Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  82 / 479 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 82 / 479 Next Page
Page Background

Proceedings of the 18

th

International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013, volume 6, 2016

which was also found in the numerical studies conducted at

CERMES, could yield a greater capacity for the network relative

to that of the equivalent group.

Tank-based tests performed at the 3S Laboratory in Grenoble

used networks with a significantly higher number of micropiles

(N = 18) and a better level of interlocking (

< 0° and

> 180°,

with micropile intersections), as shown in Figure 9. In the case

of a near cylindrical network (defined by

= 20° and

= -

30°/210°), a positive effect is observed on load-bearing capacity

relative to the equivalent group, beginning with the smallest

displacements. In all cases, a strain hardening phenomenon is

identified, thus confirming the soil passive pressure phenomenon

on long and flexible inclusions.

Fig. 9: An 18-micropile network at the 3S Laboratory in Grenoble

5.5

Comments on transversally-loaded networks

The horizontal loading tests only involved simple networks:

double easels (A-shaped) at the St Rémy-lès-Chevreuse site, and

single easels (A-shaped) at sites in Alabama (U.S.) and St

Maurice (France). These results have confirmed that micropile

inclination exhibits a highly beneficial impact on the resistance

to transverse forces. These cases are merely static loadings, yet

results are similar for dynamic or seismic loadings.

As for the double easels at the St Rémy-lès-Chevreuse site,

horizontal resistance is 2 to 3 times greater than that of the group

with a relative S/B spacing = 2. The numerical studies carried

out at CERMES have confirmed this finding as well.

5.6

Conclusions and recommendations

Research conducted within the scope of the

FOREVER

NP has

given rise to over 70 reports and articles. It has also led to the

publication of a 347-page book entitled "

Synthesis of the

results and recommendations of the French National Project

on micropiles

" by

Presses des Ponts et Chaussées

. An English

language translation was published by the American ADSC

Association on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration.

Moreover, a compilation of this book's scientific results has

served as the basis for several additional projects at foreign

universities. In another outcome, the collaborative research

completed as part of

FOREVER

has fostered creation of the

International Society for Micropiles (ISM), which associates

practitioners from North America, Europe and Japan.

5.6.1 Micropile groups

These experimental results have revealed a positive group effect

(i.e. C

e

> 1) for groups that include a large number of flexible

piles, with this effect being primarily due to soil confinement

between micropiles. This point has been confirmed by the high

skin friction values whenever measurements were feasible.

The group effect reaches a maximum at a relative S/B

spacing between micropiles = 2.5 to 4. For higher values, the

level of confinement is reduced and the load-bearing capacity of

the group approaches the sum of all load-bearing capacities of

the various isolated micropiles (C

e

= 1). It is obvious that

confinement can be improved by means of an appropriate

micropile placement method (e.g. driving or jacking into loose

sands).

As regards underpinning of foundation, it has been

confirmed, as shown in research and studies on the

Pont de

Pierre

in Bordeaux, that micropiles offer an efficient and well

adapted solution for stabilizing the foundation movements of old

structures.

5.6.2 Resistance of micropile groups to horizontal forces

The experiments performed on groups of horizontally-loaded

micropiles indicate that these group effects are comparable to

those of regular piles with conventional diameter dimensions:

- the total resistance of a micropile group is less than the sum

of each individual resistance of all micropiles due to the shadow

effect of piles placed in front of the micropiles located in back,

yet this negative effect may be neglected once the spacing

reaches 6 to 7 diameters;

- whenever micropiles are placed in a row perpendicular to

the loading direction, the group resistance is weakened by

mechanical interactions within the soil. This decrease however

remains modest and may be neglected once spacing has

exceeded 3 diameters;

- micropiles installed by means of soil displacement show

greater stiffness in a horizontal loading pattern than micropiles

placed using techniques that do not displace the soil.

5.6.3 Numerical methods for estimating the displacements of a

micropile group

Research conducted within the scope of

FOREVER

has led to

developing the GOUPEG Program, which makes use of the

(t-z)

and

(p-y)

transfer functions, as well as linear elasticity for the

interactions between micropiles. This program is naturally also

valid for piles.

In order to calculate the displacement of micropile groups, a

distinction needs to be drawn between two types of effects that

differ considerably in their nature:

- effects due to the implementation technique, which modifies

soil properties both in the vicinity and at the soil/micropile

interface (effects that can only be estimated since a calculation

proves impossible);

Volume 6 - Page 82