W/m² and 300 W/m²,
        
        
          whereby the higher values correspond to high flow rates in the
        
        
          heat exchanging system. The reason for this is that higher flow
        
        
          rates lead to a turbulent flow in the pipes and thereby to a better
        
        
          heat transfer between fluid and pipe. Additional, the thermal
        
        
          resistance of the system was measured approximately. The
        
        
          achieved values varied between 0.03 (mK)/W and 0.3 (mK)/W
        
        
          depending on the boundary and system conditions. According to
        
        
          the heat output the lowest values (optimum) belong to high flow
        
        
          rates.
        
        
          In the laboratory tests different boundary conditions and
        
        
          system conditions were tested. The results have shown, that the
        
        
          decisive parameters for the heat output are the heat transmission
        
        
          area (characterized especially by the pipe distance, the leg
        
        
          distance between inflow and return flow and the pipe diameter),
        
        
          the flow rate in the heat exchanging system and the soil
        
        
          conditions (especially soil type, temperature, groundwater).
        
        
          More details can be found in Kürten et al. (2012).
        
        
          4 HEAT TRANSFER BETWEEN GEOTHERMAL
        
        
          SYSTEM AND SUBSOIL
        
        
          4.1
        
        
          
            Fundamentals
          
        
        
          For the planning and design of near surface geothermal plants
        
        
          the possible heat output of the systems for the existing boundary
        
        
          conditions has to be known. Empirical values are documented in
        
        
          the German guideline VDI 4640-2 (2009). These values are
        
        
          only valid for borehole heat exchangers and small installations
        
        
          (up to 30kW) as well as homogeneous conditions. For any other
        
        
          cases numerical simulations are necessary to guaranty a high
        
        
          efficiency of the system. Direct simulations (finite element
        
        
          methods, finite difference methods, etc.) are complicated and
        
        
          computationally very demanding. The reason is that the
        
        
          necessary scale (in time and space) for the explicit simulation of
        
        
          the heat exchanger and the simulation of the heat transport in
        
        
          the soil is different in a large order of magnitude. So, new
        
        
          methods are needed to reduce simulation time and the
        
        
          complexity of the model without losing accuracy.
        
        
          One idea, which often has been used in the last years, is the
        
        
          transformation of the different processes to thermal resistances.
        
        
          The different thermal resistances can be superposed to a total
        
        
          thermal resistance. Then, the heat flow between geothermal
        
        
          system and soil can be calculated as the product of the total
        
        
          thermal resistance and the effective temperature difference. For
        
        
          the overall system the difference between soil and fluid
        
        
          temperature has to be used.
        
        
          The difficulty in describing the heat transfer from the soil
        
        
          and the geothermal systems is therefore coupled to the accurate
        
        
          formulation of the total resistance of the systems.  This value
        
        
          has to be formulated for each system depending on the relevant
        
        
          conditions. In the following the approach used for the BHE as
        
        
          well as the principles of a new model for plane structures
        
        
          developed by the authors will be shown.
        
        
          4.2
        
        
          
            Heat transfer model for BHE
          
        
        
          In common literature many calculation models for the thermal
        
        
          resistance of a symmetrical system (such as BHEs) are
        
        
          documented and implemented in several software programs.
        
        
          Most of them are based on the work of Hellström (1991) as well
        
        
          as the applied model for determining the decisive parameters for
        
        
          the heat output from smouldering. A detailed model description
        
        
          can be found in Mottaghy and Dijkshoorn (2012). In the model
        
        
          the BHE is assumed as a 1D-Line-Element, which is integrated
        
        
          in a Finite-Difference-Mesh. The processes inside the BHE are
        
        
          modelled with the help of thermal resistances. The coupling
        
        
          with the software program is realized by passing over
        
        
          temperature boundary condition and heat flow rates. The model
        
        
          is implemented in the Finite-Difference-Program SHEMAT
        
        
          (Simulator for heat and mass transfer, see Clauser 2003). The
        
        
          program can simulate coupled heat and mass transfer (e.g.
        
        
          groundwater flow) and it has been proven for the simulation of
        
        
          geothermal systems.
        
        
          Fundamentally, the thermal resistance for a coaxial probe
        
        
          depends on the pipe-diameter (inner and outer pipe), the pipe
        
        
          material, the flow rate, the heat exchanging medium and the