 
          1364
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          within the total thicknesses. Table 4 also shows that within
        
        
          the chainage explored CBR values estimated were very high
        
        
          and these were confined between the upper 35mm and
        
        
          221mm of the 1.0m thick layer. This is an indication of high
        
        
          blow counts as well as refusal to penetration.
        
        
          Four plate loading tests were carried out within the
        
        
          100m stretch. Results are presented in Figure 1. Generally,
        
        
          the modulus of subgrade reaction (k
        
        
          –
        
        
          kN/m
        
        
          3
        
        
          ) is the ratio of
        
        
          loading stress (p) at 1.25mm average settlement to 1.25mm.
        
        
          The loading stress is determined from the load
        
        
          –
        
        
          settlement
        
        
          graph at average settlement of 1.25mm. It is observed from
        
        
          Figure 1 that 3 out of 4 (75%) of the test did not attain the
        
        
          1.25mm settlement criteria at the ultimate stress of 900kN/m
        
        
          2
        
        
          .
        
        
          However at chainage 29+637, k value is estimated as
        
        
          272MN/m
        
        
          3
        
        
          .This value may be considered as lower bound
        
        
          value for the test section and gives an indication of very low
        
        
          or negligible settlement of a compacted layer. The graphs also
        
        
          indicate that no distinct shear failure occurred and so the final
        
        
          load could be considered as the ultimate load. The finished
        
        
          road of the trial section is presented in Figure 4.
        
        
          Figure 2. Compacted shale at trial section
        
        
          Figure 3. Plate load bearing test at trial section
        
        
          Figure 4. Finished road at trial section
        
        
          2 CONCLUSIONS
        
        
          The four day soaking CBR values from the laboratories were
        
        
          below required specification. However field implementation
        
        
          indicated a very good geotechnical strength measure for the
        
        
          shale as fill and embankment material within the 100m test
        
        
          section for the two months observations. The performance
        
        
          characteristics of the shale encouraged its utilization as fill for
        
        
          30km stretch of the road including a 2.0km length, 5m high,
        
        
          of embankment. For nearly two and half years, including the
        
        
          defect liability period, that the road has been in service there
        
        
          has been continuous monitoring and observations. Pavement
        
        
          failure indicators such as rutting and potholing have not been
        
        
          observed as well as significant shear failures in embankments.
        
        
          3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
        
        
          The writers acknowledge Millennium Development
        
        
          Authority, Ghana, the project implementation authority; the
        
        
          project consultant, Gauff Ingenieure (GmbH); the six soil and
        
        
          aggregate laboratories; the department of geology, University
        
        
          of Ghana, Legon and Ghana Geological Survey Department.
        
        
          The Ghana Geotechnical Society is also acknowledged for its
        
        
          technical advice.
        
        
          4
        
        
          REFERENCES
        
        
          Geological Survey Department. 2009. Geological map
        
        
          explanation
        
        
          –
        
        
          map sheets 0601A/4, 0601B/3 & 0601D/1,
        
        
          0601D/2 & 0601D/3. 115
        
        
          –
        
        
          117.
        
        
          Sethi, S. and Schieber, J. 1998. Economic aspects of shales
        
        
          and clays: an overview. Chapter 7. 14
        
        
          Okogbue, C.O. and Aghamelu, O.P. 2010. Comparison of the
        
        
          geotechnical properties of crushed shales from eastern
        
        
          Nigeria. Bulletin of engineering geology and the
        
        
          environment.