 
          1577
        
        
          Technical Committee 203 /
        
        
          
            Comité technique 203
          
        
        
          were performed under regulated vacuum confinment of about
        
        
          95 kPa. A typical testing sequence was as follows:
        
        
          1. Prepare sample by pluviating through tube into split
        
        
          mold and membranes. Assemble remaining parts of device
        
        
          while under vacuum, then remove inner and outer split
        
        
          molds.
        
        
          2. Perform low-amplitude RC (γ≈10
        
        
          -4
        
        
          %) versus time
        
        
          (1,2,5,10,20 min...) to asses duration-of-confinement effects,
        
        
          if any.
        
        
          3. Perform TOSS uniform cyclic test at low amplitude
        
        
          (τ=10 kPa) for 200 cycles of loading. Record and inspect
        
        
          hysteresis loops.
        
        
          4. Perform low amplitude RC to asses any changes to
        
        
          G
        
        
          max
        
        
          due to TOSS loading.
        
        
          5. Repeat (3),(4) by increasing TOSS stress level until
        
        
          specimen fails or device reaches maximum displacement.
        
        
          Usually steps of Δτ=10kPa were chosen.
        
        
          For an irregular loading history, the same sequence was
        
        
          followed where the absolute value of peak stress was gradually
        
        
          increased for each stage.
        
        
          3.2
        
        
          
            Test Results
          
        
        
          Preliminary tests have examined several behavior phenomena
        
        
          discussed in the literature. Among the aims of these tests were
        
        
          to shed light on several questions.
        
        
          1. Can very different sorts of tests yield similar fundamental
        
        
          properties, namely shear wave velocity?  Results from many
        
        
          tests have shown that the low amplitude shear wave velocity
        
        
          measured from RC tests and bender element tests in a triaxial
        
        
          cell are identical (Anka 2012).
        
        
          2.  How do TOSS and RC results compare vs. strain level?
        
        
          The testing so far has shown that, in the strain range where both
        
        
          are effective and accurate, they produce the same results. RC
        
        
          tests can measure modulus as much lower strain levels than
        
        
          TOSS. At very high strains, TOSS measurements of damping
        
        
          are much easier to obtain, as resonance is difficult to maintain at
        
        
          strains near failure. Since the TOSS device can be strain-
        
        
          controlled, the operator may closely monitor behavior near
        
        
          failure and avert collapse. Examples or RC test results are
        
        
          shown in Figure 3 where two sets of modulus reduction and
        
        
          damping sequences are shown. Data can be further processed to
        
        
          include reference strain. The advantage of using a
        
        
          dimensionless strain is that confinement effects are eliminated.
        
        
          Shown in Figure 4 are four such tests where confining stresses
        
        
          ranged from 50 to 200 kPa.
        
        
          Results of a  TOSS cyclic test are shown in Figure 5. Each
        
        
          loop corresponds to a different peak shear stress level. Note the
        
        
          changes in secant modulus as the strain levels increase.
        
        
          Additionally hysteretic damping also increases with increasing
        
        
          strain, indicated by the larger areas of the stress-strain loops.
        
        
          3. Do number of loading cycles have an impact on stress-
        
        
          strain behavior? For most of the testing performed so far, there
        
        
          is a definite effect. However, the cyclic behavior tends to
        
        
          stabilize after 100-200 cycles. Since these tests have been
        
        
          performed on dry soil, no pore pressure behavior has been
        
        
          examined yet. Figure 6 shows selected hysteresis loops of a
        
        
          TOSS test performed for 200 load cycles. The soil is stiffening
        
        
          with each cycle as shown by the more vertically inclined loops.
        
        
          Damping is decreasing, evidenced by the narrowing of the loop
        
        
          area.
        
        
          Figure 3. Modulus reduction and damping for two RC tests on Danube
        
        
          Sand.
        
        
          Figure 4. Modulus reduction vs. dimensionless strain, Ramberg-Osgood
        
        
          curve fitted to the test data.
        
        
          Figure 5. TOSS results for four different stress levels. This is cycle no.
        
        
          200 for each stage of the test.
        
        
          4.  Do irregular load histories behave as predicted by soil
        
        
          models? This is a question that cannot be fully answered here
        
        
          since discussion of soil models and cylic loading criteria is
        
        
          rather complex. However, based on preliminary data, one can
        
        
          predict behavior under arbitrary loading histories if the G/G
        
        
          max
        
        
          vs. γ curve is defined by  RC or TOSS (or more typically, both)
        
        
          test data. One irregular load history was used to “track” the
        
        
          progress of the stress-strain curve across the initial backbone
        
        
          curve of the test. Contrary to the theory according to Pyke
        
        
          (1979) the stress strain curve does not follow the backbone
        
        
          curve at the time of crossing. Several tests have been performed
        
        
          and this particluar effect is yet to be seen.