 
          1146
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          of the beach having a liquidity index below 1 and the averag
        
        
          for the r
        
        
          elow the maximum liquid limit; as was the
        
        
          case for Dam
        
        
          beach.
        
        
          4. This limitation on drying during active deposition on
        
        
          strength gain was investigated. Only at the outer
        
        
          position did liquidity indices show that substantial shear
        
        
          strength developed. Liquidity indices for the remainder
        
        
          of the beach indicated that the material was prone to fail
        
        
          under shear. This observation was made for all test
        
        
          depositions where the rate of rise for the outer sections
        
        
          was 2.5 m•year
        
        
          -1
        
        
          . The baseline conditions on Dam 2 did
        
        
          not exhibit this strength gain at the beach head due to
        
        
          the 4.6 m•year
        
        
          -1
        
        
          rate of rise thus the requirement of a
        
        
          waste rock impoundment.
        
        
          e
        
        
          4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
        
        
          emainder of the beach being 5 %. This is attributed to
        
        
          the high rate of rise prior to the test deposition. Analysis at the
        
        
          head of the beach within the first two test depositions indicated
        
        
          that 51 % of the samples had a liquidity index below 1 with 75
        
        
          % of the samples b
        
        
          1 at this position. This drying front also appeared
        
        
          to extend roughly 1 m below the first deposition yet insufficient
        
        
          strength gain appeared to have occurred during the shorter
        
        
          sampling window of the final deposition.
        
        
          3 CONCLUSION
        
        
          This paper reported on extensive test work carried out over
        
        
          an 11 month period on two back-to-back platinum tailings
        
        
          facilities. The following conclusions are drawn from the
        
        
          analysis presented:
        
        
          1. The beach acted as a natural thickener with the tailings
        
        
          slurry settling within 65 hours from a water content of
        
        
          on average 95 % to 41 %. This water is available for
        
        
          recovery.
        
        
          2. Following sedimentation water is lost through
        
        
          evaporative drying. The gravimetric water content
        
        
          decreased at a higher rate during summer and a lower
        
        
          rate during winter. The k – value or ratio between water
        
        
          content loss and reference evapotranspiration per day
        
        
          was not constant for all depositions. The k – value was
        
        
          lower during lower evaporative conditions. This
        
        
          suggests that seepage and bleed water may contribute a
        
        
          larger portion of moisture loss during lower evaporative
        
        
          periods. A longer study is required to quantify this
        
        
          relationship.
        
        
          3. After the drying stage a steady state developed. This
        
        
          was marked by water contents varying from sample date
        
        
          to sample date within a narrow distribution. No apparent
        
        
          trend with time was observed. This narrow distribution
        
        
          was found to reflect the seepage of water into upper
        
        
          layers during deposition and capillary rise during
        
        
          drying. Closer to the edge of the dam this distribution
        
        
          was defined by the materials field capacity as sufficient
        
        
          moisture was available to prevent further suctions
        
        
          developing. Only after long dormant periods was this
        
        
          source of moisture observed to deplete. Closer to the
        
        
          pool the water contents were observed to be saturated
        
        
          with the closer phreatic surface preventing any suctions
        
        
          developing. This observation was more pronounced on
        
        
          Dam 1 presumably as the phreatic surface became more
        
        
          depressed along the longer
        
        
          The author wishes to acknowledge Anglo American Platinum
        
        
          Mogalakwena Mine, Fraser Alexander Tailings, SRK
        
        
          Consulting and the South African Weather Bureau for making
        
        
          this study possible.
        
        
          5 REFERENCES
        
        
          Allen R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. 1998.
        
        
          
            Crop
          
        
        
          
            evapotranspiration guidelines
          
        
        
          
            for
          
        
        
          
            computing
          
        
        
          
            crop
          
        
        
          
            water
          
        
        
          
            requirements
          
        
        
          . FAO:Rome.
        
        
          Aubertin, M., Mbonimpa, M., Bussière, B. & Chapuis R.P. 2003. A
        
        
          model to predict the water retention curve from basic geotechnical
        
        
          properties.
        
        
          
            Canadian Geotechnical Journal
          
        
        
          , NRC Canada,
        
        
          40(3):1104–1122.
        
        
          Meyer, P. & Gee, G. 1999. Flux Based Estimation of Field Capacity.
        
        
          
            Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
          
        
        
          ,
        
        
          125(7):595–599.
        
        
          Miller, R.W., Donahue, R.L. 1990.
        
        
          
            Soils, An Introduction to Soils and
          
        
        
          
            Plant Growth.
          
        
        
          Prentice Hall:New Jersey.
        
        
          van Genuchten, M. Th. 1980. A closed form equation predicting the
        
        
          hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.
        
        
          
            Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J
          
        
        
          , 44:
        
        
          892-898.
        
        
          Bovis, M.J. 2003. Atterberg Limits.
        
        
          
            Encyclopaedia of Sediments &
          
        
        
          
            Sedimentary Rocks
          
        
        
          , Middleton, G.V. ed. Kluver Academic
        
        
          Publishers:Dordrecht, 22 – 24.
        
        
          Holtz, R.D. & Kovacs, W.D. 1982.
        
        
          
            An Introduction to Geotechnical
          
        
        
          
            Engineering.
          
        
        
          Prentice Hall:New Jersey.