Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  265 / 479 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 265 / 479 Next Page
Page Background

Proceedings of the 18

th

International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013

REPORT FROM THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF ISSMGE FOR AUSTRALASIA

Rapport du vice-président de SIMSG pour l'Australasie

M.C.R. Davies

ISSMGE Vice-President for Australasia

ABSTRACT: This report contains a summary of the highlights of the activities of the ISSMGE Member Societies in Australasia – the

Australian Geomechanics Society (AGS) and the New Zealand Geotechnical Society (NZGS) - for the period since the last Council

meeting in Toronto in October 2011.

RÉSUMÉ : Ce rapport contient un résumé des points saillants des activités des SIMSG Sociétés Membres en Australasie –

l’Australian Geomechanics Society (AGS) et la New Zealand Geotechnical Society (NZGS) - pour la période depuis la dernière

réunion du Conseil à Toronto en octobre 2011.

KEYWORDS: Regional report, Australasia.

1

MEMBER SOCIETIES

Australasia is the smallest ISSMGE region in terms of the

number of Member Societies. However, in terms of its

membership – which at 1590 in 2013 represents some 8% of the

ISSMGE membership - Australasia ranks 4

th

out of the 6

ISSMGE regions. Australia and New Zealand are not highly

populated counties and the current membership of the region

represents 89 ISSMGE members per million of the population

(46 for Australia and 132 for New Zealand), Figure 1. This

compares to an overall average of 11 ISSMGE members per

million of the population for the Society as a whole. These

statistics reflect not only the high level of interest in the

ISSMGE by engineers in the region but also the level of

geotechnical engineering activity taking place.

Figure 1.

ISSMGE Members per 10

6

of the population.

(After data

presented by Professor Roberto Terzariol, Vice President for South

America, in ISSMGE Bulletin, Volume 5, Issue 2, April 2011)

To some extent the importance of geotechnical engineering

in both Australia and New Zealand is for similar reasons but

there are specific national conditions that prevail. For example,

in both countries there is a requirement to deal with natural

hazards that have large scale detrimental effects on society.

However, whilst slope stability presents geotechnical challenges

to engineers on both sides of the Tasman Sea – which separates

the two countries – New Zealand is located at the boundary of

the Australian and Pacific tectonic plates and has, therefore, a

much higher risk of major earthquake hazards than Australia,

which is not located on any major tectonic plate boundaries.

Australia has an extensive mining industry that requires the

expertise of geotechnical engineers. This industry is

contributing to a relatively strong economy in Australia and the

growth in its population. This, in turn, has resulted in major

opportunities for infrastructure development. There is a demand

in both counties, therefore, for practitioners with a wide range

of expertise across the range of geotechnical engineering;

including engineering geology, rock mechanics and soil

mechanics. It is not surprising, therefore, that both the AGS and

the NZGS are the national societies for the IAEG and the ISRM

as well as the ISSMGE. Although in both cases ISSMGE

members represent the largest group.

Figure 2. Australian Geomechanics Society - membership

Since the beginning of the current ISSSMGE presidency in

2009 the membership of both the AGS and the NZGS as grow

significantly. The AGS is the largest Technical Society within

Engineers Australia and its membership currently stands at

Volume 6 - Page 265