Actes du colloque - Volume 2 - page 173

1042
Proceedings of the 18
th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
to model this experiment at the pore scale. To set up our
unsteady-state simulations, we use periodic external boundary
conditions. Both fluids could exit the model, but only the
displacing fluid can enter the model. This makes the velocity
field continuous during the displacement and enhances the
stability of the simulations. The pressure field was controlled by
a body force that was applied equally to both fluids.
6 REFRENCES
Chen H., Chen S. and Matthaeus W. H.,(1992), Recovery of the Navier–
Stokes equations using a lattice-gas Boltzmann methods. Phys. Rev.
A, 45: 5339–5342.
Chen S. and Doolen G. (1998). Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid
flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics,30, 329–364.
The body force is regulated to keep a constant total mean
velocity and thus constant capillary number (Ramstad et al.
2010). The effluent composition and pressure drop across the
model
are continuously monitored. Figure 4b
show the evolution
of the wetting phase into the medium and Figure6shows the
experimental relative permeability curve as well as the results of
LB simulation performed at similar capillary number. The
LBM code predicts the trends of the variations of relative
permeabilities correctly however, the discrepancies look more
for unsteady-state relative permeability curves compare to those
of the steady state. One of the sources of uncertainty in the
current numerical results is the unfavorable effects of spurious
velocities. In a SC type LBM simulation, largest spurious
velocities occur near the interfacial region of the fluids (Jia et
al., 2008). Therefore, high spurious velocities may affect the
calculated fluxes especially for very slow or creep fluid flows.
On the other hand, as mentioned before the experimental values
are not measured directly from the tests. They are calculated
using the JBN method. This may also contribute to the
difference that is seen between the experimental and
numerically-derived values.
Ghassemi A., Pak A.,(2011),
Numerical Study of Factors Influencing
Relative Permeabilities of Two Immiscible Fluids Flowing
through Porous media using Lattice Boltzmann Method, Journal of
Petroleum Science and Engineering.,77, 135-145.
Gunstensen AK, Rothman DH, Zaleski S, Zanetti G., (1991), Lattice
Boltzmann model of immiscible fluids. Physical Review A, 43,
4320-4327.
He X., Zou Q., Luo L. S., Dembo M.,(1997), Analytic solutions and
analysis on non-slip boundary condition for the lattice boltzmann
BGK model. Stat Phys., 87:115–136.
Jia X., McLaughlin J. B., Kontomaris K., (2008), Lattice Boltzmann
simulations of flows with fluid–fluid interfaces, Asia-pacific
journal of chemical engineering, 3: 124–143.
Johnson E.F., Bossler D.D., Naumann V.O,(1959), Calculation of
relative permeability from displacement experiments, Trans.
AIME
216
, 370.
Keehm Y., Mukerji T. and Nur A.,(2004), Relative Permeability
Simulation using the Two-phase Lattice-Boltzmann Method., 5th
Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, Hyderabad-,
India PP 696-703.
Lallemand P., Luo L.-S. (2000), Theory of the lattice Boltzmann
method: Dispersion, dissipation, isotropy, Galilean invariance, and
stability, Physical Review E 61:6546-6562.
Lenormand R., Zarcone C. and Sarr A., (1983), Mechanisms of the
displacement of one fluid by another in a network of capillary
ducts, J. Fluid Mech., 135, 337-353.
Li H., Pan C., Miller C.T., (2005), Pore-scale investigation of viscous
coupling effects for two-phase flow in porous media, PHYSICAL
REVIEW E 72, 026705.
Nourgaliev R.R., Theofanous T.G., Joseph D.D., (2003),The lattice
Boltzmann equation method: the oretical interpretation, numerics
and implications, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 29:
117-169.
Pan C., Hilpert M. and Miller C. T., (2004), Lattice-Boltzmann
simulation of two-phase flow in porous media, Water Res. Research
40, W01501.
Qian Y. H. d’Humie`res D., Lallemand P.,(1992),Lattice BGK models
for Navier–Stokes equation. EurophysLett., 17:479–484.
Figure 6.Comparison of LB modeling results and experimental relative
permeability curves (unsteady state)
(Ca=5E-6).
Ramstad T., Idowu N. and Nardi C.,(2011),
Relative Permeability
Calculations from Two-Phase Flow Simulations Directly on
Digital Images of Porous Rocks., Transp Porous Med,11-9877-8.
Ramstad T., Qren P.E., Bakke S.,(2010), Simulation of two phase flow
in reservoir rocks using a lattice Boltzmann method. SPE J.
15
(4),
917–927.
5 CONCLUSIONS
A newly developed Lattice Boltzmann-based numerical code
has been described in this paper. This model is based on Shan &
Chen (SC) formulation which is capable of simulating the
simultaneous flow of two immiscible fluids at the pore scale
considering all the important interacting effects such as
interfacial tension and capillary. Using this code the variation of
relative permeabilities of two-fluid flow under steady state and
unsteady sate conditions has been simulated which is of utmost
importance in petroleum reservoir engineering. MRT approach
has been employed in the code to eliminate the problem of the
dependency of the results to the viscosity. The obtained results
indicate that LBM is a powerful method that can simulate
complex problems pertaining flow in porous materials as well
as solving difficult issues in petroleum geomechanics. Results
obtained in this study about the variation of the relative
permeabilities in the reservoir rock reveal that although the
results for steady state two-fluid flow is quite promising, the
modeling of unsteady flow warrants further investigation.
Schaap M. G., Porter M. L. Christensen B. and Wildenschild D., (2007),
Comparison of pressure-saturation characteristics derived from
computed tomography and lattice Boltzmann simulations, Water
Res. Research 43,W12S06.
Shan X, Chen H. (1993), Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating flow
with multiple phases and components, Physical Review E, 47,
1815-1819.
Succi S.,Foti E. and HigueraF., (1989), Europhys.Lett., 1989, 10, 433.
Sukop, M.C. and D.T. Thorne, Jr., (2006), Lattice Boltzmann Modeling:
An introduction for geoscientists and engineers, Springer,
Heidelberg, Berlin, New York 172 p.
Swift M.R., Orlandi E, Osborn W.R., Yeomans J.M., (1996), Lattice
Boltzmann simulations of liquid-gas and binary fluid systems,
Physical Review E, 54, 5041-5052.
Tsakiroglou C. D., Avraam D. G., Payatakees A. C.,(2007),Transient
and steady-state relative permeabilities from two-phase flow
experiments in planar pore networks., Advances in Water
Resources, 30 ,1981–1992.
Valavanides M.S., Constantinides, G.N. and Payatakes, A.C.,(1998),
Mechanistic Model of Steady-State Two-Phase Flow in Porous
Media Based on Ganglion Dynamics, Transport in Porous Media,
30, pp.267-299
1...,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172 174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,...913