

Proceedings of the 18
th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013, volume 6, 2016
French Innovations in Geotechnics: The National Research Projects
English translation of the Special Lecture in French, “Innovations Françaises en Géotechnique: les Projets
Nationaux de Recherche”,
Proc 18
th
Int Conf Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Eng, Paris 2013, Volume 1, 163-182.
F. Schlosser; C. Plumelle; R. Frank; A. Puech; H. Gonin; F. Rocher-Lacoste; B. Simon
French Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (CFMS)
C. Bernardini
Institute for Applied Research and Experimentation in Civil Engineering (IREX)
ABSTRACT: Full-scale experiments have been considered extremely useful to French civil engineering since the 1960's as a means
of studying structural behavior and new process mechanisms. At the end of the 1970's, the innovative concept behind France's
National experimental research Projects (or NPs) was devised by a French civil engineer named M. Martin. The originality of this
concept lies in the fact that 80% to 85% of funding is generated by project members in the form of subscriptions and especially in-
kind contributions (allocating research time and experimental sites, conducting tests, providing equipment, etc.), with the assigned
Ministry then financing just 15% or 20% of the total budget. The first NP, labeled "
Clouterre
" (1986-90), focused on soil nailing for
retaining walls and was followed by 30 more civil engineering projects, 7 of which involved geotechnical engineering. The IREX
Institute (Institute for Applied Research and Experimentation in Civil Engineering), created in 1989, supervised and managed such
projects. This paper presents the initial steps and the procedure for the NPs, and describes 5 of them in the field of geotechnical
engineering..
KEYWORDS: research, project, innovation, instrumentation, physical and numerical modeling, full-scale experiments.
1
INTRODUCTION
Soil behavior is a complex phenomenon, and no theory is
available to accurately calculate the stresses and strains of a soil
subjected to any kind of loading. As such, the skeleton of a soil
is neither elastic nor even elastoplastic. Moreover, the water-
skeleton coupling is typically difficult to assess. Despite the
tremendous developments in computing power, it is still
impossible to obtain a set of relations between stresses and
strains both capable of correctly representing the behavior of a
soil composition and usable in practice. All theories are merely
approximations.
The experimental approach to soil behavior thus remains a
key element, especially for verifying a theory's validity.
Mandel's similarity laws (1961) had already revealed the
limitations of reduced-scale sand models, under static loading,
subsequent to the scale effect, which has gradually led to
developing centrifuges in the field of geotechnical engineering.
Furthermore, the widespread development over the past several
decades of measurement instrumentation has not only enabled
studying certain aspects of the behavior of geotechnical facilities
in operation, but has also produced full-scale experimental
structures, which have greatly advanced the state of knowledge.
In France, J. Kérisel (1962) produced the first type of full-
scale experimental structure dedicated to pile behavior. After
conducting, on the Maracaibo Bridge in Venezuela, the first pile
loading test by means of separately measuring both the tip load
and total load at the pile cap, J. Kérisel built a large-sized testing
station on the sandy St Rémy-lès-Chevreuse site, where piles
were being driven into a vast and deep concrete tank filled with
compacted sand. He proceeded by separately measuring the tip
load during pile-driving and found that it varied linearly at first
until reaching a depth of roughly three times the pile diameter,
then remained constant beyond that point. This result, now
widely renowned, has contributed extensively to changing the
pile cap strength calculation with respect to previously applied
theories.
In France, another full-scale experimental structure was built
at the same St Rémy-lès-Chevreuse site, this time by Tcheng
(1975), on the CEBTP Institute's testing station to study large
sand masses that had gradually undergone a state of thrust or
bearing. The station's primary element was a very stiff metal
screen, 5 m wide by 3 m high, containing in its central part 6
embedded measurement cells outputting both the vertical and
horizontal stress components. This screen had been suspended
by 8 hydraulic jacks; then, assisted by a servo control system, it
could be rotated around an axis lying close to the base and
translated horizontally. Two sands were tested: Fontainebleau
sand, characterized by a homogeneous particle size distribution;
and Loire sand, with a much broader distribution. These results
were instructive, notably as regards deviations between theory
and reality, yet they also exposed the difficulties tied to such an
experimental campaign, given an initial state (K
0
) that depends
on the level of compaction and varies considerably from top to
bottom of the screen.
As of the mid-1960's, the LCPC (French Central Laboratory
for Bridges and Highways) has undertaken, in collaboration with
the LRPC (its regional laboratories), research on soft soil
embankments (1973), ground slope stability (1976), deep
foundations and new retaining structures. In each case, one or
more full-scale experimental structures had been built
specifically for this research effort. Regarding slope stability, a
naturally unstable hill slope was dedicated to this endeavor and
heavily instrumented; monitoring could then take place over
several years.
Research on France's new Reinforced Earth retaining
technique, invented by Henri Vidal in 1963, helped give rise to a
set of Recommendations and State-of-the-Art Practices (1979),
produced jointly by LCPC and the SETRA Road and Highway
Research Center. An experimental Reinforced Earth wall was
built in 1968 by the Eure Departmental Public Works Office and
then instrumented by the Western Paris LRPC Laboratory. For
the first time, this wall made it possible to demonstrate that the
tensile force in reinforcement strips was not being maximized at
the level of the facing, but instead at a given distance inside the
wall (see Fig. 1).
Volume 6 - Page 75