 
          1070
        
        
          Proceedings of the 18
        
        
          th
        
        
          International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
        
        
          2 BACKGROUND
        
        
          
            2.1 The constitutive relationship for estimating the vertical
          
        
        
          
            movements of expansive soils
          
        
        
          The volume change behavior of any expansive soil deposit
        
        
          relative to the changes in site conditions can be rationally
        
        
          interpreted by extending continuum mechanics principles in
        
        
          terms of two independent stress state variables of unsaturated
        
        
          soils; namely, matric suction (u
        
        
          a
        
        
          –
        
        
          u
        
        
          w
        
        
          ), and net normal stress
        
        
          (σ –
        
        
          u
        
        
          a
        
        
          ) (where, u
        
        
          a
        
        
          = the pore-air pressure, u
        
        
          w
        
        
          = the pore-
        
        
          water pressure, and σ
        
        
          = the total stress). Water movement into
        
        
          / out of an unsaturated expansive soil leads to a change in
        
        
          suction and contributes to soil volume change predominantly in
        
        
          the vertical direction (i.e., the soil lateral deformations are
        
        
          negligible). In other words, the K
        
        
          0
        
        
          -loading was assumed in the
        
        
          present study. In the MEBM, the incremental vertical
        
        
          movement, dh, was related to changes in matric suction
        
        
          neglecting the limited influence of the net normal stress within
        
        
          the surficial active zone as follows:
        
        
          s
        
        
          2 a
        
        
          w
        
        
          dh m d(u u )
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          (1)
        
        
          where,
        
        
          s
        
        
          2
        
        
          m (1 ) / (H( 1))
        
        
              
        
        
          = the soil
        
        
          structure
        
        
          compressibility modulus associated with a change in suction
        
        
          (u
        
        
          a
        
        
          ˗ u
        
        
          w
        
        
          ) (where H = elasticity modulus with respect to
        
        
          change in suction
        
        
          and μ =
        
        
          P
        
        
          oisson’s ratio
        
        
          ).
        
        
          To calculate the vertical soil movement for a given site, the
        
        
          soil within the active zone was divided into n layers. The
        
        
          vertical movement for each layer,
        
        
          Δ
        
        
          h
        
        
          i
        
        
          , was computed by
        
        
          multiplying the incremental vertical movement at the mid-layer
        
        
          (Equation 1) and the layer thickness, h
        
        
          i
        
        
          . The total vertical
        
        
          movement for the soil profile,
        
        
          Δ
        
        
          h, was then calculated by
        
        
          adding the vertical movement of all layers within the active
        
        
          zone.
        
        
          n
        
        
          n
        
        
          s
        
        
          i
        
        
          i
        
        
          2 a w i
        
        
          i 1
        
        
          i 1
        
        
          h
        
        
          h
        
        
          h m d(u u )
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
             
        
        
          
        
        
            
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          (2)
        
        
          Oh et al. 2009 studies show that the value of the modulus
        
        
          of elasticity with respect to change in net normal stress, E,
        
        
          varies significantly with soil suction. In the proposed
        
        
          MEBM, the semi-empirical model introduced by Vanapalli
        
        
          and Oh (2010) was used to estimate the modulus of
        
        
          elasticity, E, associated with any value of the soil suction.
        
        
          a
        
        
          w
        
        
          unsat
        
        
          sat
        
        
          a
        
        
          (u u )
        
        
          E E 1
        
        
          (S)
        
        
          (P 101.3)
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
            
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          (3)
        
        
          where E
        
        
          unsat
        
        
          and E
        
        
          sat
        
        
          = the soil moduli of elasticity under
        
        
          unsaturated and saturated conditions, respectively, P
        
        
          a
        
        
          =
        
        
          atmospheric pressure (i.e., 101.3 kPa), S = degree of
        
        
          saturation, and
        
        
          
        
        
          and
        
        
          
        
        
          = the fitting parameters.
        
        
          To calculate the soil structure compressibility
        
        
          modulus,
        
        
          s
        
        
          2
        
        
          m
        
        
          , the modulus of elasticity with respect to
        
        
          change in suction, H, was estimated using the relationship
        
        
          below:
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
        
          H E / 1 2
        
        
            
        
        
          (4)
        
        
          The relationship between H and E may be more complex
        
        
          for soils in a state of unsaturated condition; however, this
        
        
          relationship which is valid for saturated soils has been
        
        
          extended for unsaturated soils in the present study. Similar
        
        
          assumptions were suggested by Geo-Slope International Ltd. for
        
        
          modeling soil heave due to infiltration using SIGMA/W.
        
        
          
            2.2 VADOSE/W for estimating the changes in soil suction
          
        
        
          Estimation of soil suction changes due to soil water migration
        
        
          (infiltration/evaporation) in the active zone is important in
        
        
          predicting the vertical movement of expansive soils. The
        
        
          computer program VADOSE/W, a product of Geo-studio, was
        
        
          used as a tool to estimate the net changes in soil suction with
        
        
          respect to time and depth (Geo-Slope 2007). The program
        
        
          couples the flow of water, heat and vapor through both saturated
        
        
          and unsaturated soils
        
        
          to provide a direct evaluation of
        
        
          soil water
        
        
          storage and suction
        
        
          .
        
        
          Critical to the formulation of VADOSE/W
        
        
          is its ability to predict actual evaporation as a function of
        
        
          climate data, applied as an upper boundary condition, using the
        
        
          rigorous Penman-Wilson method (Wilson, 1990).
        
        
          The input parameters required for VADOSE/W include soil
        
        
          properties such as the SWCC and the coefficient of permeability
        
        
          function, climate and vegetation data. The climate data include
        
        
          the daily precipitation, the maximum and minimum daily
        
        
          temperature, the maximum and minimum daily relative
        
        
          humidity, the average daily wind speed and net radiation. The
        
        
          vegetation data include the leaf area index (LAI), the plant
        
        
          moisture limiting point, the root depth and the length of the
        
        
          growing season.
        
        
          The output from VADOSE/W includes modeled data such as
        
        
          temperature, evaporation, suction, and volumetric water content.
        
        
          In the present study, only the modeling results for soil suctions
        
        
          versus time are presented and compared with the published data
        
        
          of Ito and Hu (2011).
        
        
          3 CASE STUDY: REGINA EXPANSIVE CLAY (ITO AND
        
        
          HU 2011)
        
        
          The city of Regina, SK, Canada is located on highly expansive
        
        
          clay deposits that exhibit large volume changes as the soil
        
        
          moisture changes. Failures in light infrastructures buried in the
        
        
          soil have increased greatly in recent years, especially in older
        
        
          areas with asbestos cement (AC) water mains (Hu et al. 2008).
        
        
          As a part of a program of study the performance of AC water
        
        
          mains in Regina expansive clay, Ito and Hu (2011) modeled a
        
        
          site located in a residential area with a high water main
        
        
          breakage rate. It includes a park area with thick grass of 100
        
        
          mm and a wide paved road with 150 mm thick asphalt
        
        
          pavement. Infiltration due to precipitation and park watering
        
        
          and evapotranspiration from the grass were considered to model
        
        
          the soil suction fluctuations for this site.
        
        
          The results from the Regina test site were used to validate
        
        
          the proposed MEBM in estimating the vertical soil movements
        
        
          over time considering the field condition (vegetated park area
        
        
          and asphalt-paved area). The stratigraphy of the site consists of
        
        
          approximately 6.4 m of highly plastic clay, 1.8 m of elastic silt
        
        
          and 6.8 m of till as shown in Figure 1. The choice of thickness
        
        
          and soil properties for each layer was guided by field
        
        
          observations made by Vu et al. (2007). The climate data
        
        
          obtained from a weather station at the Regina international
        
        
          airport was applied at the vegetative cover over a period of one
        
        
          year (from 1 May, 2009 to 30 April, 2010). Figures 2 and 3
        
        
          show the SWCCs and the coefficient of permeability functions,
        
        
          respectively, for Regina and other materials used in the
        
        
          numerical modelling. Ito and Hu (2011) provide more details
        
        
          about the soil, the climate, and the vegetation data of the site.
        
        
          4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
        
        
          
            4.1 Estimation of the soil suctions
          
        
        
          The soil profile shown in Figure 1 was modeled using the
        
        
          fully coupled transient analysis with the 2-D software
        
        
          package (VADOSE/W) to estimate the suction changes
        
        
          associated with the environmental changes for a period of
        
        
          one year. Beside the soil properties, the initial and boundary
        
        
          conditions are needed as input data to run the program.
        
        
          The
        
        
          initial conditions for all nodes of the model domain, including
        
        
          pressure and temperature, were derived from implementing a
        
        
          steady-state analysis using the same model.
        
        
          Based on the field
        
        
          suction data measured by Vu et al. (2007),
        
        
          the
        
        
          initial
        
        
          pressure head
        
        
          during the steady-state analysis
        
        
          was set up to be
        
        
          -163.15 m for the top 3 m of the clay layer, -101.97 m for
        
        
          the rest of the clay, -61.18 m for the silt, and -203.94 m for
        
        
          the till. T
        
        
          he temperatures of nodes at the lower boundary were
        
        
          set up to be 10
        
        
          o
        
        
          C
        
        
          .
        
        
          Figure 1. Soil profile and soil properties (Ito and Hu 2011)